Walmart paradox refers to the futile locking of common household items to reduce theft but then not hiring enough staff to allow people to buy the items stuck in the case incurring loss of sales
Synonyms dilemma, quagmire
Synonyms dilemma, quagmire
by Reefermechanic420 March 02, 2024
kid: WOMEN SUX!!1!11 MEN SUPRMACY!!1
someone: so you prefer men over women?
kid: YEYSYESAFDSLKFDGJ
someone: that's gay
kid: EEEWWW GAY BADDD >:((
someone: huh, that's a sigma paradox..
someone: so you prefer men over women?
kid: YEYSYESAFDSLKFDGJ
someone: that's gay
kid: EEEWWW GAY BADDD >:((
someone: huh, that's a sigma paradox..
by ArtyN November 15, 2023
The Sigma paradox happens with thirds mainly e.g 1/3 = 33.333 repeating 2/3 = 66.666 repeating and 3/3 = 99.999 repeating. 3/3 is q whole number equaling 1 however it can't equal 1 because it is 99.9 repeating get it? It comes ever closer too 100% but will never get there. You can relate, in sure.
by pseudonym1583622891 January 21, 2016
“If an education system’s goal is to educate and prepare its recipients for the real world, then why are the graduates so uneducated, and under prepared?”
-Demitri Sconavar
D
-Demitri Sconavar
D
John: “how do the leaders of our society not understand that what they’re doing is immoral and violates the human rights of a group of individuals?”
Jane: “Demitri Sconavar’s Paradox”
Jane: “Demitri Sconavar’s Paradox”
by Charli3 Black October 01, 2020
When women who want men with no bitches inadvertently gives him bitches, therefore making him no longer a man who has no bitches.
Guy 1: Did you hear about Lisa? She apparently wants to date Nick cause he has no bitches.
Guy 2: Wouldn't that mean Nick would have bitches then?
Guy 1: Yeah, they must not know about the No Bitches Paradox.
Guy 2: Wouldn't that mean Nick would have bitches then?
Guy 1: Yeah, they must not know about the No Bitches Paradox.
by [._.] July 13, 2022
"The scientific observation that until a person can be visually observed to exist, they cannot be proven as a real individual and are assumed to exist within the beholder's imagination.
Which is then cancelled out by the fact that, for the beholder too have an imagination they must exist. But because they haven't been observed by most physical beings they're rendered non-existent"
Which is then cancelled out by the fact that, for the beholder too have an imagination they must exist. But because they haven't been observed by most physical beings they're rendered non-existent"
Person 1: I've never seen you in person before, so you're just apart of my imagination
Person 2: that's kinda backwards logic, wouldn't that mean you don't exist because I haven't seen you?
Person 1: How does that make sense?
Person 2: It's probably The Yasuké Paradox, since you don't exist, I don't exist
Person 2: that's kinda backwards logic, wouldn't that mean you don't exist because I haven't seen you?
Person 1: How does that make sense?
Person 2: It's probably The Yasuké Paradox, since you don't exist, I don't exist
by Black_Seiðr March 15, 2021