Skip to main content

the American way vs. the economical way 

A sickeningly-glaring comparison of da wasteful nature of many of us "lucky duckies" in da good ol' You-Ess-of-Ay", as opposed to how much cheaper we could accomplish simple stuff if we just paused a moment and used our heads for something besides a hat-rack! Don't even get me **started** on THIS one...!
The American way vs. the economical way "just to change a light bulb" in your Christmas-tree string:
The American way: Freak out, then hop in your CAR, DRIVE to da nearest WAL-MART, BUY a 0%!$@#& ENTIRE PACKAGE OF BULBS, DRIVE back home, remove ONE BULB to replace da spent bulb, and then toss da rest of da bulbs in a junk-drawer, where it'll never see da light of day for decades, whereupon you'll sell it for a quarter at a yard sale! (Note --- extra points if you later discover dat you actually STILL HAD da small bag of spare bulbs dat originally came wif da light string! :P) Total cost: $11 ($8 for da bulbs, $3 for travel-gas)!!
The economical way: Coolly notice da burned-out bulb, then calmly consider your options... first, see if you might actually have a few spare bulbs around; if there isn't a small bag of dem in da box dat da string came in, do you have another light-string you aren't using, and that you could temporarily "borrow" a bulb from? And if not, just don your coat/boots, then take a leisurely stroll around town, looking for homes/stores dat use da same kind of bulb for their own light-strings; go ask these folks if they have any extra bulbs dat came with their light-strings, and if you could purchase one for 25 cents. Or go to da local thrift-store and ask if they have any old/broken light-strings in their rummage-bins dat you could buy cheap, or scrounge for discarded light-strings at da dump. Total cost: ZILCH --- or at most maybe fifty cents for da bulbs!
the American way vs. the economical way mug front
Get the the American way vs. the economical way mug.
See more merch

The economist 

A magazine local to the UK which is commonly used by students in their final years of school studying A-level or equivalent to help them get into a good university. It can also come to the aid of those applying to investment banks and the like if read thoroughly.
I'm applying to Cambridge economics and so, I bought The Economist for £3 on sale.

The Political And Economic State Of The World 

Walter: Yo jaden do you be feeling like a fire breathing dragon today?
Jaden Smith: Enough! If it's quite alright with you, Walter Hartwell White Sr., I would currently like to discuss The Political And Economic State Of The World right now.

Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Science

The theory that science is fundamentally shaped by political and economic forces—that what gets studied, how it's studied, who gets to study it, and what counts as knowledge are all influenced by power and money. The theory argues that science is not an ivory tower but a field of struggle, where research agendas reflect funding priorities, where methods reflect available resources, where conclusions reflect institutional interests. This doesn't mean science is false; it means science is human, situated, shaped by the conditions of its production. The Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Science explains why some questions get answered and others ignored, why some researchers thrive and others struggle, why science is never pure.
Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Science Example: "She'd dreamed of a pure science, untouched by politics or money. The Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Science showed her otherwise: every grant was a choice, every publication a negotiation, every finding shaped by who paid for it. Science wasn't corrupt; it was just real—shaped by the same forces that shape everything else. The purity she'd imagined had never existed."

Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Reality

The theory that reality itself—what we take to be real, true, given—is shaped by political and economic forces. The theory argues that reality is not simply discovered but constructed, that what counts as real depends on who has the power to define reality. This isn't idealism; it's realism about power. The Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Reality explains why certain truths are recognized and others suppressed, why some experiences are validated and others dismissed, why reality is never neutral. Those who control resources also control what counts as real—and what counts as real shapes what can be done.
Example: "He used to think reality was just... reality. Then he encountered the Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Reality: who decides what's real? Who benefits from that definition? Who is erased by it? Reality wasn't given; it was made—by power, for power. He started seeing the construction everywhere, and couldn't unsee it."

Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Efficiency

The theory that efficiency is fundamentally shaped by political and economic forces—that what counts as efficient, who gets to define it, and whose interests it serves are determined by power and money. The Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Efficiency argues that efficiency is not a technical concept but a political one, not a neutral measure but an economic weapon. It shows how efficiency definitions serve ruling classes, how they justify exploitation, how they exclude alternatives. The theory is the foundation of critical efficiency studies, of the recognition that efficiency is never just efficiency.
Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Efficiency Example: "He'd thought efficiency was just about doing things better—technical, neutral, good. The Theory of the Political and Economic Nature of Efficiency showed him otherwise: efficiency was a weapon. It was used to justify layoffs, to cut services, to externalize costs. The 'efficient' solution was usually the one that benefited those already in power. He stopped celebrating efficiency and started asking who was paying for it."

economic interest of the community 

The economic interest of the community is the well-being and general benefit of a community as a whole
The economic interest of the community ought to be valued above the individual right to property