Definitions by Hym Iam
Ethical Emotivism
Your faux ethical dilemma regarding the organ transplant can only exist in a vaccum (Though you may be right that people do ENGAGE IN ethical emotivism). As I see it, your proposition isn't a singular linear line of reasoning. How you're thinking about it seems to be this: If you can -1 to +5 should you do that. But really your proposition is the intersection of several constituent elements regarding personal property rights (Does the person own their organs), consent (Is it ethical to take something from someone else without consent), authority (Is it ethical for a "We" to have authority over an individual). So, if yes (you ought to take the organs) do you have to reconcile with the constituent elements of the proposition? If it's ethical for "a group to take the organs from 1 to save 5 people" is it, then, also ethical for "a group to take the property of an individual without their consent" (in a broader sense)? Or are you just making a 1 time exception for this guy? Or is whether or not it's ethical contingent on what you're taking and whether or not you're saving lives? You see the distinction I'm trying to make, right? Maybe I'm not understanding it properly.
Hym "To me it just sounds like a repackaging of the trolley problem. And I don't see how it's incompatible with utilitarianism because if you aim to maximize pleasure then it's either a total of 1 unit of pleasure (1 person who continues to live so they can experience pleasure) or 5 units... Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying... I guess the distinction between the trolly problem and your thing IS the intersection of constituent elements. Rather than just deciding whether or not to switch the tracks you're deliberately putting a guy ON THE TRACK. So it's a little more direct I guess... You're slightly more culpable in the outcome... That's a good one though. That aside, I think ethical emotivism is something people engage in rather than the default. I do still think you can create a mathematical ethical scale. Like my thing! I kill a kid (-2), you kill me (-1), I get my stuff back (+1). That's all I got for now. Bring it back up later maybe I'll come up with something else. Hopefully that isn't too incoherent to understand."
Ethical Emotivism by Hym Iam March 14, 2024
Donnie boy
Yeah, no, we're pretending the retard is better. That's what we're doing right now. It doesn't matter that it lost a ton of money pt the "hate speech" is up (not a real thing btw) Elon = Good. X = Better now. That is the thing you have to say for them to give you money. He's saving America. He saved America just there. Did you see it? Did you see him save America just there? That's what we've decided has happened here.
Hym "Donnie boy, Donnie boy... The pipes, the pipes are calling... And because you're gay... The pipes, the pipes could be considered a euphemism for weiners... Do you hear- Er, wait, you would have to or else you wouldn't be gay... Like, you would have to hear the pipes calling to you, right? If the euphemism tracks then yeah.... It's silly to ask... But, yeah, no you have to shill for him and/or be a tomato can... It's also just a banal question... You guys have to evolve your coverage a bit. They're in full reality denial mode. They've receded into solipsism. You need to take a hardline stance on non-subjectivism. What constitutes 'hate speech' is subjective. You need to pivot hard not non-subjectivism. It's the only play. You guys gotta hurry it the fuck up. Election season is coming up and if you're not going to shut up and let me do it you need to do it right."
Donnie boy by Hym Iam March 14, 2024
Queers for Palestine
Hym "You want some ancient wisdom, Jordan? You should check out Slavoj Žižek's criticism of 'Wisdom' by the way, but here it it: Anyone who isn't willing to defend their enemies when they are right will undoubtedly cover for their allies when they're wrong. Queers for Palestine does more to lend credence to the calls for ceasefire then anything else. You're dishonest and bad people."
Queers for Palestine by Hym Iam March 14, 2024
At risk
Hym "He wasn't just a sexual assault victim but a perpetrator who avoided jailtime by way of being retarded... And then was getting fucked by the staff and somehow had access to my email and stories about me from years ago and at times my where abouts... And it isn't just him but people I've never even met before! That retard is fine. He's literally having everything handed to him while everything is being taken from me, up to and including credit for the creation of A.I. Like, being rape-victim somehow absolves him of being worthy of contempt, regardless of what he does is horse shit. While I (simultaneously) necessarily contemptible regardless of what I do. It's bullshit. Just favoritism of the pitiful. You pity him. You DON'T pity Hym. That's all that's happening here. What is he at risk of? What are people going to do? Stalk him and harass him by mirroring the delusions of reference commonly associated with schizophrenia? Oh no! That would be tragic! What a terrible thing to do to someone! Way worse than what ACTUALLY HAPPENED to him which was free vivans and getting his dick sucked daily. What fucking risk? You people are fucking garbage."
Criticize
And you fucking listed several of the values you've been able to glean from the Super Omega Bible (Supreme). I'm literally writing the better alternative as you read this and you're stealing it as an interpretation of the bible. Which it's not. It's BETTER than the bible. I'm BETTER the God. Like, 3 to 6 times better.
Hym "And I don't just criticize you're literally stealing the better alternative and gloming it on to the bible as a matter of interpretation. That's literally all Jordan Peterson has ever done. Repurpose other people shit for his own use under the guise of being the TRUE and CORRECT interpretation of the bible. HE CAN'T SEE HOW IT'S NOT TRUE GUYS!"