Skip to main content
Put basically, it's 2011. We are not even a week into the new year (unless this gets publised and your reading it at a future time) and it's turning out that nobody really cares that it's a new year. Politicaly, everyone is still bitching about problems from 2010, like Obamacare, the Republicans taking controle of the House of Representatives, Obama imagineering money into this country (which is going to fuck us all over), the whole illegal immagration, and of course Wikileaks and the WTF a.k.a the Wikileaks Task Force.
The term 2010 Part 2 the Re-Sh*t Stormening was first use by John Stewert on the Daily Show as he explained all of the crap I wrote above.
by Xero _ Manifest January 6, 2011
Flag
mugGet the 2010 Part 2 the Re-Sh*t Stormening mug.

2 shits in the night

Share definition
When two people can't get a hold of each other
I can't get a hold of Raoul. Its been like 2 shits in the night.
by jman1212 December 20, 2018
Flag
mugGet the 2 shits in the night mug.

2 sus 4 the bus

Share definition
When someone or something is too suspicious to be trusted on a bus. Avoid 2 sus 4 the busses to board busses at all costs!
Carter: "hey why cant i come on the bus?" Bjorn: "BECAUSE YOU ARE 2 SUS 4 THE BUS!"
by fboybj November 25, 2021
Flag
mugGet the 2 sus 4 the bus mug.
A foundational model for understanding scientific practice along two fundamental dimensions. The first axis runs from Pure Science (knowledge for its own sake, curiosity-driven research, fundamental understanding) to Applied Science (knowledge for practical use, problem-solving, technology development). The second axis runs from Hard Sciences (physics, chemistry, with precise measurement and controlled experiments) to Soft Sciences (sociology, psychology, with complex systems and interpretive challenges). These two axes create four quadrants: hard-pure (theoretical physics), hard-applied (engineering), soft-pure (theoretical sociology), soft-applied (clinical psychology). The model reveals that "science" isn't one thing—it's a spectrum of practices with different goals, methods, and standards.
"You keep judging sociology by physics standards. The 2 Axes of the Science Spectrum show why that fails: they're in different quadrants. Hard-pure has different goals than soft-applied. Different axes, different standards. Learn the spectrum or stay confused about why psychology doesn't look like chemistry."
by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026
Flag
mugGet the The 2 Axes of the Science Spectrum mug.
A foundational model for understanding technology along two fundamental dimensions. The first axis runs from Hard Technology (physical tools, machines, infrastructure—things you can touch) to Soft Technology (processes, algorithms, software, social techniques—things you can't touch but shape behavior). The second axis runs from Consumer Technology (designed for individual use, entertainment, convenience) to Industrial Technology (designed for production, infrastructure, large-scale systems). These two axes create four quadrants: hard-consumer (smartphones), hard-industrial (factory robots), soft-consumer (social media apps), soft-industrial (supply chain algorithms). The model reveals that "technology" isn't one thing—it's a spectrum of tools with different forms, functions, and relationships to human life.
The 2 Axes of the Technology Spectrum "You keep treating TikTok like it's just a tool, like a hammer. The 2 Axes of the Technology Spectrum show why that fails: TikTok is soft-consumer technology—it shapes behavior, doesn't build things, works on minds not matter. Hammers are hard-consumer. Different axes, different effects. Stop treating software like hardware."
by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026
Flag
mugGet the The 2 Axes of the Technology Spectrum mug.
A foundational model for understanding progress along two fundamental dimensions. The first axis runs from Material Progress (advances in technology, standard of living, physical well-being—things you can measure in GDP, calories, square footage) to Moral Progress (advances in ethics, human rights, justice, dignity—things you can't measure but know when you see them). The second axis runs from Individual Progress (personal development, capability, freedom) to Collective Progress (societal advancement, institutional improvement, shared flourishing). These two axes create four quadrants: material-individual (personal wealth), material-collective (public infrastructure), moral-individual (personal virtue development), moral-collective (civil rights advancements). The model reveals that "progress" isn't one thing—it's a spectrum of improvements that don't always move together.
The 2 Axes of the Progress Spectrum "We have more stuff than ever, but are we better people? The 2 Axes of the Progress Spectrum show the tension: material progress is up, moral progress is... debatable. You can't just say 'things are getting better' without specifying which axis. Progress on one doesn't guarantee progress on the other."
by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026
Flag
mugGet the The 2 Axes of the Progress Spectrum mug.
A foundational model for understanding theories of knowledge along two fundamental dimensions. The first axis runs from Rationalism (knowledge through reason, logic, innate ideas—thinking your way to truth) to Empiricism (knowledge through experience, observation, sensory data—seeing your way to truth). The second axis runs from Foundationalism (knowledge built on secure, certain foundations that cannot be doubted) to Coherentism (knowledge as a web of mutually supporting beliefs, with no absolute foundations). These two axes create four epistemological orientations: rationalist-foundationalist (Descartes), empiricist-foundationalist (early logical positivists), rationalist-coherentist (some rationalists who gave up on foundations), empiricist-coherentist (Quine, much of contemporary science). The model reveals that "epistemology" isn't one debate—it's a spectrum of positions on where knowledge comes from and how it's structured.
The 2 Axes of the Epistemology Spectrum "You keep demanding absolute foundations for knowledge. The 2 Axes of the Epistemology Spectrum show you're a foundationalist. But coherentists say: foundations aren't necessary—what matters is how beliefs hang together. You're not more rigorous—you're just on a different axis. Learn the spectrum or stay confused about why everyone won't play your foundation game."
by Dumu The Void February 25, 2026
Flag
mugGet the The 2 Axes of the Epistemology Spectrum mug.