by Bryn Benn April 14, 2020

An oxymoron.
It is speaking about the state of bird photographers who will do anything to take a great photo of wildlife. The list of actions include:
1. Feeding of wild birds
2. Stepping on wild birds 'by accident' (OBVIOUSLY they just dont want others to get the same photo opportunity)
3. Recommend culling of bird's native predators
4. Pushing their way around with their massive lens to get a good position and refuse to move even if obstructing the path
5. Witholding information of bird locality, even if information would be vital for ornithologist conducting avian research
6. Breaking local rules and entering restricted areas, endangering lives of those around them
7. Handling of wild animals to prevent them from disturbing their subject
8. Unnecessary destruction of vegetation in wild areas to get clearer view of the bird
It is speaking about the state of bird photographers who will do anything to take a great photo of wildlife. The list of actions include:
1. Feeding of wild birds
2. Stepping on wild birds 'by accident' (OBVIOUSLY they just dont want others to get the same photo opportunity)
3. Recommend culling of bird's native predators
4. Pushing their way around with their massive lens to get a good position and refuse to move even if obstructing the path
5. Witholding information of bird locality, even if information would be vital for ornithologist conducting avian research
6. Breaking local rules and entering restricted areas, endangering lives of those around them
7. Handling of wild animals to prevent them from disturbing their subject
8. Unnecessary destruction of vegetation in wild areas to get clearer view of the bird
by TheJenerate March 3, 2021

I don't know it wouldn't be hard to say that your CONFLATING "criticism" with the thing you're ACTUALLY DOING.
Hym "You're a licensed professional and, therefore, have an ethical obligation to (either) do or not do certain things. You're freedom of speech does not give you the right to use speech as a mechanism to commit and/or participate in crime. This is something that a man who believes that 'the only TRUE consent is marriage' should understand. What you're doing is like feinting interest in your daughter and then banging her out without committing (which is exactly whats I WILL do in the future) OR lying and pretending to be Hym to get women (which probably works because I'm very erotic but STILL TECHNICALLY FRAUD). But where is the trial video. You said you would post a trial video and I have yet to see a trial video. That was a lie. You lied blatantly. You YELLED the lie. You said 'YOU THINK I WON'T POST IT!?' And I said 'Yes. Especially if it names me.' And then that's what happened. The thing I said. What you fail to understand is that MY thing didn't count. Your thing DOES count."
by Hym Iam August 25, 2023

Scalable Ethics is the concept that corporations have a threshold where the forces of maximising profit and growth come into conflict with their ethical or environmental practices, values, and aspirations. It's a term used to interrogate the authenticity of ‘corporate social responsibility’ practices and publicity.
by beeveesqueegee June 28, 2023

The paradigm that the number of senses outside of the world-interior can be counted if reduced to formas prime set-twin-prime set orthogonalities.
Effected by John Locke who concluded that a person's world-interior contained a SINGLE forma.
John Locke proved the existence of democracy analytically.
Effected by John Locke who concluded that a person's world-interior contained a SINGLE forma.
John Locke proved the existence of democracy analytically.
Immanuel Kant proved that human beings judge the world by a paradigm "sense-in-itself." John Locke came along and showed that the world-exterior contains an infinite number of senses-in-itself formas while the world-interior contains one forma. This result is unusual because it was in the 1900's that Alasdair MacIntyre finally separated public communication into the world-interior and the world exterior.
This communicado was ahead of its time as Kant reduced ethics to a counting-problem--not a problem of consideration.
This communicado was ahead of its time as Kant reduced ethics to a counting-problem--not a problem of consideration.
by flightfacilities May 16, 2022

In other words, an "Ethical Gooner". Both meanings are very much the same. Ethical Gooning is someone who goons at a fictional character in any kind of media who is 18 and/or over, and not an underage character.
Ethical Gooner 1: Oh god Rumi "Mirko" Usagiyama is so fucking hot. I wish I could be inside of her... Mmmmmm
Ethical Gooner 2: I need Yor Forger to finger my coochie so bad. Oh fuck yes~ Please yes~
Ethical Gooner 3: Loid Forger's dick would be great in my ass~
Prime Examples of Ethical Gooning
Ethical Gooner 2: I need Yor Forger to finger my coochie so bad. Oh fuck yes~ Please yes~
Ethical Gooner 3: Loid Forger's dick would be great in my ass~
Prime Examples of Ethical Gooning
by Moimoi667 May 18, 2024

A moral debate or consideration to have when picking a topic, fictional character, or person to masturbate or 'goon' to, be it regarding mindset, physical appearance or conditions.
Guy 1: Dude, even if that anime girl is 8000 years old, she looks and acts like a little girl! I'm not gooning to children!
Guy 2: That's ethical gooning right there! You're so real, my man!
Guy 2: That's ethical gooning right there! You're so real, my man!
by uksho February 14, 2025
