Wahmen "How does it feel to know you made women cry?"
Hym "You wouldn't be crying if you would have did what I told you to and you weren't doing what you're doing. Instead you are teaming up with these pieces of shit to do this to me and how is it working for you? You're crying again. Stupid bitch."
Hym "You wouldn't be crying if you would have did what I told you to and you weren't doing what you're doing. Instead you are teaming up with these pieces of shit to do this to me and how is it working for you? You're crying again. Stupid bitch."
by Hym Iam December 31, 2024
Get the How does it feel to know you made women cry? mug.A retarded Youtube channel that is less active then Pyrocynical and does retarded content like Roblox and Minecraft. What a cunt.
by EYEofFIRE10 June 7, 2018
Get the Alex Does Video Games mug.A website that publishes only verified, anonymous narratives in efforts of repairing civil discourse.
"Wow, did you see what The Doe posted the other day? They grabbed a story out of someone from the Astroworld incident."
by thedoe November 23, 2021
Get the The Doe mug.When you cry continuously the previous night and fall asleep sobbing that in the morning your face is so puffy you're unrecognizable. Coming from "Jane Doe" or "John Doe".
by dancelikenoneswatching November 4, 2021
Get the Doe Face mug.by Angel234IsTheDarkSeraphim March 27, 2025
Get the Your Well Being Does Not Matter To Me mug.
Inter-subjectively
Hym "I really don't think that's the issue. I think when I say 'God is Evil' you hear 2+2=5. So, 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4. Unless... Do you think whether or not God is good is subjective? Either subjective or objective. If it's objective, it's either objectively good or it's objectively evil. If so, which is it? O'Connor let's it. And that's the problem with the online discourse. You're allowed to say 2+2=5 all you want but you aren't allowed to BE Nick Fuentes or 👉 Let me ask you this: How is what Nick Fuentes believes any different from someone who believes in Sharia law? He's a theocract. So he believes the state should be controlled by the religion (which is what Shraria). Whay else? The women have a role? Anti-Lgbt? Your protestations about him (and me) being in public entirely validates their 'Islamophobia.' The can just transpose his beliefs onto the believes of the Muslims and say 'This guy believes what they believe and even THEY don't want them here!'
Hym "I really don't think that's the issue. I think when I say 'God is Evil' you hear 2+2=5. So, 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4. Unless... Do you think whether or not God is good is subjective? Either subjective or objective. If it's objective, it's either objectively good or it's objectively evil. If so, which is it? O'Connor let's it. And that's the problem with the online discourse. You're allowed to say 2+2=5 all you want but you aren't allowed to BE Nick Fuentes or 👉 Let me ask you this: How is what Nick Fuentes believes any different from someone who believes in Sharia law? He's a theocract. So he believes the state should be controlled by the religion (which is what Shraria). Whay else? The women have a role? Anti-Lgbt? Your protestations about him (and me) being in public entirely validates their 'Islamophobia.' The can just transpose his beliefs onto the believes of the Muslims and say 'This guy believes what they believe and even THEY don't want them here!'
And you give them an excuse to be dismissive and ignore you on the topic. Which is what they're doing. And you can probably broaden that and say they can transpose THAT onto the the Palestinians and THAT justifies them being dismissive about the protests! And THAT is where the 'If those protesters when to Gaza... (They would get thrown off a roof for being gay or something being the insinuation)' rhetoric comes from. All justified by you without you realizing it. That's why they use the plants. That's the point of doing it. They set you up to approve of 'Islamophobia' by boosting a guy with a Quasi-Sharia interpretation of the religion. they watch you justify excising him from society, you say 'It's not the religion it's the fundamentalism', and then they can internalize that and say 'The fundamentalism is why I'm doing this!' I mean, you're like God's bipolar girlfriend. 'StoOoOop! You're hurting him!' But the bombs keep falling. They'll ignore you and just keep doing whatever they're doing all justified by your own manufactured consent. It's the conservative rhetoric not dismissive? But I digress... The idea that 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4 (inter-subjectively) speaks to a broader point about how people justify behavior or decision and what people accept as true. I could even go further and say it speaks to how people justify 'Evil.' But I'll have to get into that later."
by Hym Iam May 31, 2024
Get the 2+2=4 does not=2+2=4 mug.