by RodJammerJR February 06, 2024
A woman you date that can't converse with you unless she thinks it for the approval of another person, but sex with her is strange and interesting because her Virgina is tigghter than other women but she's slept with 392 men unprotected. That's not including repeat offenders
I can't believe I almost got shot at Sturgis because someone wanted this hole of a woman. The bitch likes arts and craft counts money and eats glue.
by Dredfulluc April 18, 2021
by Ry92 January 13, 2024
A inconscient bitch of her own ridicule and of really facts. She is worthless, but thinks that is desirable for men and goes often (due to her high libido) to social market make victims. Of course she only gets leftovers, authistic men, low life's, losers who end up with this fat escalade in a dress. The more ridiculous is the fact that she thinks that she is doing something Investisting in social life.
Plus, this mediocre, jelous and laz human, often bullies and atackes beautiful, slim, hot, tall, firm women, randomly in the street, with her code words. Always cowardly.
They feel this need in order to feel less inferior. But the fact is that they don't accept reality!
Plus, this mediocre, jelous and laz human, often bullies and atackes beautiful, slim, hot, tall, firm women, randomly in the street, with her code words. Always cowardly.
They feel this need in order to feel less inferior. But the fact is that they don't accept reality!
by Defender9020 August 27, 2023
A "direct correlation" would mean a correlation of 1. A correlation of 1 is as high as it gets. So I highly doubt the correlation between porn and WHATEVER is 1. A correlation of .7 is HIGH in terms of correlation (apparently). So high that Jordan Peterson cites the correlation when he's talking about the relationship between wealth and sexual selection success. But don't feel bad. You're not the only one using correlation wrong!
Hym "They need to retitle that video 'feminine woman DOESN'T DEBUNK FUCKING ANYTHING.' Oh shit... Have I been using correlation wrong? Oh shit! That means the correlation between fat cocks and sexual selection success can be HIGHER than .3! HOLY SHIT! I've google that word live 12 different times! How am I just now getting that!? Shit, it could even be higher than .7! What's more, there can be an inverse correlation between 2 things. You could have a correlation between fat cocks and reproductive success that it like 1 AND a correlation between baby dicks and reproductive success that is like -1. What do the studies say? Is there a study? What's the correlation between fat cock and success? It's high. I bet you 1 million dollars it's higher than .7! WE'RE BACK IN HERE! CRITICAL FAT-COCK THEORY! I look like an idiot for using it wrong but WHAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS is that I COULD BE MORE RIGHT THAN I THOUGHT I WAS! I could be MORE RIGHT THAN JORDAN!"
by Hym Iam August 14, 2023
Shes and Oxnard Woman like a pillow princess, doesn't give head or anal. You'd be lucky to get a hand job.
by Daddy Hub May 23, 2024