Argumentum Ad Objectitatem

A form of Objectivity Bias where one invokes "objectivity" as a magic wand to dismiss opposing views without engaging them. The fallacy lies in claiming that one's own position is simply objective reality while the opponent's is biased, ideological, or subjective—without demonstrating why this is so. "You're not being objective" becomes a conversation-ender, a way of positioning oneself as the neutral arbiter of truth while dismissing all alternatives as merely perspectival. This fallacy allows the speaker to claim the mantle of objectivity without actually doing the work of demonstrating why their view deserves that label.

Example: "He didn't argue against her interpretation—he just said she wasn't being objective, as if his own view was simply reality itself. Argumentum Ad Objectitatem: using the claim of neutrality to justify taking sides."

by Dumu The Void March 16, 2026

Argumentum Ad Veritatem

A form of Truth Bias where one invokes "truth" as a self-justifying warrant for their position, treating their claims as simply what's true and therefore beyond challenge. The fallacy lies in using the concept of truth to immunize one's views from examination—"I'm just telling the truth" becomes a way of saying "I don't need to argue, because what I say is simply reality." This fallacy shuts down inquiry rather than advancing it, positioning the speaker as the conduit of truth and all opponents as either deceived or deceivers. It's argument by assertion of virtue, not by evidence or reason.

Example: "She responded to every question with 'I'm just telling the truth'—as if saying it made it so. Argumentum Ad Veritatem: using the word 'truth' to avoid having to demonstrate it."

by Dumu The Void March 16, 2026

Argumentum Ad Realitatem

A form of Reality Bias where one invokes "reality" as a trump card, treating their position as simply how things are and any alternative as literally out of touch with reality. The fallacy lies in claiming direct access to the real while others are trapped in illusion, ideology, or wishful thinking—without demonstrating why one's own access is privileged. "You're not living in the real world" becomes a way of dismissing views one dislikes without engaging them. This fallacy allows the speaker to position themselves as the realist, the pragmatist, the one who sees things as they really are—while everyone else is merely dreaming.

Example: "He dismissed her policy proposals as 'not living in the real world'—never explaining why his preferred policies were any more realistic. Argumentum Ad Realitatem: using 'reality' as a cudgel rather than a standard."

by Dumu The Void March 16, 2026

Argumentum Ad Comitia

A form of Majoritarian Bias where one invokes majority opinion as proof of correctness, treating popularity as validation. The fallacy lies in assuming that because many people believe something, it must be true—or because most people support something, it must be right. "The majority supports it" becomes an argument-ending move, as if numbers could settle questions of truth or justice. This fallacy ignores that majorities have been wrong throughout history, that truth is not decided by vote, and that justice often requires opposing majority opinion. It's argument by crowd, not by reason.

Example: "When asked about the policy's ethical problems, he simply said 'most people voted for it.' Argumentum Ad Comitia: treating election results as moral justification."

by Dumu The Void March 16, 2026

Argumentum ad twoja stara

"Argument" używany kiedy osobnikowi zabraknie jakiś logicznych lub sensownych argumentów, który głównie zahacza o członka twojej rodziny.

Osobnik 1 - "Uważam, że Dark Souls II jest zajebistą grą!"
Osobnik 2 - "A ja uważam że zajebiście to twoja stara ciągnie mi lachę"
Osobnik 1 - "Argumentum ad twoja stara"

by Jakiś Typ March 6, 2025

Argumenting

when a retard who came straight out a EAL and just came up with the word argumenting

we are argumenting

by Dicflipper May 6, 2025

Arhum Bin Maaz

**Arhum Bin Maaz (n.)**
*ar·hum bin maaz*

A fictitious yet remarkably convincing individual often referenced in online discourse as a polymathic enigma. Allegedly born in 1998 in an undisclosed location "between two time zones," Arhum Bin Maaz is said to have achieved early acclaim for inventing a theoretical framework known as *Quantum Imagination*, which combines speculative physics with abstract poetry to explain déjà vu.

Commonly described as having “the handwriting of a philosopher and the typing speed of a hacker,” Arhum is credited with several apocryphal achievements, including advising a secret United Nations subcommittee on existential risk, decoding a forgotten language based on bird calls, and disappearing from social media every full moon.

Despite a complete lack of verifiable records, sightings, or publications, references to Arhum Bin Maaz persist in niche forums, cryptic blog posts, and a singular podcast episode that was mysteriously removed hours after airing.

**Usage:**
*"Honestly, this Nigga is so hard, we might need to pull an Arhum Bin Maaz to thug it out."*

by jimmobobfreyo31 August 20, 2025