Skip to main content

Random's syndrome

Random's syndrome does usually have mental issues or missing a parent figure
(mother/father)
The person having random's syndrome
be also called under term "Femboy"
The syndrome symptoms are wea
too much so called high thighs and
promoting/expressing so called "transsexuality" , mostly like to do on public
The person also might see for homosexual relationship with a person

This syndrome is very infectious and it spreads through internet fastly, mostly like to infect the "weak-minded" people
Random's syndrome
When a person dresses as so called "femboy" or promotes their ideas and identity on public, following the mentioned symptoms
by exoticemental February 26, 2024
mugGet the Random's syndrome mug.

Random Jones

(n) An insult used to describe someone who imparts an action that is deemed random through situational circumstances.
Person one: So we went to this party this weekend..
Person two: Girraffes!
Person one: Alright there Random Jones..
by Lou Desimone November 11, 2008
mugGet the Random Jones mug.

Random Train Boy

A person who shares the inherent interior essence of a locomotive engine and has a propensity for sporadic social tea drinking rituals, often leading to unforseen adventures with a stranger. Can be dangerous.
Never talk to strangers, especially not a Random Train Boy.
by RTG July 28, 2003
mugGet the Random Train Boy mug.

Random Movie Quote Disorder (RMQD)

Disorder in which someone randomly quotes a particular movie/scene from either a movie/show from time to time
"Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in the stew!" she says. "Did you just quote Lord of the Rings? You must have Random Movie Quote Disorder (RMQD)!" he replies.
by WassabiChild February 11, 2017
mugGet the Random Movie Quote Disorder (RMQD) mug.

Random

A annoying word for conversations or used to found a unpredictable thing like a random number generator also it is my first name so :(
Person 1: Hey Random
Random: Hello

Person 1:Hahah that so random
Person 2: Okay...
by Randomsnz April 29, 2024
mugGet the Random mug.

Determined or Random

I'm glad that you brought that up because it takes me to my second problem with determinism. Let's try and visualize your argument.

D

>ID - ID

R > R

ED
So, and action is either Random (R) or Determined. If it's Determined it's either Internally (ID) or Externally (ED) Determined. If it's Externally Determined, then you have no control. If it's Internally Determined, then the internal determination is either Determined or Random. And I'm guessing that by "Determined" you mean "The necessary byproduct of an antecedent chain in which the actor or mechanism could not have done otherwise," Correct? Is that close? Does that make sense? I feel like there are a lot of presuppositions that need to be unpacked.

Hym "So, how is asking whether or not something is determined or random any different than asking whether or not my bedroom is hot or cold? It's both. And neither. It's, like, luke warm. So, you presuppose the absence of a grey area between determined and random. That random and determine don't exist on a spectrum in the same way hot and cold exist on a spectrum. As though thinks can't be more or less determined or more or less random. Is the outcome of a coin to more or less random than the outcome of rolling a 20 sided dice? You could say that the outcome is determined I guess. By the exact about of force used to roll the dice or flip the coin.
The relationship between the material of the dice and the material of the surface of the table or the conditions of the air in the room you're flipping the coin. Also, if we accept 'determined' as 'the necessary byproduct of an antecedent chain in which the actor or mechanism could not have done otherwise' you presuppose that what happens in response to a given antecedent chain is what OUGHT to happen in response to said chain. So, Antecedent Chain A -> either Outcome A or Outcome B. If ACA -> OA then you have to presuppose that what ought to happen in response to ACA is OA. If ACA -> OB then, again, you're forced to presuppose that what ought a happen in response to ACA is OB. But if the likelihood of ACA leading to OB is 1% and it HAPPENS ANYWAY... What you have is NOT an outcome that 'couldn't have been otherwise' but, rather, SHOULD have been otherwise and wasn't. Ya feel me? So, I know this doesn't demonstrate free will but I don't think you have been able to successfully demonstrate that there isn't a point at which 'the self' is not the fundamental locus of control in any given choice. It's a good argument though. It's tricky. But it's like a weird semantic blackhole. It's like saying 'Well, if you don't actively control the firing of your neurons, you don't actually control yourself.' Just weird. Determined or random."
by Hym Iam December 5, 2023
mugGet the Determined or Random mug.

Random Object Narcissist

A person of moral disrepute who terrorize others by stealing things oblivious to the consequences.
“Why did he steal the grill off the car? What a hick!?”
“No he’s a Dick. He’s just a random object narcissist.”
by karmaneckwe October 13, 2025
mugGet the Random Object Narcissist mug.

Share this definition

Sign in to vote

We'll email you a link to sign in instantly.

Or

Check your email

We sent a link to

Open your email