A member (or sympathizer) of the republican cartel currently occupying the White House. Believe that the U.S. should be a one-party theorocracy. Radical christians, racists, misogynists, and greedy CEO's make up the bulk of the Nazipublican party. Their tactics of supression, intimidation, and fear closely match those of the third reich. They are a unified threat and must be destroyed.
Racism, torture, suppression, oppression, tyrany, an enslaved middle class, perpetual war, loyalty oaths, massive debt, revisionist reality, restricted press, hyper-nationalism and threats against decent Americans. Yup. Looks like the Nazipublicans are in charge.
by spot December 31, 2004
by Spot March 10, 2004
An affordable 4-door sedan or wagon manufactured by Subaru of America (SOA) between 1991 and 2005. New for 2005 is the reintroduction of turbocharging to the already potent "boxer" engine. Often defined as a "sleeper" the new Legacy will embarrass cars costing twice as much while hauling your groceries.
by Spot March 02, 2005
The act or state of being a log and pudding at the same time while holding your leg with your left hand and making loud honking noises through your nose.
by Spot January 12, 2005
A social disposition that concludes that the only thing worse than abortion is the government having the authority to tell you whether you will/will not have one.
Many, if not most pro-choice believers do not relish abortion, but are committed to keeping the government out of our bedrooms, sex lives, and nurseries.
Although to a typical black/white, bible-thumping, attack dog anti-choice fundie, this automatically means that a pro-choicer not only loves abortions, but has obviously had several. Not true.
Many, if not most pro-choice believers do not relish abortion, but are committed to keeping the government out of our bedrooms, sex lives, and nurseries.
Although to a typical black/white, bible-thumping, attack dog anti-choice fundie, this automatically means that a pro-choicer not only loves abortions, but has obviously had several. Not true.
by spot August 25, 2004
A locical fallacy in which the arguementative point is made into a caracature of it's original point. Extremely effective because it's not based on facts, but lies and assumptions. The burden of proof then lies in the defense, not the offense. Especially effective when the defense isn't allowed to offer objection. Popularized by right wing talk radio hosts Rush and Hannity.
Step one: Build the straw man. Ignore facts and make outlandish lies/slander. Redefine the facts. "liberals want to take your guns away and turn the U.S. over to the U.N."
Step 2: Knock down the straw man. "That flies in the face of everything we Americans believe in."
Step 3: Connect step 2 to step 1. "Only a communist would think of something like that."
Step 4: "Negate" your opponant by opposing the conclusion in step 3. "I hate those liberal communists. If they think us right-wingers will sit quietly while they destroy the country the're dead wrong."
Step one: Build the straw man. Ignore facts and make outlandish lies/slander. Redefine the facts. "liberals want to take your guns away and turn the U.S. over to the U.N."
Step 2: Knock down the straw man. "That flies in the face of everything we Americans believe in."
Step 3: Connect step 2 to step 1. "Only a communist would think of something like that."
Step 4: "Negate" your opponant by opposing the conclusion in step 3. "I hate those liberal communists. If they think us right-wingers will sit quietly while they destroy the country the're dead wrong."
Rush and Hannity can't argue the facts, so they have to make up the "evil liberal agenda" and then appear patriotic by opposing it.
by spot December 06, 2004
A pointless, costly, unwinnable war in the desert in 2003 that largely resembles another pointless, costly, unwinnable war in the jungle in 1969.
I'm so glad that the "shock and awe" tactics worked, and that we actually found the WMD's. I was worried that it would turn into Iraqinam!
by spot May 19, 2004