Skip to main content

The 4 big d's 

The 4 big d's stand for David dementia dick disorder This disorder gives you the ability to pull no bitches and have dementia This also comes with the middle age dad starter pack
David has the 4 d's

The 4 big d's stand for David dementia dick disorder This disorder gives you the ability to pull no bitches and have dementia This also comes with the middle age dad starter pack
The 4 big d's by Meatrider69 April 20, 2023
The 4 big d's mug front
Get the The 4 big d's mug.
See more merch

The 1-4 Scale 

A simple scale to measure your attraction to a woman.
1. I wouldn't and I don't see why anyone would

2. I wouldn't buy I can see why someone would

3. I would but I can see why someone wouldn't

4. I would and I can't see why anyone wouldn't
"Damn dude she's bad AF, what would you rate her on the 1-4 scale"
"Yea she's cute, I'd only give her a 3 tho"
The 1-4 Scale by Howie440 August 1, 2020

The 1 - 4 scale 

The 1 - 4 scale was devised by several brilliant minds who grew increasingly frustrated with the inherent subjectivity of rating women on a 1-10 scale of fuckability. Hence, the 1 - 4 scale was created to avoid the dubious, yet frequent dilemma of distinguishing between a "9" an 8.4" a "3.4" etc. The genius of the 1 -4 scale is that it employs a categorical, objective system generally agreed upon by most heterosexual males (and lipstick lesbians, not the butch ones).
Without further ado, here is the breakdown of categories:

A "1": This category is designated for females who you un-mistakenably, undoubtedly, and unabashedly would not have sex with, even in your most inebriated, depressed and lonely state. The "1" is generally characterized by the lethal combination of an ugly face, extreme obesity and very low self-confidence.

The "2":
This category is interesting because a lot more variables come into play here. The "2" is agreed upon to be generally unattractive however due to a variety of circumstances (i.e. shes a butter face, decent face with a fat body, or you have a fetish for 14 year old Malaysian prostitutes), you will have sex with her if you are drunk enough. The key here is that nobody finds out. You make sure you keep this one to yourself.

The "3":
Simultaneously the easiest, yet most problematic category to define. The "3", very broadly put, is a legitimately attractive female who you would unashamedly have sex with. The "3" is worthy of bragging rights, perhaps even girlfriend material, if you're a pussy like that. This is probably the best you're going to ever do.

the "4":
The "4" is distinct and should not be thrown around lightly. To put it in the words of one of the founding fathers of the 1-4 scale, "this girl is so hot, you would kill your own mother and piss on her grave just to smell this girl's shit." While killing is a little extreme (given the nature of our court system and their increasing willingness to play the "hard line" on parent killings), it puts into context the magnitude of what the "4" represents. This girl is so out of your league, you avoid eye contact at all costs. "4's" represent under 1% of the female population, and you most likely will never insert your penis in one.
Me: "Hey dude, how did last night go?"
Roommate: "Not bad, brought a girl home"
Me: "Nice. She a 3?"
Roommate: "No, i'd say like a 7/10"
Me: "Listen cock-smoker, the 1-10 scale is for fucking amateurs, what is she on the 1 - 4 scale we discussed?"
Roommate: "Oh..I'd say mid-to-high 2ish"
Me: "werd"
The 1 - 4 scale by porneggs March 1, 2009

4 the streets 

Someone who keeps on banging niggas 1 after another but denies it
Damn she just f*cked tyrone and now she f*cking you??...She 4 the streets
4 the streets by Jerri12 September 14, 2023

The World Over Heaven Requiem Act 4 Sus Edition 

What in the hell is this, a stand??????????? Wait why did you even want to type this thing in? Idk im just the one who is making this page, have fun nerds.
Random person: Hey dude do you like JoJo????

Other random person: Yea! have you heard of a stand called, The World Over Heaven Requiem Act 4 Sus Edition?

The 4 Axes of the Science Spectrum

An expanded model adding two crucial dimensions to the basic framework. Axis 1: Pure-Applied (knowledge for understanding vs. knowledge for use). Axis 2: Hard-Soft (precise measurement vs. complex interpretation). Axis 3: Consensus-Stable vs. Consensus-Emerging (fields with established paradigms vs. fields still in formation). Axis 4: Value-Laden vs. Value-Neutral (sciences that explicitly engage values vs. those that aim for value-freedom). These four axes create a sixteen-type space that captures far more nuance than simple binaries. Physics sits at hard, pure, stable, relatively neutral. Medicine sits at applied, mixed hardness, stable, deeply value-laden. Sociology sits at soft, mixed pure-applied, emerging, deeply value-laden. The 4 Axes reveal that methodological debates often stem from different positions on these spectra.
The 4 Axes of the Science Spectrum "Your critique of social science assumes it should be on the same axes as physics. The 4 Axes show: different coordinates entirely. Social science is softer, more applied, less paradigmatically stable, more value-laden. That's not failure—it's a different location on the spectrum. Map before you judge."

The 4 Axes of the Technology Spectrum

An expanded model adding two crucial dimensions to the basic framework. Axis 1: Hard-Soft (physical vs. informational). Axis 2: Consumer-Industrial (individual vs. systemic use). Axis 3: Enabling-Replacing (augments human capacity vs. replaces human function). Axis 4: Transparent-Opaque (understandable operation vs. black-box complexity). These four axes create sixteen technology-types. A hand tool is hard, consumer, enabling, transparent. AI is soft, industrial (mostly), replacing, opaque. Social media is soft, consumer, replacing (of attention), opaque. Medical devices vary across all axes. The 4 Axes reveal that debates about technology—is it good? is it safe? is it controllable?—depend heavily on where a technology sits on these spectra.
The 4 Axes of the Technology Spectrum "You're worried about AI replacing jobs, but you're fine with calculators. The 4 Axes show why: calculators are enabling (they help you calculate), transparent (you understand how they work). AI is replacing (it does the thinking) and opaque (you don't know why it decides). Same axis, different positions—huge difference in effect."