A select club frequented only by those with the finest of pancaked rear ends. An ass so flat that even a bicycle pump could not bring it back to life.
by LordChewie January 15, 2026
Get the Flat Ass Society mug.Flat-picking refers to a paneling style in which manga panels are arranged in a flat, grid-like or planar structure, emphasizing surface layout over depth, perspective, or dynamic panel breaking. The composition reads as orderly, stable, and spatially “flat,” with panels aligning cleanly and evenly, often reinforcing calm pacing, clarity, or thematic stillness.
Fujimoto uses flat-picking during dialogue scenes to keep the reader grounded.
Flat-picking contrasts with dynamic or fractured panel layouts that suggest motion or chaos.
Flat-picking contrasts with dynamic or fractured panel layouts that suggest motion or chaos.
by Flat picker January 15, 2026
Get the Flat-picking mug.The cheap rhetorical tactic of comparing an opponent's complex, nuanced, or heterodox position—especially one that challenges a scientific or institutional consensus—to the belief that the Earth is flat. This fallacy is a thought-terminating cliché designed to bypass engagement by equating skepticism of a specific scientific model (e.g., string theory, certain climate projections) with a denial of basic, observable reality. It's guilt-by-association with the ultimate symbol of absurdity.
Example: "Questioning the completeness of the Standard Model of particle physics? That's like being a flat earther." This Flat Earth Analogy Fallacy absurdly conflates cutting-edge, theoretical physics with the denial of elementary geometry, aiming to shame and silence legitimate scientific debate.
by Dumu The Void February 4, 2026
Get the Flat Earth Analogy Fallacy mug.Basically when a woman has a chest flatter than any men’s chest so you have to call them a flat fuck because of it.
by dude who likes Kevin Spencer February 12, 2026
Get the Flat fuck mug.The logical fallacy of comparing any position one disagrees with to flat Earth beliefs, implying that because flat Earth is ridiculous, the position in question is equally ridiculous. The fallacy works by guilt by association: if you believe X, you're as crazy as a flat Earther, therefore X is false. It's a rhetorical shortcut that avoids engagement with actual arguments, substituting mockery for reasoning. The flat Earth analogy fallacy is especially common in online debates, where "next you'll tell me the Earth is flat" serves as a conversation-ender, allowing the speaker to dismiss complex positions without addressing them. The fallacy ignores that positions must be evaluated on their merits, not on their resemblance to the most extreme beliefs imaginable.
Flat Earth Analogy Fallacy Example: "She raised concerns about vaccine distribution equity. He responded with the flat Earth analogy fallacy: 'Oh sure, and I suppose the Earth is flat too?' Her concerns about global health inequality had nothing to do with flat Earth beliefs, but the analogy dismissed them without engagement. The conversation ended; the fallacy won."
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 16, 2026
Get the Flat Earth Analogy Fallacy mug.The stronger fallacy of claiming that two positions are equivalent because both challenge some form of consensus, ignoring vast differences in evidence, reasoning, and scientific support. The flat Earth equivalence fallacy asserts that believing in climate change is like believing the Earth is flat because both "go against the mainstream," or that questioning vaccine safety is like questioning gravity because both involve skepticism. The fallacy ignores that skepticism is not a binary; it's a matter of evidence. Some consensus views are supported by overwhelming evidence; others are not. Equating them based on the formal similarity of "questioning consensus" is intellectually lazy and rhetorically manipulative. The equivalence fallacy is beloved of false balance journalism and concern trolling.
Flat Earth Equivalence Fallacy Example: "The pundit committed the flat Earth equivalence fallacy, saying that climate scientists were like flat Earthers because both were 'certain' about their views. The equivalence ignored that one certainty was backed by decades of research and global consensus, the other by YouTube videos and wishful thinking. False equivalence had replaced honest comparison."
by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 16, 2026
Get the Flat Earth Equivalence Fallacy mug.