Medical Slurs

Derogatory terms or labels, often disguised as clinical language, used to discredit, demean, or pathologize a person's lived experience, identity, or health complaints. These are not formal diagnoses but weaponized pseudo-clinical terms deployed to dismiss patients (especially from marginalized groups) by implying their problems are "all in their head," a sign of weakness, or a character flaw. They shortcut medical investigation by blaming the patient.

Example: A woman with debilitating, unexplained chronic pain is told she's just "hysterical" (a term with a deeply sexist history pathologizing the uterus). A patient with complex symptoms is labeled a "frequent flyer" or "hypochondriac" by staff, ensuring their future concerns are met with eye-rolls, not exams. The slur "crocks" (for patients with "crock" of complaints) is used in some hospital slang. These terms serve to gatekeep medical resources and absolve clinicians from diagnostic effort. Medical Slurs.

by Dumuabzu January 25, 2026

Anti-Pseudoscience Slurs

Hyperbolic, derogatory terms used to instantly dismiss and ridicule individuals or ideas that deviate from mainstream scientific consensus, often without engaging their specific claims. While motivated by defense of science, these slurs (e.g., "flatard," "anti-vaxxer" used as a pure epithet, "conspiritard," "woo-woo") function as thought-terminating clichés. They replace reasoned rebuttal with tribal mockery, attacking the person's intelligence or sanity rather than their arguments. This often backfires, reinforcing the target's identity as a persecuted truth-seeker and cementing their in-group loyalty.

Example: In an online debate about GMOs, someone expresses concern about long-term ecological impacts. Instead of addressing the specific concern about monocultures or pesticide resistance, a respondent immediately calls them a "Luddite" and a "science-denier." The slur shuts down conversation. The concerned person, now insulted, retreats to communities that validate their fears, viewing the mainstream as dogmatic and abusive. The slur didn't protect science; it weaponized its label and created an enemy. Anti-Pseudoscience Slurs.

by Dumuabzu January 25, 2026

Cognitive Slurs

Insulting terms that weaponize concepts from cognitive psychology to demean someone's thinking process as inherently defective. These slurs pathologize disagreement by diagnosing the opponent with a cognitive flaw (e.g., "You're just Dunning-Krugerandized," "That's pure cognitive dissonance," "Your confirmation bias is showing"). While these are real biases, using them as casual insults strips them of their scientific meaning and turns them into sophisticated ad hominem attacks. It's a way of saying "You're too stupid to know you're stupid" while pretending to be objective.

Example: In a political debate, Person A presents a statistic. Person B, disagreeing, doesn't engage with the data source but retorts, "You're just experiencing backfire effect; your fragile worldview can't handle facts." This slur allows Person B to claim the high ground of psychological insight while functionally calling Person A an irrational idiot. It psychologizes the disagreement, making productive discourse impossible because any counter-argument can be dismissed as further proof of the alleged bias. Cognitive Slurs.

by Dumuabzu January 25, 2026

Psychological Slurs

Terms that use mental health concepts as generic insults to imply instability, irrationality, or weakness. These slurs (e.g., "You're paranoid," "She's hysterical," "That's psychotic," "Don't be so borderline") take serious clinical conditions and deploy them to dismiss emotional reactions, legitimate concerns, or unconventional beliefs. They are the modern equivalent of calling someone "insane" to win an argument, and they massively contribute to the stigma around mental illness by making diagnoses synonymous with being wrong or unhinged.

Example: A community organizer expresses passionate, urgent concern about a local environmental hazard. A corporate representative, aiming to discredit them, tells the media the organizer is "histrionic" and "prone to panic attacks," subtly framing their advocacy as a symptom of mental instability rather than a reasoned response to threat. The slur pathologizes justified emotion and civic engagement, shifting the discussion from "is there a hazard?" to "is the complainant sound of mind?" Psychological Slurs.

by Dumuabzu January 25, 2026

Aporophobic Slurs

Verbal weapons that stigmatize and dehumanize people living in poverty, reinforcing their perceived worthlessness and otherness. These slurs include classic terms like "bum," "hobo," "welfare queen," "leeches," or "street trash," as well as more modern, bureaucratic euphemisms that serve the same function, like "service-resistant" (implying a homeless person is stubbornly choosing their fate) or "non-compliant." They reduce complex human beings and systemic failures to caricatures of laziness, dependency, and filth, making it psychologically easier to justify withholding help or support.

Example: A local news segment interviews a businessman about a new homeless shelter proposal. He opposes it, saying, "We can't keep catering to these drug-addled vagrants who just want a handout. They'll destroy the neighborhood." The slurs "drug-addled vagrants" and "handout" do not describe individuals; they invoke an aporophobic stereotype that frames poverty as a personal moral failing and charity as enabling bad behavior, thus shutting down any empathetic or systemic discussion of solutions. Aporophobic Slurs.

by Dumuabzu January 25, 2026

Medicine Slurs

A modern, passive-aggressive insult derived from mental health discourse, used to dismiss, invalidate, or pathologize someone's emotions, opinions, or online behavior. The phrase "Take your meds" or its variants ("Did you skip your meds?", "Someone's off their lithium") weaponizes psychiatric treatment as a rhetorical cudgel. It implies the target is inherently irrational, unstable, or delusional, and that their legitimate passion, criticism, or unconventional perspective is merely a symptom of non-compliance with medication. This slur reinforces mental health stigma by framing medication as a tool for social compliance and silencing, rather than a personal medical choice.

Example: In a heated political debate on Twitter, User A presents a well-sourced but emotionally charged critique of a policy. Unable to counter the arguments, User B replies, "Lmao, the conspiracy theories are flying today. Take your meds, schizo." The slur doesn't engage the content; it attempts to medically discredit the speaker, associating their intensity with mental illness and suggesting they'd be silent if properly medicated. It's a way of winning an argument by falsely diagnosing your opponent as crazy. Medicine Slurs.

by Dumuabzu January 25, 2026

Psychosis Slurs

Derogatory terms that use psychotic experiences as metaphors for nonsense, chaos, or unreliability. These slurs (e.g., "That idea is psychotic," "What a schizo take," "He's delusional") casually equate severe mental distress with being wrong, stupid, or untrustworthy. They stigmatize clinical conditions by making them synonyms for intellectual or moral failure. In discourse, they are used to pathologize an opponent's position, shutting down debate by implying their very cognition is diseased and thus their arguments are not just incorrect, but symptomatic.

Example: During a complex debate on economic theory, one participant presents a heterodox model. A critic, instead of engaging the math, tweets: "This schizoid economics is just word salad. The author is clearly off his meds." The slurs "schizoid" and "off his meds" transplant the discussion from the realm of ideas to the realm of pathology. They don't argue; they diagnose, rendering the theory and its proponent inherently illegitimate. Psychosis Slurs.

by Dumuabzu January 25, 2026