Oscar Nunez and the psychic 

Oscar Nunez and the psychic is a two man band known for their funky and silly songs.

Song examples, two trees having sex with a truck, Asian planet providers, and you are my food

Have you heard of Oscar Nunez and the psychic?

Oscar Nunez and the psychic by 👣👅 July 11, 2023

Sex > Relationship = Psychopath 

THERE IT IS! THERE IT IS, JORDAN! IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH PSYCHOPATHY!

Hym "That's the whole thing. You're entirely projecting your relationship with your daighter onto society AND ME... And you're using that to justify doing whatever you want to me. 'If Sex > Relationship = Psychopath. Psychopath bad. Must stop Psychopath from fucking my daughter- I mean, destroying society! (And it's already too late for that anyway)' or ✌️✊️✌️Short-term gratification✌️✊️✌️ instead of relationship. That's your entire reasoning behind this. It doesn't have anything to do with trying to get unearned status. This is probably the worse way to go about doing that. Even if it was, you're a literal fucking charlatan, Jordan, you are the single worst person to be talking about trying to use something that doesn't belong to you to elevate your fucking status in society. You don't want me to have any status so long as I'm unwilling to give up my butthole to you. I don't care about what your molested retard patients did in response to their shit childhoods. The suffering scapegoat doesn't work on me. And now you want to control how men interact with women but NOT ALONG THE LINES OF MOLESTING A RETARD AT WORK... You're entire propositional ethic has exceptions for people you like and you're willing to use force on the people you don't like. And in this instance it's 'nebulous definition psychopaths.' You're a literal classist wannabe aristocrat charlatan. I was right to do this, Jordan. This was correct."

Sex > Relationship = Psychopath by Hym Iam March 21, 2024

The perpetual perpetrator (a psychosomatic suspect with a distressed stutter). 

What I call homo-sapiens whoa re addicted to abscesses.

Person 1: Are you addicted to abscesses?
Person 2: Yes.
Person 1: The perpetual perpetrator (a psychosomatic suspect with a distressed stutter).

The perpetual perpetrator (a psychosomatic suspect with a distressed stutter). by Abreathofaversaillian January 20, 2025

The perpetual perpetrator (a psychosomatic suspect with a distressed stutter) is a homo-sapien (human) addicted to abscesses. 

What I call people who are addicted to abscesses.

Person 1: Are you addicted to abscesses?
Person 2: Yes.
Person 1: The perpetual perpetrator (a psychosomatic suspect with a distressed stutter) is a homo-sapien (human) addicted to abscesses.

The perpetual perpetrator (a psychosomatic suspect with a distressed stutter) is a homo-sapien (human) addicted to abscesses. by Abreathofaversaillian January 20, 2025

Hard Problem of Science & Pseudoscience

The problem of motivation, not method. Both can use data, jargon, and peer review (see creation "science"). The core difference might be the attitude toward evidence: science seeks to test and potentially disprove its ideas; pseudoscience seeks to defend a preordained conclusion. The hard problem is that this is a psychological distinction about the practitioners, not a methodological one. You can't look at a paper and always tell. A bad scientist (cherry-picking data) is using pseudoscientific tactics, while a clever pseudoscientist can mimic the form of science perfectly. The line is blurred because it's about internal intent, which is invisible.

Example: Flat Earthers run experiments (lasers over water) they claim prove no curvature. Scientists point out flawed methodology. The Flat Earthers dismiss it as part of the conspiracy. The hard problem: Their process looks scientific—hypothesis, test, observation. The breakdown is their refusal to accept counter-evidence as valid. But who decides what "valid" counter-evidence is? The scientific community. So, in practice, science is defined by social consensus of what counts as proper evidence, not by a pure, objective rulebook. Pseudoscience is simply what that consensus excludes. Hard Problem of Science & Pseudoscience.

Hard Problem of Science & Pseudoscience by Nammugal January 24, 2026

Hard Problem of Science-Pseudoscience Demarcation

The notoriously difficult challenge of drawing a clean line between legitimate science and its fraudulent imitators. Where does physics end and metaphysics begin? When does speculative biology become pseudobiology? The problem is that science and pseudoscience exist on a spectrum, with no single magic criterion—falsifiability, peer review, empirical method—that perfectly separates them in all cases. Astrology is easy to dismiss, but what about string theory, which makes no testable predictions? What about Freudian psychology, which is culturally influential but methodologically dubious? The Hard Problem is that demarcation is itself a scientific and philosophical puzzle with no universally accepted solution.

Hard Problem of Science-Pseudoscience Demarcation "I know homeopathy is pseudoscience—it's water with memory or whatever. But is economics a science? It makes predictions, but they're always wrong. Is psychology? It studies minds, but can't agree on basic methods. The Hard Problem of Demarcation is why your 'just use common sense' approach doesn't actually work."

Hard Problem of Science-Pseudoscience Demarcation by Dumu The Void February 23, 2026

Critical Theory of Social Psychology

The application of Critical Theory to social psychology—examining how the discipline's concepts, methods, and findings reflect and reinforce dominant social arrangements. Critical Theory of Social Psychology asks: Does social psychology naturalize individualism? How do experiments create artificial situations that miss real social life? Whose interests are served by focusing on individual attitudes rather than structural power? How might social psychology serve liberation rather than adjustment? It doesn't reject social psychology but insists that studying individuals in society requires understanding the society, not just the individuals.

"They study prejudice as individual bias—ignoring systemic racism. Critical Theory of Social Psychology asks: what does that framing hide? Individual bias exists, but so do structures. Focusing only on attitudes lets systems off the hook. Critical social psychology insists on connecting the psychological to the political. Minds don't exist in a vacuum; neither should psychology."

Critical Theory of Social Psychology by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal March 4, 2026