Objective Truth Biases

The collection of biases that cluster around the concept of "objective truth"—the tendency to treat one's own perspective as uniquely objective, to assume that objectivity requires the absence of perspective rather than the rigorous examination of it, to mistake culturally-shaped standards for universal ones, and to use "objectivity" as a weapon against views one dislikes while exempting one's own. These biases include: treating quantification as inherently more objective than qualitative description; assuming that numbers don't lie (while ignoring how they're collected, interpreted, and presented); believing that one's own cultural position is the "view from nowhere"; and using "objective truth" to dismiss the legitimacy of other ways of knowing.

Example: "His Objective Truth Biases meant he thought his perspective was simply 'reality' while everyone else had 'opinions'—he didn't see his own cultural assumptions as assumptions at all."

by Dumu The Void March 13, 2026

Evidence-Based Biases

The collection of biases that arise from the misapplication of "evidence-based" thinking—treating evidence as a magic word rather than a practice, demanding evidence asymmetrically, mistaking certain kinds of evidence (usually quantitative) as inherently superior, ignoring the values and assumptions embedded in what counts as "evidence," and using "evidence-based" to dismiss any claim that doesn't fit narrow evidentiary standards. These biases don't reject evidence—they fetishize it, turning a valuable tool into a weapon of dismissal and a shield against genuine engagement with complexity, uncertainty, and other ways of knowing.

Example: "His Evidence-Based Biases meant he demanded randomized controlled trials for community wisdom that had worked for centuries—not because he valued evidence, but because he valued only his kind of evidence."

by Dumu The Void March 13, 2026

The antifurry fandom genesis [NON-BIASED, ok?]

The earliest recorded antifurry is hopingbutton , channel first creation is 2011 in his description . He owns the largest antifurry server IN THE WORLD and incredibly popular , even big antifurry youtubers like haloguy7 and other indie ones there are more incredibly small always uploading AF channels than the number of furry subscribers and youtubers they are is which is funny all link him in descriptions hopingbutton isnt even too popular with new AF's .He started doing videos about yiff and other terrible shit, getting himself a reputation and igniting a small community that made a huge meme called Furries VS gamers in 2019/2017 i think.

Furries are much older of a concept than antifurries and recently the community has been struggling to even get people as furries still expand with the BURST of former antifurries after the meme .

cant say why this beef happen's bc i wanna be unbiased

random fucker: hey did you see The antifurry fandom genesis NON-BIASED, ok? definition or something?
random mewing guy: you TOTALLY didnt say that to try to get this definiton approved by urban moderators bc you have to include the word in the sentence

furry: hi guys

fucker 8: hell nah bro you kinda weirld blud

by dankest meme guy but honest January 31, 2024

Law of Absolute and Relative Biases

The principle that bias operates in two modes: absolute bias (distortions that are always and everywhere problematic) and relative bias (perspectives that are problematic in some contexts but valuable in others). The law acknowledges that some biases are universally harmful—racism, sexism, any distortion that systematically harms based on irrelevant characteristics. Other biases are context-dependent—a researcher's commitment to a theory can bias their interpretation (bad) or drive productive inquiry (good). The law of absolute and relative biases reconciles the need to reduce harmful bias with the recognition that complete bias-freedom is impossible and that some "biases" are just perspectives.

Law of Absolute and Relative Biases Example: "He accused her of bias because she approached the topic from her cultural background. She invoked the law of absolute and relative biases: some biases are universally harmful (she wasn't expressing those), others are just perspective (her cultural lens was inevitable, not malicious). The question wasn't whether she had bias—everyone does—but whether her bias was distorting or merely situating."

by Abzugal February 16, 2026

Theory of Recursivity and Generativity of Biases and Similar Issues

The idea that biases, logical fallacies, and similar cognitive and rhetorical distortions can be generated recursively and generatively from virtually any starting point. Because humans are pattern‑seeking, self‑justifying, and social, we can construct accusations of bias against any claim, and those accusations themselves can be accused of bias, ad infinitum. The theory explains why online debates often spiral into endless meta‑discussion about who is committing which fallacy, and why attempts to purge “bias” from discourse tend to produce new biases rather than eliminate them.

Theory of Recursivity and Generativity of Biases and Similar Issues Example: “He accused her of confirmation bias; she accused him of fallacy fallacy; he accused her of bias imputation. Theory of recursivity and generativity: once you start calling out bias, you can generate infinite layers.”

by Dumu The Void April 1, 2026