No Random Crits Syndrome

Something that a random forgettable Tf2 YouTuber coined where weapons in TF2 have no random crits and that’s all it is and it has no use at all.

No Random Crits Syndrome may have something to do with Sado-Masochism

by 1955 Cadillac Coupe Deville December 18, 2022

hyp-hoe-crite

(noun) a hoe that can’t compare because she doesn’t compete

Becky is such a hyp-hoe-crite. She’s mad I wore booty shorts because she has a cottage cheese butt.

by DankestNight January 14, 2023

Ayn Rand's criticism of altruism

As someone who has cited this on so many occasions that it's IN MY PREDICTIVE TEXT... Why do you think it would logically follow that I wouldn't wnat credit or money?

Hym "Seriously! I've cite Ayn Rand's criticism of altruism so many time it's in my predictive text! That's what makes it something-something non-sequitur guys! Try literally anything other than Uno Reverse and Something-Something Non-sequitur ONE TIME! It's a literal coin toss."

by Hym Iam February 22, 2024

Checking for Critters

A whore who is aroused by beastiality has to check her genitalia for critters after sleeping with animals of all varieties.

Anne said her muff smelled like shit after sleeping with the whole forest, so she had to go to the barn and start checking for critters.

by Chimp-Arm April 4, 2024

Schrodinger's critic

Somebody who gives really bad opinions, then decides whether or not to change their opinion to be more agreeable based on the people's reaction around them.

Zack: "Astroworld is Travis Scott's worst album."

Connor: "What the hell? You have to be kidding bro.

Zac: "Okay, fine. It's his second best album."

Connor: "You're such a Schrodinger's critic."

by EnderThatGuy February 5, 2025

Weaponization of Critical Thinking

The practice of using the tools and language of critical thinking—skepticism, questioning, demand for evidence—not to genuinely evaluate claims but to undermine, dismiss, or attack positions one dislikes. The weaponizer of critical thinking doesn't apply the same standards to their own beliefs; they simply wield "critical thinking" as a cudgel against others, demanding impossible levels of proof, rejecting all evidence as insufficient, and declaring themselves the only rational person in the conversation. It's the rhetorical equivalent of a child covering their ears and shouting "I'm being critical!" The weaponization of critical thinking is especially common in online debates, where "just asking questions" becomes a way to spread doubt without making claims, and "being skeptical" becomes a way to dismiss expertise without engaging it.

Weaponization of Critical Thinking Example: "He weaponized critical thinking in every discussion, demanding sources, then rejecting them, asking for evidence, then dismissing it, claiming to be skeptical while believing obvious nonsense. He wasn't thinking critically; he was using the language of critical thinking to avoid ever being wrong. His opponents gave up, exhausted. The weapon had done its job."

by Abzugal Nammugal Enkigal February 16, 2026

Chilling Effect Theory (Critical Thinking)

A framework examining how the concept of “critical thinking” is often weaponized to chill inquiry rather than encourage it. When “critical thinking” becomes synonymous with doubting only certain claims (usually non-mainstream ones), and when it is used to dismiss perspectives without engagement, it produces a chilling effect: people avoid raising questions that will be met with accusations of irrationality. The theory reveals that “critical thinking” can become a boundary marker, not a practice.

Example: “When he raised questions about the standard model in his field, colleagues said he ‘lacked critical thinking’—meaning he wasn’t accepting their consensus. Chilling Effect Theory (Critical Thinking) shows the term can enforce orthodoxy.”

by Abzugal March 27, 2026