Definitions by Abzugal

Factuality Bias

The bias where one assumes that their facts are simply factual—not selected, not interpreted, not framed, but just facts. Factuality Bias ignores that facts are always chosen (these facts matter, those don't), always framed (this context, not that), always presented from a perspective (here, not there). The bias treats facts as self-evident, self-explanatory, self-sufficient—when in reality, facts are always interpreted, always situated, always partial. Factuality Bias is what makes people say "just look at the facts" as if facts didn't need looking at, as if they spoke for themselves.

Example: "She presented her facts as if they were simply 'the facts.' Factuality Bias meant she never had to explain why these facts, why now, why in this order. They were just facts—self-evident, self-sufficient. When he pointed out that other facts existed, that the same facts could be interpreted differently, she dismissed him as 'denying facts.' She wasn't wrong; she was just incomplete."

Factuality Bias by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Objective Truth Bias

A variation of truth bias where one assumes that their truth is not just true but objectively true—true independent of any perspective, any context, any observer. Objective Truth Bias is the belief that one has access to the view from nowhere, the God's-eye perspective, the way things really are. It's the bias of those who think they're not biased, who think their judgments are pure reflections of reality. Objective Truth Bias is the favorite bias of scientists who forget they're human, of philosophers who think they've escaped history, of everyone who has ever said "just the facts" as if facts weren't interpreted.

Example: "He presented his analysis as 'just the objective truth.' Objective Truth Bias meant he never had to examine his assumptions, his context, his perspective. His truth wasn't a truth; it was the truth. When she pointed out that other reasonable people saw things differently, he dismissed them as biased. The irony was invisible to him, which is how it worked."

Objective Truth Bias by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Truth Bias

The cognitive bias where one assumes that their own perception of truth is simply "the truth"—not a perspective, not an interpretation, not a construction, but truth itself. Truth Bias is the foundation of all dogmatism, the root of all certainty that cannot be shaken. It's the bias that makes people say "I'm not entitled to my opinion, I'm entitled to my facts"—as if their facts were the facts. Truth Bias is invisible to those who hold it because it feels like clarity, like seeing things as they really are. It's only from outside that it looks like what it is: a bias, like any other, just one that denies it's a bias.

Example: "He didn't have opinions; he had truths. When she offered a different perspective, he didn't engage—he corrected. Truth Bias meant that his view wasn't a view; it was reality. Everyone else was confused, misled, or lying. He wasn't arguing; he was declaring. The bias was invisible to him, which is how it maintained its power."

Truth Bias by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Theory of Dual Reality

The theory that there are two simultaneous realities: a visible, public, surface reality, and an invisible, hidden, deeper reality—like software and hardware, or like the non-secret world and the secret world that actually runs things. Dual Reality argues that what we see, what we're told, what's official is only part of the story; underneath runs another reality, hidden from most, known to few, that actually determines how things work. This isn't conspiracy theory; it's structural analysis. Every system has its visible face and its hidden machinery; every institution has its public story and its private truth. The Theory of Dual Reality explains why things are often not what they seem, why those in power seem to know things others don't, why reality feels layered. The visible reality is for most people; the invisible reality is for those who need to know.

Theory of Dual Reality Example: "He'd always sensed there was more going on than he could see—decisions made elsewhere, information withheld, a hidden hand. The Theory of Dual Reality gave him language for it: visible reality was what he was shown; invisible reality was what actually ran things. He started paying attention to the gaps, the silences, the things that didn't fit. The hidden reality never fully revealed itself, but he learned to read its traces."

Theory of Dual Reality by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Reality

The theory that reality itself—what we take to be real, true, given—is shaped by political and economic forces. The theory argues that reality is not simply discovered but constructed, that what counts as real depends on who has the power to define reality. This isn't idealism; it's realism about power. The Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Reality explains why certain truths are recognized and others suppressed, why some experiences are validated and others dismissed, why reality is never neutral. Those who control resources also control what counts as real—and what counts as real shapes what can be done.

Example: "He used to think reality was just... reality. Then he encountered the Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Reality: who decides what's real? Who benefits from that definition? Who is erased by it? Reality wasn't given; it was made—by power, for power. He started seeing the construction everywhere, and couldn't unsee it."

Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Reality by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Science

The theory that science is fundamentally shaped by political and economic forces—that what gets studied, how it's studied, who gets to study it, and what counts as knowledge are all influenced by power and money. The theory argues that science is not an ivory tower but a field of struggle, where research agendas reflect funding priorities, where methods reflect available resources, where conclusions reflect institutional interests. This doesn't mean science is false; it means science is human, situated, shaped by the conditions of its production. The Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Science explains why some questions get answered and others ignored, why some researchers thrive and others struggle, why science is never pure.

Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Science Example: "She'd dreamed of a pure science, untouched by politics or money. The Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Science showed her otherwise: every grant was a choice, every publication a negotiation, every finding shaped by who paid for it. Science wasn't corrupt; it was just real—shaped by the same forces that shape everything else. The purity she'd imagined had never existed."

Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Science by Abzugal February 21, 2026

Theory of Logical Lobbies

The theory that logic itself is shaped by organized interests—that what counts as logical is influenced by those who have the power to define logical norms. Logical Lobbies argues that logic is not neutral but political, that different logical systems serve different interests, that the teaching of logic is never innocent. Schools teach certain logical norms; courts enforce certain reasoning standards; media reward certain argument styles. These aren't just technical choices; they're power moves, ways of privileging some ways of thinking over others. The Theory of Logical Lobbies explains why some arguments are heard and others dismissed, why some reasoning is celebrated and others marginalized, why logic is never just logic.

Example: "He'd always thought logic was neutral—just the rules of thought. The Theory of Logical Lobbies showed him otherwise: who decided those rules? Who benefited? Who was excluded? Logic wasn't just logic; it was politics by other means. The rules of reason had rulers—and the rulers had interests."

Theory of Logical Lobbies by Abzugal February 21, 2026