Skip to main content

Postmodernist Art 

Pointless, ugly, unpleasant dribble that could enter a competition against found garbage and still lose made by talent-less posers steeped in smug, self-affirming attitudes of rebellion and uniqueness, while in fact being neither rebellious nor unique.
You can't thrash on the floor and make screeching noises in the MoMA and call it postmodernist art. It's not edgy and nihilistic, you just suck too much to actually make anything.
Postmodernist Art mug front
Get the Postmodernist Art mug.
See more merch

Postmodernist Scumbag 

Hey dude, is there anyone alive who isn't some postmodernist scumbag?

postmodernist construct 

a meaningless, ridiculous, or counter-factual idea that has been created and promoted by pretentious, logically-challenged people
Intersectionality is a postmodernist construct

Postmodernist Logico-Epistemology

A framework influenced by postmodern thinkers (Lyotard, Derrida, Foucault) that radically questions the foundations of Western logic and epistemology. It rejects grand narratives of reason, progress, and truth, arguing that what passes for knowledge is always tied to power and language games. Postmodernist logico‑epistemology often deconstructs binary oppositions (true/false, rational/irrational) and reveals the excluded middle or the incommensurable. It does not offer a new logical system but rather a critical stance toward all claims of epistemic certainty, embracing irony, play, and the irreducible otherness of the real.
Postmodernist Logico-Epistemology Example: “Her postmodernist logico‑epistemology analysis showed that the ‘fact/value’ distinction collapses under scrutiny—facts are always already laden with values, and values make truth claims.”

Theory of Postmodernist Epistemology

A framework drawing on postmodern thought that questions grand narratives of knowledge, exposes power relations embedded in knowing, deconstructs binary oppositions (objective/subjective, fact/value), and attends to marginalized ways of knowing. Postmodernist Epistemology doesn't deny that knowledge is possible—it denies that any knowledge comes from nowhere, serves everyone equally, or stands outside history. It studies how knowledge is produced through discourse, how power shapes what counts as true, and how excluded voices haunt the epistemic canon. It's epistemology that has taken the critical turn and refuses to pretend innocence.
Theory of Postmodernist Epistemology "You think science is pure truth-seeking. Postmodernist Epistemology asks: who funded the research? Whose interests does it serve? Who wasn't in the room? Not because science is wrong—because pretending it's innocent is dangerous. Knowledge always has politics. Postmodernism just refuses to look away."

Theory of Postmodernist Science

A framework drawing on postmodern thought that questions grand narratives of scientific progress, exposes power relations embedded in scientific practice, deconstructs binary oppositions (nature/culture, objective/subjective), and attends to marginalized voices excluded from scientific discourse. Postmodernist Science doesn't deny that science produces knowledge—it denies that this knowledge comes from nowhere, serves everyone equally, or stands outside history. It studies how scientific truth is produced through discourse, how power shapes research agendas, and how excluded perspectives haunt the scientific canon. It's science studies that has taken the critical turn.
Theory of Postmodernist Science "You think science is pure truth-seeking. Postmodernist Science asks: who funds the research? Whose questions get asked? Who benefits? Not because science is wrong—because pretending it's innocent is naive. Science always has politics. Postmodernism just refuses to look away."

Theory of Postmodernist Sciences

A framework applying postmodern critique to the plurality of sciences—questioning grand narratives about scientific unity, exposing power relations embedded in disciplinary boundaries, deconstructing hierarchies among sciences, and attending to marginalized sciences excluded from the canon. Postmodernist Sciences doesn't deny that sciences produce knowledge—it denies that the current configuration of sciences is natural, inevitable, or complete. It studies how disciplines form, how boundaries are drawn, how some sciences become prestigious while others are marginalized, and how excluded knowledges haunt the scientific field.
Theory of Postmodernist Sciences "You think the current sciences are just natural categories. Postmodernist Sciences asks: why physics at the top? Why is some knowledge 'science' and other knowledge 'tradition'? These aren't natural; they're historical, political. Postmodernism doesn't reject sciences—it asks why they're arranged this way, who benefits, and what's been excluded. The questions are uncomfortable; that's the point."