mother: girl or woman who gave birth to a child
father: boy or man who was responsible for the formation of a one child or more children through sperm
parent: mother or father
grandmother: parent’s mother
grandfather: parent’s father
grandparent: parent’s parent
great-grandmother: grandparent’s mother
great-grandfather: grandparent’s father
great-grandparent: grandparent’s parent
great-great-grandmother: great-grandparent’s mother
great-great-grandfather: great-grandparent’s father
great-great-grandparent: great-grandparent’s parent
great-great-great-grandmother: great-great-grandparent’s mother
great-great-great-grandfather: great-great-grandparent’s father
great-great-great-grandparent: great-great-grandparent’s parent
daughter: girl or woman in relation to her parents
son: boy or man in relation to her parents
child: person in relation to her parents
granddaughter: child’s daughter
grandson: child’s son
grandchild: child’s child
great-granddaughter: grandchild’s daughter
great-grandson: grandchild’s son
great-grandchild: grandchild’s child
great-great-granddaughter: great-grandchild’s daughter
great-great-grandson: great-grandchild’s son
great-great-grandchild: great-grandchild’s child
great-great-great-granddaughter: great-great-grandchild’s daughter
great-great-great-grandson: great-great-grandchild’s son
great-great-great-grandchild: great-great-grandchild’s child
father: boy or man who was responsible for the formation of a one child or more children through sperm
parent: mother or father
grandmother: parent’s mother
grandfather: parent’s father
grandparent: parent’s parent
great-grandmother: grandparent’s mother
great-grandfather: grandparent’s father
great-grandparent: grandparent’s parent
great-great-grandmother: great-grandparent’s mother
great-great-grandfather: great-grandparent’s father
great-great-grandparent: great-grandparent’s parent
great-great-great-grandmother: great-great-grandparent’s mother
great-great-great-grandfather: great-great-grandparent’s father
great-great-great-grandparent: great-great-grandparent’s parent
daughter: girl or woman in relation to her parents
son: boy or man in relation to her parents
child: person in relation to her parents
granddaughter: child’s daughter
grandson: child’s son
grandchild: child’s child
great-granddaughter: grandchild’s daughter
great-grandson: grandchild’s son
great-grandchild: grandchild’s child
great-great-granddaughter: great-grandchild’s daughter
great-great-grandson: great-grandchild’s son
great-great-grandchild: great-grandchild’s child
great-great-great-granddaughter: great-great-grandchild’s daughter
great-great-great-grandson: great-great-grandchild’s son
great-great-great-grandchild: great-great-grandchild’s child
by Mr. Jacov November 23, 2019
Get the relatives of consanguinity of straight linemug. Related individuals with some degree of romantic involvement, whether formal or informal like the term "friends with benefits"
Uncle Paul: "Damn, my niece lookin like a snack"
Meemaw Margaret: "Please say that you and Courtney aren't relatives with benefits"
Meemaw Margaret: "Please say that you and Courtney aren't relatives with benefits"
by Medium Salsa May 8, 2017
Get the relatives with benefitsmug. Guy 1: Thought you already had a bae, what'r you doin with this thot?
Guy 2: Open Rels brah.
Guy 1: I'll be hoppin on your gf den~
Guy 2:Good luck. Open rels brah.
Guy 2: Open Rels brah.
Guy 1: I'll be hoppin on your gf den~
Guy 2:Good luck. Open rels brah.
by conanbdetective January 31, 2017
Get the open relsmug. When a person is relatively a 10/10 in relation to their surroundings but would otherwise be much less than a 10.
"Foo, she ugly." "Yeah but imma take her to Vernon and Fuck her there, relative dimes brother." "Oh shit, yeah!"
by Crastor April 25, 2014
Get the relative dimemug. A family member, who’s only benefit in your life is to give you Christmas presents, especially in your youth.
by GuppyKing101 September 10, 2020
Get the Christmas Present Relativemug. Similar to Ken Wilber's "Pre/trans fallacy", which is about conflating pre-rational views with trans-rational views, the Relative/absolute fallacy is about conflating relative perspectives with The Absolute perspective. This is the main source of confusion in the forms of spirituality that deal with the implications of non-duality (Oneness).
There are generally two levels to the fallacy:
1. The first level is the conflation that happens when you don't have knowledge about the distinction between the relative and The Absolute (dual/non-dual). This is common in pre-rational religious people (Wilber). The way that traditional religion interprets various holy texts is itself a good example.
2. The second level happens when you do have knowledge about the distinction between relative and absolute (but it's obviously not complete knowledge). This is common in (aspiring) trans-rational people. A common example is to think that because nothing ultimately really matters, morality doesn't matter, and therefore it's fine to for example hurt other people. This is to conflate "the relative" with "The Absolute". From The Absolute perspective, yes, nothing really matters, but morality can only ever be defined "relative" to a certain value system in the first place. By taking the absolute perspective, you're deliberately stepping outside of all value systems, but "it's fine to hurt other people" would be a moral statement, which means you're actually invoking a relative perspective.
There are generally two levels to the fallacy:
1. The first level is the conflation that happens when you don't have knowledge about the distinction between the relative and The Absolute (dual/non-dual). This is common in pre-rational religious people (Wilber). The way that traditional religion interprets various holy texts is itself a good example.
2. The second level happens when you do have knowledge about the distinction between relative and absolute (but it's obviously not complete knowledge). This is common in (aspiring) trans-rational people. A common example is to think that because nothing ultimately really matters, morality doesn't matter, and therefore it's fine to for example hurt other people. This is to conflate "the relative" with "The Absolute". From The Absolute perspective, yes, nothing really matters, but morality can only ever be defined "relative" to a certain value system in the first place. By taking the absolute perspective, you're deliberately stepping outside of all value systems, but "it's fine to hurt other people" would be a moral statement, which means you're actually invoking a relative perspective.
You're conflating relative perspectives with The Absolute perspective ("The Relative/Absolute Fallacy").
Albert thinks he is God and nobody else is. Albert has committed the Relative/Absolute Fallacy.
Albert thinks he is God and nobody else is. Albert has committed the Relative/Absolute Fallacy.
by Carich99 December 23, 2020
Get the The Relative/absolute fallacymug. 