A framework that seeks to understand and classify the different types of scientific paradigms themselves. It's a paradigm about paradigms. For instance, it might categorize paradigms as reductionist vs. holistic, deterministic vs. probabilistic, or mechanistic vs. vitalistic. It asks: What are the meta-categories that all scientific worldviews fall into? This is a bird's-eye view of the landscape of possible scientific thought.
Scientific Metaparadigm Theory Example: Seeing Darwinian evolution (contingent, historical) and Newtonian physics (deterministic, law-based) as belonging to two different Metaparadigms—one focused on narrative and history, the other on timeless laws—is an act of Scientific Metaparadigm Theory. It helps explain why these fields have such different cultures and standards of proof.
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026
Get the Scientific Metaparadigm Theory mug.The application of paradigm theory to the study of science itself (metascience). It identifies the dominant frameworks that guide how we analyze science—e.g., the Mertonian paradigm (focusing on norms like communism and skepticism), the Kuhnian paradigm (focusing on revolutions), or the Feyerabendian paradigm (epistemological anarchism). Your metascientific paradigm determines whether you see science as a rational, cumulative process or a series of power struggles.
Metascientific Paradigm Theory Example: A historian using Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) to explain why one scientific theory won over another is working within a Metascientific Paradigm that emphasizes social and political factors over pure evidence. They operate with a different set of assumptions than a historian who believes science progresses linearly toward truth.
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026
Get the Metascientific Paradigm Theory mug.The study of the high-level, often unstated models that govern the entire academic enterprise. These paradigms answer: What is the purpose of the university? Is it the German Humboldtian model of pure research and Bildung? The Anglo-American utilitarian model of skill-building and innovation? The critical theory model of social transformation? This theory examines how these competing meta-paradigms shape funding, curriculum, and what counts as valuable knowledge.
Meta-academic Paradigm Theory Example: The current fight over whether universities should be "ivory towers" dedicated to disinterested knowledge or "corporate job trainers" responsive to market demands is a clash of Meta-academic Paradigms. It's a war for the soul of the institution, determining everything from which departments get funded to how professors are evaluated.
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026
Get the Meta-academic Paradigm Theory mug.A framework that examines the different overarching models we have for understanding metacognition—our ability to think about our own thinking. Competing paradigms might view metacognition as: a central executive function in a computer-like brain, an emergent property of distributed neural processes, or a socially constructed skill learned through dialogue. Your metacognitive paradigm dictates how you try to improve thinking, whether through brain training, meditation, or social critique.
Metacognitive Paradigm Theory Example: A self-help guru teaching "mindfulness" operates in a Metacognitive Paradigm that sees thought as a stream to be observed non-judgmentally. A cognitive therapist teaching clients to identify "cognitive distortions" operates in a paradigm that sees thought as a set of propositions to be logically analyzed. They're both doing metacognition, but from fundamentally different theoretical starting points.
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026
Get the Metacognitive Paradigm Theory mug.A theory about the different foundational stances one can take toward logic itself. Key metalogical paradigms include: formalism (logic is a game with symbols), logicism (math is reducible to logic), intuitionism (logic is grounded in mental construction), and pragmatism (logic is a tool for successful action). Choosing a metalogical paradigm determines what you believe logic is about and what it can ultimately tell us about reality.
Metalogical Paradigm Theory Example: A Formalist and an Intuitionist debating the validity of a proof by contradiction are operating from different Metalogical Paradigms. The Formalist says, "The symbols allow it, so it's valid." The Intuitionist says, "You haven't constructed the object, so it's meaningless." They disagree on the nature of truth, not just the proof.
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026
Get the Metalogical Paradigm Theory mug.Similar to Meta-academic Paradigm Theory, but focused specifically on the paradigms that define entire academic disciplines from a higher level. It asks: What are the super-categories that organize knowledge? Is the fundamental divide between the sciences and the humanities? Or between theoretical and applied fields? This theory maps the architecture of the academy itself and how it channels intellectual inquiry.
Academic Metaparadigm Theory Example: The "Two Cultures" divide identified by C.P. Snow—between the scientific and literary intellectual cultures—is a classic Academic Metaparadigm. It explains why a physicist and a poet might have such different values, methods, and notions of truth, and why interdisciplinary work between them is so rare and difficult.
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026
Get the Academic Metaparadigm Theory mug.A high-level theory about the nature of cognitive paradigms themselves. It classifies and analyzes the different possible kinds of models we can have for the mind—are they primarily computational, biological, phenomenological, or social? This meta-theory helps explain why cognitive scientists from different sub-fields often talk past each other; they're not just using different models, they're operating in different meta-frameworks about what a model of the mind should even look like.
Cognitive Metaparadigm Theory Example: The fierce debate between proponents of Classical Computationalism (the mind as a symbol processor) and Embodied Dynamical Systems (the mind as a body interacting with an environment) is a clash not just of paradigms, but of Cognitive Metaparadigms. One sees the mind as essentially like a computer program; the other sees it as essentially like a weather system or a walking gait.
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 4, 2026
Get the Cognitive Metaparadigm Theory mug.