by nelsha moha December 03, 2015
Process of feminine reasoning as defined by <Rachel-1979> which provides a generalized form of feminine reasoning which is simultaneously unattainable and incontrovertible through traditional male reasoning.
Rachel: "That went down like a damp squid"
Male: "I think you mean 'That went down like a damp Squib'".
Rachel: "No, it's definitely damp squid"
Male: "No darling, it's damp squib, from the explosive squib which fails when wet".
Rachel: "No, it's a damp squid. Squids live under water so they are quite damp".
Male: "Sweetheart I think you're using Rachel-logic. I think you're having a 'blonde' moment".
Also see: "Women are more intelligent than men": I mean, no wonder they think so if they come up with conclusions like this and believe them!
Male: "I think you mean 'That went down like a damp Squib'".
Rachel: "No, it's definitely damp squid"
Male: "No darling, it's damp squib, from the explosive squib which fails when wet".
Rachel: "No, it's a damp squid. Squids live under water so they are quite damp".
Male: "Sweetheart I think you're using Rachel-logic. I think you're having a 'blonde' moment".
Also see: "Women are more intelligent than men": I mean, no wonder they think so if they come up with conclusions like this and believe them!
by Jonny Random April 24, 2011
A somewhat hyperbolic title or caption often added to posts of debates, lectures or discussions featuring a commentator that the poster endorses. It is most frequently associated with YouTube channels promoting conservative figures such as Ben Shapiro and discussing divisive modern trends or viewpoints. Jokes around it often centre on the clickbait-y nature of the title, as well as whether or not the commentator's points in the video can really be considered to be 'facts'.
by falsetokaiba June 15, 2020
According to South Park, this would be a popular exclamation if eveyone in the world was an Atheist.
An obvious parody on "Jesus H. Christ."
An obvious parody on "Jesus H. Christ."
by Ian the Almighty December 20, 2006
A path of reasoning that usually only makes sense to the person or people using it. Insane troll logic often varries in degree and can range from sligtly different to absolutely preposterous. This is not to say Insane troll logic cannot come to a correct conclusion.
some common characteristics of insane troll logic (leaning towards the ridiculous) include...
-complete disregard for the accepted laws of physics
-Extreme ambiguity
-Excessive use or reliance on fallicious arguments.
- non sequitur
-completely absurd sometimes to the point of being ludicrous
some common characteristics of insane troll logic (leaning towards the ridiculous) include...
-complete disregard for the accepted laws of physics
-Extreme ambiguity
-Excessive use or reliance on fallicious arguments.
- non sequitur
-completely absurd sometimes to the point of being ludicrous
Some Examples of the use of Insane troll logic.
Ex 1)
Bedevere: Tell me. What do you do with witches?
Crowd: Burn! Burn them up! Burn!...
Bedevere:
And what do you burn apart from witches?
Villagers:
More witches!
Wood!
Bedevere:So, why do witches burn?
Villager: because they're made of wood?
Bedevere:
So, how do we tell whether she is made of wood?
Does wood sink in water?
Villager: No. No. No, it floats! It floats!
Bedevere: What also floats in water?
Arthur: A duck!
Bedevere: Exactly. So, logically...
Villager: If... she... weighs... the same as a duck,... she's made of wood.
Bedevere: And therefore?
Villager: A witch!
Ex 2)
"What would be nice? Hotpot? Sukiyaki? Crab is a no-no. I can't take it. Picking the flesh out of the shell drives me nuts. Why can't crabs make their shells edible? How come they didn't do anything about that during the course of evolution, might I ask?" - Haruhi Suzumiya
(Most of us can reason that crabs have shell's lest they be eaten by predators such as Haruhi Suzumiya)
Ex 1)
Bedevere: Tell me. What do you do with witches?
Crowd: Burn! Burn them up! Burn!...
Bedevere:
And what do you burn apart from witches?
Villagers:
More witches!
Wood!
Bedevere:So, why do witches burn?
Villager: because they're made of wood?
Bedevere:
So, how do we tell whether she is made of wood?
Does wood sink in water?
Villager: No. No. No, it floats! It floats!
Bedevere: What also floats in water?
Arthur: A duck!
Bedevere: Exactly. So, logically...
Villager: If... she... weighs... the same as a duck,... she's made of wood.
Bedevere: And therefore?
Villager: A witch!
Ex 2)
"What would be nice? Hotpot? Sukiyaki? Crab is a no-no. I can't take it. Picking the flesh out of the shell drives me nuts. Why can't crabs make their shells edible? How come they didn't do anything about that during the course of evolution, might I ask?" - Haruhi Suzumiya
(Most of us can reason that crabs have shell's lest they be eaten by predators such as Haruhi Suzumiya)
by Hexacyonoferate March 08, 2009
Did you hear what Susie said during the meeting? She thinks taking away the coffee in the break room will increase productivity. That is some La La Logic…
by Deirdre (DeDe) Daniels October 17, 2010
A crazy woman who does things with her nails and recently she did her nails in the shower and she has a drink slave named Ben
Simply nail logical is crazy
by Simply nailogical September 30, 2018