sarchasm

the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it

one of the winners in the Washington Post's Style Invitational - words altered by adding, subtracting, or changing only one letter and supplying a new definition

by dp916 March 17, 2004

Sarcasm

The connection between the author of wit and the person who doesn't get it.

Sarcasm at its prime:

"I'm sorry, i thought we were having a state the obvious contest here"

"I'd agree with you but then we'd both be wrong"

"Let me know if anything I say offends you; I may want to offend you again later"

by "Like this needs your input"" April 26, 2009

cyber-sarcasm

ineffective use of sarcastic remarks sent via instant message or text

joe3434:hey i found 20 bucks today
frank1212:oh ya? how was that?
joe3434:terrible
frank1212:really?why?
joe3434:it wasnt...i was using cyber-sarcasm

by T O double D April 24, 2008

carried sarcasm

sarcasm that is played out longer than one witty remark and the person being sarcastic never confesses that he was being sarcastic; undying sarcasm

Jenny: How was the smoothie?
Salman: It was Amazing! You are a smoothie genius.
Jenny: Really?
Salman: Yeah! I just love the fact that it was warm and that you used raw fruits instead of ripe fruits. And adding salt was the greatest idea ever. Splendid!
Jenny: I'm glad you like it.
Salman: I freaking LOVE IT! I love salt in my smoothies.
Jenny: I honestly did not think that it was that good.
Salman: Oh trust me friend it was Genius.
{this is carried sarcasm because the smoothie was obviously terrible}

by Sally Vally May 27, 2011

Sarchasmatic

Of, or being both sarcastic, and charismatic simultaneously.

He was overly sarcastic, and charismatic... sarchasmatic if you will.

by Richard Nelson October 26, 2005

sarcasmeter

A fictional device used to detect sarcasm.

Person 1: Miley Cyrus is so talented!
Person 2: WTF, no way.
Person 1: Wow, I think your sarcasmeter is broken.

by YellowyEyes August 28, 2008

Sarcasmicus

A rare breed of humans that have the ability to take any given situation and peel it apart layer by layer and reconstruct it in a manner that is less than palatable to the "normal" populous. Often referred to as the lowest form of "wit" in the past is now being re considered as an evolutionary advance in the human condition. It is now thought to be more prevalent in persons afflicted with disorder of ADD or ADHD which is also now being considered and evolutionary advancement of the human brain as a direct result of the global industrial advancements over the past few centuries which has essential caused a leap frog effect in the human mind causing it to operate of higher more efficient levels of intellect. Which is often why persons afflicted with these "disabilities" are often miss understood. So the question could become are they really the disabled persons because they are not the norm! or will their numbers eventually surpass "the normal people" thus making the "normal" few! hence forth majority rules and is the "norm" something to think about

Oh says one of the "Sarcasmicus" breed "because I could not do that myself! thanks!

by IheartADD March 8, 2011