look up any word, like ratchet:
 
50.
A theory made of "discoveries" by Charles Darwin and others in that field from different time periods that include the "facts" that birds and bananas are related(We are somewhere in there too). There are also theories that say, that there's a geologic column in the dirt, where all forms of life that don't exist today are buried, and that this geologic column holds the records of Evolution. When it is never in the right order and never will be, in fact, in some parts of the world, it's backwards.
"Hey mark. Did you know that we came froma slug?"

"That makes so much sense!!!" Says Mark

"Yeah It's called Evolution"

"Wow that's incredible. Let's make it our religion from now on and worship everyone who helped make this happen, and despise, and ridicule everyone who doesn't believe in it."

"HAIL HITLER!!!!!"
by Oh the glorious questions November 18, 2009
 
51.
It was thought up by Charles Darwin and it goes something like this. In the beginning we were all fish. M'kay? Swimming around in the water. And then one day a couple of fish had a retard baby and the retard baby was different so it got to live. The retard fish goes on to make more retard babies and one day a retard baby fish crawled out of the ocean with his "mutant fish hands" and it had butt sex with a squirrel or something and made this--Retard frog-squirrel and then that had a retard baby which was a monkey-fish-frog and then this monkey-fish-frog has butt sex with this monkey and that monkey had a mutant retard baby that screwed another monkey and that made you. So there you go. You're the retarded offspring of 5 retarded monkeys having butt sex with a fish.


Evolution is stupid. M'kay?
by RJones306 March 03, 2009
 
52.
Dis-proven theory, mainly because of human stupidity, and ability to reject and deny facts, that contradicts oneself's personnal beliefs, which are based on a book written by people who tried to teach good values, but were misunderstood.
(TheEasyWay, about Evolution)

A dis-proven hypothesis, which still has large support in the "scientific" community. This is purely due to the reason that people simply wants to believe in it, as it entitles them of no moral responsibility whatsoever.

The hypothesis says, that all species evolved over time from a single common ancestor, through gradual beneficial variations, which has accumulated over millions of years.

This hypothesis is invalid due to the following:

The eye, ear and any other irreducibly complex systems could not have evolved by "slight beneficial variations" as each part is completely and utterly worthless if simple one of the pieces are missing.

Many more scientific counter-evidences can be presented, though the above should be enough for any honest supporter of evolution to abandon the hypothesis.

This logical evidence disproving evolution has not posed much of a problem, due to the fact that supporters of the hypothesis have suspended the use of logic and rationality.

The supporters of evolution have, in their desperate search for evidence to back up the hypothesis, uncovered more than 100 million fossils, all showing that species appeared suddenly, out of nowhere and fully formed, not by gradual changes.

The few so called transitional forms that have been uncovered are simply birds with teeth claimed to come from dinosaurs, dogs with wider tails claimed to be whales and humans with slightly smaller skull capacity claimed to be apes.
by ICallBS July 06, 2011
 
53.
1. A theory about how humans came to be.
2. Excrement.
Yo man, I took an evolution in the toilet the other day.
by fatboy_bake March 30, 2011
 
54.
In the beginning, we were all fish, okay, swimming around in the water. And then one day a couple of fish had a retard baby. And the retard baby was different so it got to live. So retard fish goes on to make more retard babies, and then one day a retard baby fish crawled out of the ocean with its mutant fish hands, and it had butt sex with a squirrel or something, and made this retard-frog-squirrel and then that had a retard baby which was a monkey-fish-frog, and then this monkey-fish-frog had butt sex with that monkey and that monkey had a mutant retard baby that screwed another monkey and that made you. So there you go. You're the retarded offspring of five monkeys having butt sex with a fish-squirrel. Congratulations
Now I for one think that evolution is a bunch of bull crap. But I've been told I have to teach it anyway. It was thought up by Charles Darwin
by Mr. Garrison October 28, 2007
 
55.
A story that people made up so they don't have to do what God says. I'm not going to reiterate all the facts that others have shown disproving Evolution because... well they've already disproved it.

There is a creature that can perform amazing feats:

survive the vacuum of space
survive 6000 atmospheres of pressure
survive temperatures of 1 degree Centigrade above Absolute Zero
survive radiation doses lethel to humans (500+times)
survive for many years without water

What is this creature? It's called the waterbear and this mighty little creature on its own can disprove evolution.

Why did evolution "decide" to give this little creature those amazing abilities? Theres really no reason, these creatures won't find themselves in any of these conditions on Earth.

Someone here said that a bug's ability to become immune to pesticides is evolution. It's not evolution, that's ability to adjust to surroundings, nothing about the DNA is changed.

Downe Syndrome is an example of mutation. Downe Syndrome is not good its destructive.

Some people say that scientists have made life in labs. Well first off, they haven't. Second, they can't*. And third even if they could all that would prove is that it took an intelligent being to start it all.

* My dad installs blinds. He installed blinds for a man names Saran Narang, a world renowned biologist and he said that Man cannot make a drop of milk because it is living.

