by KSeegan July 16, 2011
Get the Face Textingmug. 
The long sappy text message you either send or receive from someone declaring their emotions in a last ditch effort or goodbye.
I feel bad for ghosting him, but I really wasn’t expecting Daniel to send me the “long text” after just one date.
by Christocoop November 8, 2017
Get the The “Long Text”mug. by Bak Hyemi August 7, 2021
Get the Blue Textmug. A person who lies inorder to keep a texting conversation going or does not know what a text killier is supposed to do and wont shut up and stop texting you. When a Textrovert wont realize when to stop texting .
by blackt3948 November 7, 2010
Get the Text-homug. Double texting is an absurd new way to turn an entire aspect of social communication into a taboo irrational thing. Generally used by normies that can't argue and instead spend times writing fallacious ad hominem arguments, but also an influencer that knows how to trick easily influenced people.
In practice, the meaning is vague and ambiguous , leaving the user the choice to use this new "trendy(sic)" term as they please. It generally means either that :
-the opposite interlocutor has sent multiple messages in a row .
-the opposite interlocutor is simulteanously talking with two persons , including the user.
According to the second definition, if a frequent double text caller also listens to rap (which tends to be the case in newer generations which will use this "trendy new term") , it is very plausible that they'll recoil in fear due to a cognitive dissonance as people point out the rapper they listen to also tends to "double text", if not "octuple text" , and many times in a row .
See also: fallacy , argument , normie and more specifically simian .
E.g:
In practice, the meaning is vague and ambiguous , leaving the user the choice to use this new "trendy(sic)" term as they please. It generally means either that :
-the opposite interlocutor has sent multiple messages in a row .
-the opposite interlocutor is simulteanously talking with two persons , including the user.
According to the second definition, if a frequent double text caller also listens to rap (which tends to be the case in newer generations which will use this "trendy new term") , it is very plausible that they'll recoil in fear due to a cognitive dissonance as people point out the rapper they listen to also tends to "double text", if not "octuple text" , and many times in a row .
See also: fallacy , argument , normie and more specifically simian .
E.g:
X and Y are in a heated argument about a bomb , about which Y barely reveals anything. Y is the double text caller.
Y: Uh uh, no, well I think this bomb is at least 100 times stronger than 50 kilotons.
Y: 1000* lol i didn't notice
Y: one zero didn't appear
Here, X does not take action concerning the fact Y "double texted" , simply because they aren't interested in this kind of "trendy terms" and would rather get educated.
X: Absolutely wrong. Assuming it is a regular old chemical-based bomb, you simply can't reach such powers above 11t.
X: Mind you, not kt (kiloton), just t (ton) of TNT.
Y: uuuuuugh r u double texting ?
Y: double texter SMH SMH SMH
Y Proceeds to then spam a half ton of unicode symbols that contain colors, more specifically yellow faces displaying Y's apparent annoyance for the double text, although it is evident they simply can't argue at X's level and are bothered by it.
--
(Note: 11 tons of TNT of power is referring to the MOAB's blast yield, which is (currently) the highest of any chemical/regular bombs. Nuclear bombs can reach much higher yields measured sometimes in the megatons because they convert mass into energy much more efficiently (Chemical bombs barely convert anything to E in E=MC² , while nuclear fission bombs reach 4% at best (which is still rather efficient compared to , for example, coal plants, which explains how optimal atomic plants are compared to something that barely releases any energy.))
Y: Uh uh, no, well I think this bomb is at least 100 times stronger than 50 kilotons.
Y: 1000* lol i didn't notice
Y: one zero didn't appear
Here, X does not take action concerning the fact Y "double texted" , simply because they aren't interested in this kind of "trendy terms" and would rather get educated.
X: Absolutely wrong. Assuming it is a regular old chemical-based bomb, you simply can't reach such powers above 11t.
X: Mind you, not kt (kiloton), just t (ton) of TNT.
Y: uuuuuugh r u double texting ?
Y: double texter SMH SMH SMH
Y Proceeds to then spam a half ton of unicode symbols that contain colors, more specifically yellow faces displaying Y's apparent annoyance for the double text, although it is evident they simply can't argue at X's level and are bothered by it.
--
(Note: 11 tons of TNT of power is referring to the MOAB's blast yield, which is (currently) the highest of any chemical/regular bombs. Nuclear bombs can reach much higher yields measured sometimes in the megatons because they convert mass into energy much more efficiently (Chemical bombs barely convert anything to E in E=MC² , while nuclear fission bombs reach 4% at best (which is still rather efficient compared to , for example, coal plants, which explains how optimal atomic plants are compared to something that barely releases any energy.))
by Scientistturnsintoapickle,dies July 4, 2020
Get the double textingmug. Phil - "Hey guys, we're about to go to Joe's house."
Zeek - "Does Joe know this, or are we just going to show up?"
Phil - "Yeah he knows. I sent him a preemptive text."
Jason - "Wanna' go to Steve's?"
Ralph - "Sure, but let him know or he won't answer the door."
Jason - "One preemptive text, coming up!"
Zeek - "Does Joe know this, or are we just going to show up?"
Phil - "Yeah he knows. I sent him a preemptive text."
Jason - "Wanna' go to Steve's?"
Ralph - "Sure, but let him know or he won't answer the door."
Jason - "One preemptive text, coming up!"
by Stickboy142 August 16, 2011
Get the Preemptive Textmug.