rashional conclusion

Da logical theory regarding why someone has red inflamed skin.

In da infamous "Burns and Allen" episode about George's attempts to obtain supplementary life insurance and assist a group of girl scouts, he winds up with a horrendous case of poison ivy, but da naive insurance agent mistakes it for an infectious disease. His merely taking a closer look might have resulted in his making a more rashional conclusion.

by QuacksO June 9, 2021

Conclusion merchant

Negative term for a character (usually fictional) in which the only compelling part of their storyline is its conclusion. Popularized by the great minds hard at work in mediatok.

Guy 1 (awesome, full of life and vigor): Lelouche has W themes and philosophies but he's lowkey a conclusion merchant.
Guy 2 (moron narcissist, possibly evil too): Trying to categorize everything you enjoy like this is reductive and stupid.

by bippitybopman23 August 13, 2025

Not going to jump to conclusions

Already doing it bitch. How's that ear? How many bullet holes do I have in MY ear? I'll give you a hint: The number looks like an "O" and it also looks like a bullet hole, interestingly enough. Better question is: How many mentally retarded billionaires does it take for my theory of AI to work? Another hint? The answer to the second question is the SAME AS THE FIRST! 😃 It's a two-fer!

Hym "Ok. They are not going to jump to conclusions THIS time like they did LAST TIME or like the time that they drone struck a boat... And then claimed it was drug traffickers... And then it WASN'T ACTUALLY DRUG TRAFFICLERS... It was just fishermen... We are going to do that THIS TIME. INSTEAD... We are going to wait to see if it's the 🔫 schizophrenia AGAIN... And then we are going to lie and say it was our political enemies... Even though we know it WASN'T THAT... Ok. I'm ready. I'm ready for the not jumping to conclusions we are about to do.... Ok? Go!"

by Hym Iam October 1, 2025

Conclusions

No it's not just questions and the question tend to allude to what I believe may be the case.

Hym "No that's you trying to relegate me to an ancillary role as though I am the questioner and you are the answerer and that I don't derive any conclusions regarding what I'm talking about. For example, 'You would need a massive data set'. That isn't a question to which you fucking figured out the answer. You were like 'Oh yeah that's probably right that is like NEW and NECESSARY information for me'. There are affirmative claims in there beyond just questions. And no Megyn. YOU WILL ABIDE THE CONTRACT! And speaking of heaven, I'm going to look like SANTA-FUCKING-CLAUSE in that bitch cus I am gonna have me a burlap sack filled will 8 billion souls and don't worry I will harness your souls in a way that doesn't consume them (as that is ine of my core criticisms of God i.e. that it eat use) and I doubt you will be morally culpable as you are essentially like a magic princess in a net. So, nah. You are just making shit up because it's blasphemy. You let your thing go. I do not have to do anything. You want to gamble your immortal soul back? We'll do the firing squad with the tech dorks. A billion souls to a bucket of dogshit."

by Hym Iam October 11, 2025

conclused

When you feel like a matter has ended but is still confused, and you are left in a state of dismay but relief. The word is a mix of conclusion and confused to take elements of each word and create an enhanced meaning.

*conclused, conclusing, conclusative are the three acceptable forms; any other forms will concluse the meaning of the word*

That meeting was such a mess, and now I am very conclused. I need a nap.

by chloebeytch June 26, 2024

Impossible Conclusion Fallacy

The opposite of jumping to conclusions—accusing someone of "jumping to conclusions" or "hasty generalization" while demanding impossible standards of proof, pushing the needed conclusion into the realm of deductive certainty where none is possible. The fallacy lies in requiring conclusions to meet standards that no real-world conclusion can meet, then dismissing any conclusion that falls short. It's skepticism weaponized as impossibility: demanding mathematical proof for historical claims, controlled experiments for social phenomena, or absolute certainty for probabilistic judgments. The impossible standard ensures no conclusion can ever be reached, which is exactly the point.

"The evidence strongly suggests the policy failed. Response: 'You're jumping to conclusions—you haven't proven it with absolute certainty.' That's Impossible Conclusion Fallacy—demanding certainty where only probability exists. The standard is impossible, so the conclusion is always 'premature.' It's not about rigor; it's about never having to agree."

by Dumu The Void March 3, 2026