Meta-Science

The science of science itself—studying how research is done, published, and becomes accepted knowledge. It's the practice of applying scientific methods to the scientific process to uncover its flaws: publication bias, p-hacking, the replication crisis, and how grant funding shapes what gets studied. Meta-scientists are the mechanics looking under the hood of the knowledge-making machine, often finding duct tape and questionable wiring. It’s a field born from the realization that science is a human institution, with all the attendant biases and inefficiencies, and needs its own peer review.

*Example: "A meta-science study revealed that 60% of psychology studies couldn't be replicated. The researchers then did a meta-study on that finding to see if it was replicable. It's turtles—and slightly depressing statistics—all the way down."*

by Abzugal January 30, 2026

Meta-Sciences

The collective disciplines that take a step back to analyze the foundations, methods, and implications of various scientific fields. This includes philosophy of science, history of science, sociology of scientific knowledge, and data about data (meta-data analysis). It’s the humanities’ revenge on STEM, asking not just "what do we know?" but "how do we know we know it, who decided, and what power structures were in the room when they did?"

Example: "His degree in Meta-Sciences meant he could deconstruct a physics paper's conclusion, not by arguing the math, but by analyzing the funding sources, the editorial board of the journal, and the historical context of the paradigm it relied on. He was exhausting at parties."

by Abzugal January 30, 2026