Something that doesn't always mean taking away guns.
Gun control can mean a lot of things. It can be as simple as requiring guns that use a high-caliber ammunition to be stored in a locked safe, and it can be as complex as banning all guns. Forms of
gun control also can be achieved without violating the Second Amendment. I do respect the right to keep and bear arms in the U.S, but the 2nd Amendment was written in 1791, where the deadliest guns were muskets, where the reload speed was very long because you had to
ram a bullet and gunpowder down the barrel to load it.
My, how the times have changed.
In 2015, 265 kids who where holding a firearm
shot someone accidentally. 83 people died as a result. A form of
gun control could help fix this. 1.7 million kids live in a house where guns are stored loaded or not locked away. Requiring
gun owners to remove all ammo before storing a
gun, requiring some guns to be stored in a safe, and holding the owner of a
gun responsible if a child is in possession of the
gun(This is pretty much common sense) could reduce the number of accidental shootings in
America.
Guns are also very accessible. You can buy them pretty much anywhere that isn't a convenience store, and for a cheap price. I don'
t see a lot of things wrong with that, but a lot of states require very little training before you're allowed to buy a
gun. Some
gun shows and online sellers don't even require background checks for you to purchase one. Requiring more training on handling and storing a
gun and requiring background checks on every
gun sale can help keep at least some guns out of the hands of potential murderers.
Gun control can be achieved without banning guns.