(This is probably going to get 300 thumbs down despite the fact that what I've said is all true.)
Since people don't want to be told what to do they made up Evolution.
by a competent person September 15, 2008
 
56.
Where did the space for the universe come from?
Where did matter come from?
Where did the laws of the universe come from (gravity, inertia, etc.)?
How did matter get so perfectly organized?
Where did the energy come from to do all the organizing?
When, where, why, and how did life come from non-living matter?
When, where, why, and how did life learn to reproduce itself?
With what did the first cell capable of sexual reproduction reproduce?
Why would any plant or animal want to reproduce more of its kind since this would only make more mouths to feed and decrease the chances of survival? (Does the individual have a drive to surviv e, or the species? How do you explain this?)
How can mutations (recombining of the genetic code) create any new, improved varieties? (Recombining English letters will never produce Chinese books.)
Is it possible that similarities in design between different animals prove a common Creator instead of a common ancestor?
Natural selection only works with the genetic information available and tends only to keep a species stable. How would you explain the increasing complexity in the genetic code that must have occ urred if evolution were true?
When, where, why, and how did:
Single-celled plants become multi-celled? (Where are the two and three-celled intermediates?)
Single-celled animals evolve?
Fish change to amphibians?
Amphibians change to reptiles?
Reptiles change to birds? (The lungs, bones, eyes, reproductive organs, heart, method of locomotion, body covering, etc., are all very different!)
How did the intermediate forms live?
When, where, why, how, and from what did:
Whales evolve?
Sea horses evolve?
Bats evolve?
Eyes evolve?
Ears evolve?
Hair, skin, feathers, scales, nails, claws, etc., evolve?
Which evolved first (how, and how long; did it work without the others)?
The digestive system, the food to be digested, the appetite, the ability to find and eat the food, the digestive juices, or the body’s resistance to its own digestive juice (stomach, intestines, etc.)?
The drive to reproduce or the ability to reproduce?
The lungs, the mucus lining to protect them, the throat, or the perfect mixture of gases to be breathed into the lungs?
DNA or RNA to carry the DNA message to cell parts?
The termite or the flagella in its intestines that actually digest the cellulose?
The plants or the insects that live on and pollinate the plants?
The bones, ligaments, tendons, blood supply, or muscles to move the bones?
The nervous system, repair system, or hormone system?
The immune system or the need for it?
There are many thousands of examples of symbiosis that defy an evolutionary explanation. Why must we teach students that evolution is the only explanation for these relationships?
How would evolution explain mimicry? Did the plants and animals develop mimicry by chance, by their intelligent choice, or by design?
When, where, why, and how did man evolve feelings? Love, mercy, guilt, etc. would never evolve in the theory of evolution.
*How did photosynthesis evolve?
*How did thought evolve?
*How did flowering plants evolve, and from that?
*What kind of evolutionist are you? Why are you not one of the other eight or ten kinds?
What would you have said fifty years ago if I told you I had a living coelacanth in my aquarium?
*Is there one clear prediction of macroevolution that has proved true?
*What is so scientific about the idea of hydrogen as becoming human?
*Do you honestly believe that everything came from nothing?
After you have answered the preceding questions, please look carefully at your answers and thoughtfully consider the following questions.

Are you sure your answers are reasonable, right, and scientifically provable, or do you just believe that it may have happened the way you have answered? (Do these answers reflect your religion or your science?)
Do your answers show more or less faith than the person who says, "God must have designed it"?
Is it possible that an unseen Creator designed this universe? If God is excluded at the beginning of the discussion by your definition of science, how could it be shown that He did create the universe if He did?
Is it wise and fair to present the theory of evolution to students as fact?
What is the end result of a belief in evolution (lifestyle, society, attitude about others, eternal destiny, etc.)?
Do people accept evolution because of the following factors?
It is all they have been taught.
They like the freedom from God (no moral absolutes, etc.).
They are bound to support the theory for fear of losing their job or status or grade point average.
They are too proud to admit they are wrong.
Evolution is the only philosophy that can be used to justify their political agenda.
Should we continue to use outdated, disproved, questionable, or inconclusive evidences to support the theory of evolution because we don’t have a suitable substitute (Piltdown man, recapitulation, archaeopteryx, Lucy, Java man, Neanderthal man, horse evolution, vestigial organs, etc.)?
Should parents be allowed to require that evolution not be taught as fact in their school system unless equal time is given to other theories of origins (like divine creation)?
What are you risking if you are wrong? As one of my debate opponents said, "Either there is a God or there is not. Both possibilities are frightening."
Why are many evolutionists afraid of the idea of creationism being presented in public schools? If we are not supposed to teach religion in schools, then why not get evolution out of the textbooks? It is just a religious worldview.
Aren’t you tired of faith in a system that cannot be true? Wouldn’t it be great to know the God who made you, and to accept His love and forgiveness?
Would you be interested, if I showed you from the Bible, how to have your sins forgiven and how to know for sure that you are going to Heaven? If so, call me.
The evolution of:
Single-celled animals evolve?
Fish change to amphibians?
Amphibians change to reptiles?
Reptiles change to birds? (The lungs, bones, eyes, reproductive organs, heart, method of locomotion, body covering, etc., are all very different!
by kawi99k July 09, 2006