I just learned about a study that showed that toddlers show antagonism towards other toddlers who show anti-social traits are viewed more favorably. And before your a priori presupposition that the antagonist is in the moral right and you say "As they should." That's why I'm famous and an archetypal figure and the greatest writer of all time! Because YOU (Jordan) displayed anti-social personality traits! I've listed them several times. That's how I've curried their favor. That's all it takes. It doesn't matter if your innocent or guilty no one cares. But wait, (because I'm a genius) there's more! So, let's turn the hands of time forward. As a toddler, anti-social traits might be kicking and biting but AFTER they develop a personality then the traits people are going to be SOCIALLY REWARDED for antagonizing are: Low conscientiousness, low agreeableness, high openness, and maybe low agreeableness. That's why "Bullies feel perfectly justified" in antagonizing their victims. Because they are socially rewarded for it by the people who watch. I've deduced the cause and motivation for bullying. I'm a genius.
Dr JeepJorp "I don't know you! I'm not even asking you questions! I don't care!"
Hym "Exactly! But you HAVE referred to me on several occasions. You read a speech that I wrote and you've clearly instructed your followers to do yhe same. Say... What would they find if the got your phone JeepJorp?"
Dr JeepJorp "I don't know you! I'm not even asking you questions! I don't care!"
Hym "Exactly! But you HAVE referred to me on several occasions. You read a speech that I wrote and you've clearly instructed your followers to do yhe same. Say... What would they find if the got your phone JeepJorp?"
Hym "I mean the differences between us aren't small at all. On morality, at least, we couldn't be more diametrically opposed. Your's is akin to Ayn Rand's criticism of altruism. But I took that a step farther in saying that the idea that 'people have a responsibility to sacrifice for the greater good' isn't something that applies to YOU. It applies to the people to whom you are speaking. You're TEACHING so you don't have to DO. I think Ayn Rands criticism is correct and I think what you do it worse. You're not sacrificing yourself. You're not even willing to risk sacrificing your reputation to associate with certain people. MY morality, on the other hand, is closer to Peter Singer's conceptualization of morally. Meaning 1. If we have the power to stop something bad from happening without losing something of moral significance, then we must do it. 2. Hunger (I would extend this to all forms of privation), disease, and other forms of disability and death (not entirely on board with this one as it's situationally fine i.e. retard molesting whores) are very bad. Ect. (This breakdown of Peter Singer's proposition is from Jeffrey Kaplan's YouTube channel. Go watch the video. I still don't know about the name thing. Some of you clearly don't want to associate with me. Remember that? Remember when I said that? I was right to leave your name out wasn't I? Yeah...)"
by Hym Iam April 26, 2023
Get the Differencesmug. by B.kaiser December 6, 2016
Get the different niggamug. "So now you want to wave the national flag? Didn't you call that 'racist' a few years ago?"
"Completely different scenario! I'm doing this because it's against that evil foreign leader!"
"Completely different scenario! I'm doing this because it's against that evil foreign leader!"
by tourchan February 27, 2025
Get the completely different scenariomug. May 4th is national make a goddamn difference day, because we need to make a goddamn difference if we are adamant about not going extinct as a species in the next 10-20 years.
I’m not going to tell you how to use national make a goddamn difference day in a sentence because it’s self explanatory lol
by PrimePlatypus12 May 4, 2019
Get the national make a goddamn difference daymug. in our modern soc-med oriented world, a very important moral quality that you absolutely cannot, and will never be able to, buy at the local Walmart or dollar store
the main reason the 2016 us presidential campaign rhetoric was so vitriolic and insidious is that both presidential nominees don\t know the difference between attacking people and problems.
by Sexydimma October 25, 2016
Get the difference between attacking people and problemsmug. by c_lato February 8, 2023
Get the same shit different toiletmug. by Wanted091 October 31, 2023
Get the Same shit different pilemug.