When someone who:
• Makes Fake Facts • Makes Stupid Assumptions • Say Online Friends Are Better Then Real Ones • Says Cheating On My Patner Is Okay
• Makes Fake Facts • Makes Stupid Assumptions • Say Online Friends Are Better Then Real Ones • Says Cheating On My Patner Is Okay
by ✪Virtual Phantom✪ May 09, 2015
When someone uses reasoning that makes almost no sense, yet somehow seems to win arguments in a negative*negative = positive fashion.
Dude A: B is the imposter
Dude B: How is that possible
Dude A: You were in electrical and you vented there
(B was the imposter)
Dude B: Man I was in navigation and nowhere near electrical. A used some Arnav Logic right there.
Dude B: How is that possible
Dude A: You were in electrical and you vented there
(B was the imposter)
Dude B: Man I was in navigation and nowhere near electrical. A used some Arnav Logic right there.
by newbugs September 30, 2020
3 Drac bow archers with cov vs lvl 72 hawkeye, bd, sws.
3 drac bow archers: are you serious? wow bad 3v9
72 hawkeye: 3v9? just me boxing 3 people is not 9 even if they were all live! Nice peka logic!
3 drac bow archers: are you serious? wow bad 3v9
72 hawkeye: 3v9? just me boxing 3 people is not 9 even if they were all live! Nice peka logic!
by Stygian November 17, 2006
“WHY would you get married KNOWING that you’re STILL going to cheat on her?? Because you think that you can STILL get away with it?
That’s BACKWARDS LOGIC!!!
That’s BACKWARDS LOGIC!!!
by theultimatelibra February 06, 2020
Running two arguments side by side under different and contradictory rule sets. Especially, creating an analogy and denying that others make conclusions between them.
P1: I go through harassment from the leaders of this organization just as the Jews went through harassment from Nazi officers.
P2: You haven't as much as been placed under surveillance, let alone that kind of duress.
P1: I'm not comparing the two! I'm using parallel logic.
P2: You haven't as much as been placed under surveillance, let alone that kind of duress.
P1: I'm not comparing the two! I'm using parallel logic.
by Poor Lurker October 29, 2012
circular logic:
Atheist: How do you know God exists?
Believer: The Bible says so.
Atheist: How do you know the Bible is the absolute truth?
Believer: Because it came from God.
Atheist: How do you know God exists?
...
Atheist: How do you know God exists?
Believer: The Bible says so.
Atheist: How do you know the Bible is the absolute truth?
Believer: Because it came from God.
Atheist: How do you know God exists?
...
by ParagonofParagons December 13, 2007
An appeal to emotion or some kind of irrational argument by a woman. Usually made to somebody she is involved in a relationship with.
Also used to incorrectly describe proper arguments made by women when her partner is later retelling an argument to his friends.
Also used to incorrectly describe proper arguments made by women when her partner is later retelling an argument to his friends.
Dude, she used girl logic on me, there was no way I could have won the argument no matter what I said.
by ComradePinko April 19, 2007