A TV programme, intended for educational or female/male health purposes, that shows (mainly female) people naked/semi naked.
Man 1 : "Did you watch that wankumentary last night? It was a programme about how women should check their breasts for lumps"
Man 2 : "Errr....no"
Man 2 : "Errr....no"
by MillsyKafer March 22, 2009
Get the Wankumentary mug.A verbal disagreement between 2 (or more) people, in which each person attempts to convince the other that they are correct. Usually results in neither person changing their view on the matter, which begs the question:
What purpose does it serve to have an argument when you know you won't change their opinion, and they know you won't change yours?
None, you idiot. There is no purpose in having an argument, besides entertainment to those around you for 5 minutes, before the spectators realize you are both just repeating your points raising your voices each time. Stop arguing, its a waste of time and energy.
What purpose does it serve to have an argument when you know you won't change their opinion, and they know you won't change yours?
None, you idiot. There is no purpose in having an argument, besides entertainment to those around you for 5 minutes, before the spectators realize you are both just repeating your points raising your voices each time. Stop arguing, its a waste of time and energy.
Having an argument is pointless
by watrulookingm8 November 2, 2020
Get the argument mug.Related Words
Argumentum ab Pseudoscientia, is a variation of the Argumentum ab Scientia, this is a kind of argument that seeks to consider an idea, hypothesis, concept or theory as invalid or false by using of possible flaws that exist inside it to consider it as “pseudoscientific” or even make comparisons with themes considered as “pseudosciences” such as climate denial, Flat Earth, antivax and so on. Argumentum ab Pseudoscientia is considered one of the main arguments using over the “Science Wars” and it’s even used nowadays in order to invalid opposite ideas, hypothesis, concepts and theories. A famous variation of the Argumentum ab Pseudoscientia is the Argumentum ab Fimbria, that’s a variation of the Argumentum ab Pseudoscientia but considering the theme as “fringe” or as “non-mainstream” for be considered as “invalid or false.
“The use of the Argumentum ab Pseudoscientia is really common nowadays, such as the uses of the Argumentum ab Fimbria, both kinds of arguments are well used nowadays by new atheists, anti-theists, scientificists and “skepticals” in order to invalid any idea or thing that’s opposite to them, and they use it all the time, mainly about potential evidences about multiverses, souls/spirits, consciousness, afterlife, extraphysics/nonphysics, existence of extraphysical life and so on, together with their confirmation bias as well.”
by Full Monteirism April 24, 2021
Get the Argumentum ab Pseudoscientia mug.An embarrassing but thoroughly entertaining argument on Facebook, either between Facebook friends, or strangers with very little knowledge of their privacy settings.
Little Johnny and slightly smaller Geoffles had a fargument on John's status, about size – while the entire Eastern Seaboard read on.
by (s)hipster November 18, 2013
Get the fargument mug.by tordon4lif February 11, 2020
Get the Argumenting mug.Logical fallacy. repetitive stating of discredited accusations, conspiracy theories, and unrelated events for the soul purpose of conflating them with attempts at logical discourse.
When I asked my son if the dishes were done he provided the Trumpian argument that Epstein didn't kill himself, and asked where the missing emails are.
by Mmechris January 25, 2020
Get the Trumpian argument mug.Strawman Arguments (I call them Stickman Arguments, sometimes) are arguments in which someone who you are debating takes your points and twists them to get ground on you in order to form a refutation in which they are correct.
Person A: *Signs on to start a topic saying:* For anyone out there who questions God because God doesn't always answer your prayers, the truth is: God doesn't help us because we have free will.
Person B: That's an unsound argument because it has no ground to stand on and it is overused. It's like saying, "What if I'm right and you're wrong and you go to Hell?" to an atheist.
Person A: We're not talking about Hell, therefore your refutation has no grounds.
Person B: Please take your strawman arguments somewhere else
Person A: You're going to burn in Hell for not believing in God!
Person A signs off.
Person B facepalms.
Person B: That's an unsound argument because it has no ground to stand on and it is overused. It's like saying, "What if I'm right and you're wrong and you go to Hell?" to an atheist.
Person A: We're not talking about Hell, therefore your refutation has no grounds.
Person B: Please take your strawman arguments somewhere else
Person A: You're going to burn in Hell for not believing in God!
Person A signs off.
Person B facepalms.
by Life's Outcast Of Death April 3, 2009
Get the Strawman Arguments mug.