A great invention that allows for guilt-free rawdawgging, fire-proof dick provides men with invisible protection against STD's and pregnancy. *Rarely used
Guy: "Ay Logan you been rawdawggin lately?"
Rawdawg champ: "Pshh what you think mayne?"
Guy: "Good thing you got that fire-proof dick"
Rawdawg champ: "...(smiles)"
Guy: "You didn't use it did you?"
Rawdawg champ: "It takes all the fun out of it. I like having that little 'challenge'.."
The concrete, harmful application of Proof Bigotry in social, professional, or institutional settings. It occurs when individuals or groups are excluded, penalized, or discredited because their beliefs, practices, or identities cannot be “proven” according to standards set by those in power. Proof discrimination can look like denying religious accommodation because belief in God cannot be empirically demonstrated, dismissing indigenous land claims because they are based on oral tradition rather than written deeds, or refusing to hire someone whose spiritual practice is deemed “unscientific.” It uses the rhetoric of evidence to justify what is essentially persecution.
Example: “The university denied her request for a meditation space, citing ‘lack of evidence that meditation has measurable benefits’—proof discrimination, using evidentiary standards to deny religious accommodation.”
A bias closely related to evidence defaultism, but focused specifically on the concept of “proof.” The proof defaultist assumes that unless a claim can be proven according to their own narrow, often impossibly strict criteria (e.g., mathematical certainty, absolute logical deduction), it is automatically false or not worth considering. This bias is common in debates about philosophy, religion, and metaphysics, where one side demands “proof” for the existence of God, consciousness, or objective morality, while ignoring that such domains rarely admit of proof in the mathematical sense. Proof defaultism weaponizes the ambiguity of “proof” to dismiss whole fields of inquiry.
Example: “He demanded proof that love is real, not just brainchemistry. When she offered experiential, relational, and behavioral evidence, he insisted that wasn’t ‘real proof.’ Proof defaultism: setting an impossible standard to avoid engagement.”
Phrase used to describe a factual situation where one is 100% sure they are correct. The proof part is just the evidence that eventually leads to trooF.
Hey Chuck, my nuts are the biggest in da world and I got proof of da trooF.