As any discussion grows longer, the probability of a brahmin sneeding about BR Ambedkar or Dalits approaches 1.
by cybermarsey February 11, 2023
Jule's law implies the group text with my 4 friends (5 people total) also exists with me removed (4 people total).
by slumberlust June 29, 2021
Jule's law asserts the group text with my 4 friends (5 people total) also exists with me removed (4 people total).
by slumberlust June 29, 2021
"We can shoot a fair one,I'm not affiliated, I don't need to be, Im down by law, homeboy!" Ny/Nj Circa 80s urban slang
by #strictlyoldschool April 02, 2021
"Hey man, wanna hit the club tonight?"
"Sure, is tom coming?"
"yeah why?"
"I've been trying to avoid him, he's my bro in law"
"aw that sucks"
"Sure, is tom coming?"
"yeah why?"
"I've been trying to avoid him, he's my bro in law"
"aw that sucks"
by Lemon Addict July 29, 2017
The application of scrutiny towards any statement which claims to know a general or specific consensus without citing polls or metadata. Identification of an appeal to vapid congruence.
Don’t know the specifics of the case, but the general consensus seems to be that the internet mob overplayed their hand.
Consensus of who? Perhaps it's time for the Law of the Nameless. The thing is, this is playing out in a United States court.
Consensus of who? Perhaps it's time for the Law of the Nameless. The thing is, this is playing out in a United States court.
by ØMVЯ November 11, 2021
An idea similar in concept to Murphy’s Law which states “Anything that can be taken out of context, will be taken out of context”
Guy #1: “I love Dick (1999)”
Guy #2: “lmao you love Dick”
Guy #1: “I do, but I am also now a victim of Done’s Law
Guy #2: “lmao you love Dick”
Guy #1: “I do, but I am also now a victim of Done’s Law
by Soulja Boy MD May 24, 2024