A simple thought experiment to explain the process behind the electoral college
You and two friends decide to go out to eat for lunch, only one of you brought a card so you all agree to venmo the one who brought it after you eat as none of you brought any cash either.
You want to get some pizza, and your two friends want to eat human shit sandwiches, you decide to put it to a democratic vote because that’s obviously the most fair right?
You obviously lose and you have to eat the shit sandwich, sucks doesn’t it?
How could this have been avoided?
Simple, you make your vote worth 2, this forces an even tie and forces the shit sandwich twins (you should probably stop hanging out with them btw) to compromise, you all end up agreeing on burgers and you eat in relative peace
Now apply this logic to the electoral college, and you understand why the Montana Wheat farmer or the Wyoming cattle rancher’s state gets to have as much of a say as California or New York
You and two friends decide to go out to eat for lunch, only one of you brought a card so you all agree to venmo the one who brought it after you eat as none of you brought any cash either.
You want to get some pizza, and your two friends want to eat human shit sandwiches, you decide to put it to a democratic vote because that’s obviously the most fair right?
You obviously lose and you have to eat the shit sandwich, sucks doesn’t it?
How could this have been avoided?
Simple, you make your vote worth 2, this forces an even tie and forces the shit sandwich twins (you should probably stop hanging out with them btw) to compromise, you all end up agreeing on burgers and you eat in relative peace
Now apply this logic to the electoral college, and you understand why the Montana Wheat farmer or the Wyoming cattle rancher’s state gets to have as much of a say as California or New York
by Cockyrooster1135 June 19, 2022
“Bro, how do you know every Desi kid from my first grade class, I lived 3 cities over”
“It’s the Desi connection theory”
“It’s the Desi connection theory”
by YumiYumiNoMi January 11, 2023
when a person thinks he’s at his best ,then something horrible happens to him but eventually he’s way better than before and so on
by sushirice828 July 04, 2022
The theory that if you own a pair of pants, everything inside it is yours. If someone wears your pair of pants, all the things inside the pants at that time, including their butt, belong to the pants owner.
by foootballislife November 24, 2021
Another way of saying that a person has drip. Drip theory is a theory in which all principles of having drip are met; a person is wearing 3 or more items that make them drippy.
by DESIGNERWEAR October 12, 2022
Another form of "having drip" or "being drippy"; usually consisting of 3 or more articles of flashy/expensive/shiney jewelry. A theory in which a set principles are based on the amount of jewelry a person is wearing in close proximity of eachother on that person's body; usually consisting of 3 or more peices.
"DAMN! Dude has 3 watches on his wrist, he's definitely got drip theory."
"Are you gonna have a drip theory for tonight's party?"
"Are you gonna have a drip theory for tonight's party?"
by DESIGNERWEAR October 13, 2022
The idea that any media can and will be connected to Fortnite. Items can be shortly defined by how many steps there are between it and Fortnite, so Fortnite itself would have a degree of 0 (Fortnite^0) and Minecraft would have a degree of 3 (Minecraft^3)
by Behn2 October 17, 2021