swank appeal

Attraction based on knowledge and appreciation for all things oozing with mid-century style. *bonus points for owning "all the things"

My gal has mad swank appeal.

by TrueFuckingLove June 20, 2016

Appealing to Christianity

This is what I mean about liberal being morons.

Hym "Stop appealing to Christianity. That isn't how the religion works. Jesus doesn't love trans. Like, no they aren't actually doing the religion but not doing the religion is part of the religion. 'God is on our side!' 'No ours!' I'll give you a hint: It's neither. You're just interpreting the word in a way mirrors your own desires. Is SO STUPID. It's just stupid."

by Hym Iam March 2, 2025

boxing appeal

This is used when youtubers can't accept they lost to a man with slenderman looking arms with no legs

Yo this washed ex Disney channel actor made and a big forehead 5"11' youtuber a boxing appeal, when he couldn't digest he lost to a SpongeBob looking aah mothafucka

by Furymeatrider December 2, 2023

pushing steel with sex appeal

How Greg with 2 Gs be pushing barges.

That’s how Greg earns them papers, by pushing steel with sex appeal.

by MrMrEZG July 20, 2025

Appeal to Kaffir Fallacy

An Appeal to Kaffir Fallacy is when someone (usually a Muslim) appeals to a disbeliever as a source instead of citing their own.

Guy Named Retirement: You cannot kill children in Islam
Guy Named Kay: What's the source?
Guy Named Retirement: Wally knows the source
Guy Named Kay" Aye! That's an Appeal to Kaffir Fallacy!

by wallacewest October 19, 2025

uniform appeal

For some reason you find your coworkers more attractive than outsiders, and you all wear the same uniform.

Every relationship I have starts off of that uniform appeal.

by mochimo August 16, 2011

Appeal to AI fallacy

Similar to the "appeal to authority fallacy," this occurs when an individual treats the output of an AI as absolute truth—rather than making their own argument—believing the AI to be a kind of deific superintelligence (perhaps more objective than any human authority). The information is accepted uncritically, without independent evaluation. This tendency is often observed among intellectually disengaged individuals online who are unable or unwilling to present a logically sound case of their own.

Tim: Presents a compelling case using his own reasoning.

Grug: “Oh yeah? Well, here’s what the AI said.” Posts erroneous AI output—likely without critically analyzing it.

Jon (onlooker): “There’s the appeal to AI fallacy again! Just because an AI made a claim, that doesn’t make it true—or even reasonable.”

by L Currie April 12, 2025