jiggysaw17's definitions
Almost like a rage quitter except they quit a game after only winning their first match. They usually quit because they know they are going to lose in a rematch, especially if they won by luck or some other circumstances such as bad internet connection. A win quitter is NOT someone who beats you fair and square and then gives you a rematch.
"We were playing a close game and he beat me with a cheap trick. I asked for a rematch but he refused. He's a win quitter."
by jiggysaw17 July 25, 2019

Republicans or conservatives who worship Donald Trump. The term MAGA (Make America Great Again) itself is a social campaign much like China's Great Leap Forward and instead of making America great, they made it into a shit show further dividing the country with hate and foolishness by believing anything Trump says.
"The MAGA republicans don't realize that they are in a cult movement and would drink the poison kool-aid if Donald Trump told them to."
by jiggysaw17 September 2, 2022

The zone before the friend zone.
"Bruh, I said hello to her and she just ignored me."
"Damn, you didn't even make it to The Hi Zone."
"Damn, you didn't even make it to The Hi Zone."
by jiggysaw17 December 29, 2020

by jiggysaw17 May 7, 2020

by jiggysaw17 February 11, 2019

To complete a game with any percentage of completion. Most commonly used for video game speed runners.
"You can beat Super Mario 64 by any% with 0 stars."
"What? I can only beat the game with 70 stars and I heard there's 120 stars all together!"
"What? I can only beat the game with 70 stars and I heard there's 120 stars all together!"
by jiggysaw17 November 21, 2018

A conspiracy theory that says the 6 moon landings were filmed in a Hollywood set or TV studio.
So hiring and paying 400,000+ "actors" to play scientists, engineers, technicians, doctors, factory workers, ground control staff, air space operators, astronomers, administration staff, security officers, astronauts, janitors, etc...to fake a moon landing movie in a span of 11 years and keep it a big juicy secret for almost 50 years sound reasonable?
Spending $109 BILLION dollars (adjusted to inflation) to make rockets and space crafts and then document the whole Apollo Program from 1961-1972 with thousands upon thousands of photographic evidence and footage only to fake the moon landing on a Hollywood movie set sound reasonable?
Spending $504 million dollars to launch a satellite in 2009 called the LRO that orbits the moon and has photographic evidence of all 6 moon landings, only to fake it with Photoshop sound reasonable?
Are you saying that since 1961 NOT one single whistleblower pulled an Edward Snowden, leave the country, and tell the world NASA is a fraud?
Are you implying that the Soviets were too stupid to figure out the Apollo Program was fake?
The most important question to ask any conspiracy theorist is "What kind of evidence do you need to make you think otherwise?" If you provide the evidence and they are still not convinced, you are wasting your time.
So hiring and paying 400,000+ "actors" to play scientists, engineers, technicians, doctors, factory workers, ground control staff, air space operators, astronomers, administration staff, security officers, astronauts, janitors, etc...to fake a moon landing movie in a span of 11 years and keep it a big juicy secret for almost 50 years sound reasonable?
Spending $109 BILLION dollars (adjusted to inflation) to make rockets and space crafts and then document the whole Apollo Program from 1961-1972 with thousands upon thousands of photographic evidence and footage only to fake the moon landing on a Hollywood movie set sound reasonable?
Spending $504 million dollars to launch a satellite in 2009 called the LRO that orbits the moon and has photographic evidence of all 6 moon landings, only to fake it with Photoshop sound reasonable?
Are you saying that since 1961 NOT one single whistleblower pulled an Edward Snowden, leave the country, and tell the world NASA is a fraud?
Are you implying that the Soviets were too stupid to figure out the Apollo Program was fake?
The most important question to ask any conspiracy theorist is "What kind of evidence do you need to make you think otherwise?" If you provide the evidence and they are still not convinced, you are wasting your time.
Conspiracy Nut: "I believe in the moon hoax and people never landed on the moon."
Average IQ person: "What kind of evidence do you need?"
Conspiracy Nut: "Pictures"
Average IQ person: "Google them!"
Conspiracy Nut: "Not enough"
Average IQ Person: "Don't ever talk to me again."
Average IQ person: "What kind of evidence do you need?"
Conspiracy Nut: "Pictures"
Average IQ person: "Google them!"
Conspiracy Nut: "Not enough"
Average IQ Person: "Don't ever talk to me again."
by jiggysaw17 April 1, 2017
