Critical Theory of Science

The application of critical theory—with its emphasis on power, emancipation, and social transformation—to the institution of science. Critical Theory of Science examines how science is shaped by power relations, how it can serve domination or liberation, how it might be transformed to better serve human flourishing. It draws on Marx, Foucault, Habermas, and others to analyze science not as a pure pursuit of truth but as a social institution with political effects. Critical Theory of Science asks not just "what do we know?" but "whose knowledge counts?" and "how might science be otherwise?"

Example: "He applied Critical Theory of Science to his own field, asking how research agendas were shaped by funding, how questions were limited by assumptions, whose interests were served. His colleagues thought he was being political; he thought he was being honest."

by Abzugal March 9, 2026

Critical Theory of Sciences

The plural form, recognizing that different sciences require different critical approaches—that a critical theory of physics will differ from a critical theory of biology, which will differ from a critical theory of economics. Critical Theory of Sciences is the project of developing field-specific critiques while maintaining the broader critical commitment to examining power, assumptions, and social relations. It's the recognition that critique must be tailored to context, that one size does not fit all, that each science has its own history, politics, and possibilities.

Example: "The conference brought together critical theorists from every discipline, each presenting field-specific analyses. The common thread was attention to power; the diversity was in how power operated in different contexts. Critical Theory of Sciences was proving to be many things, not one."

by Abzugal March 9, 2026

Critical Epistemology

The branch of epistemology that examines how knowledge is shaped by power, social position, and historical context. Critical Epistemology argues that traditional epistemology's focus on universal, timeless conditions of knowledge misses how knowledge actually works—how it's produced by specific people in specific places, how it serves specific interests, how it excludes specific perspectives. It draws on feminist epistemology, standpoint theory, postcolonial theory, and critical race theory to develop accounts of knowledge that attend to power and position. Critical Epistemology doesn't abandon the quest for knowledge; it insists that the quest be self-aware, that knowers examine their own position, that knowledge be accountable.

Example: "Traditional epistemology asked: what are the universal conditions of knowledge? Critical Epistemology asked: whose knowledge counts, and why? It wasn't abandoning the project; it was expanding it, making epistemology answerable to power as well as to logic."

by Abzugal March 9, 2026

Critical Theory of Epistemology

The application of critical theory to epistemology itself—examining how theories of knowledge are shaped by power, how they serve domination or liberation, how they might be transformed. Critical Theory of Epistemology asks not just "what is knowledge?" but "whose theory of knowledge is this, and what does it do?" It examines how epistemology has been used to exclude (women, people of color, non-Western thinkers) and how it might be reconstructed to be more inclusive, more accountable, more just. It's epistemology at the meta-level: thinking about thinking about knowledge, with attention to power and possibility.

Example: "He applied Critical Theory of Epistemology to the Western philosophical canon, asking how its theories of knowledge had been shaped by colonialism, patriarchy, and class. The canon wasn't just ideas; it was politics. Understanding that was the first step to transforming it."

by Abzugal March 9, 2026

Critical Theory of Science Communication

The application of critical theory to science communication—examining how power, ideology, and social relations shape what science gets communicated, how it's framed, and to what ends. Critical Theory of Science Communication asks: whose interests does science communication serve? What assumptions are built into its forms? How might it be transformed to better serve democratic participation and social justice? It draws on critical theory, science studies, and communication theory to analyze and critique existing practices and to imagine alternatives.

Example: "He applied Critical Theory of Science Communication to the pandemic coverage, asking how communication had been shaped by political pressures, corporate interests, and institutional agendas. The coverage wasn't just information; it was politics. Understanding that was essential for knowing what to trust."

by Abzugal March 9, 2026

Critical Science Communication

An approach to science communication that emphasizes questioning assumptions, examining power relations, and attending to the social and political dimensions of how science is communicated. Critical Science Communication doesn't just transmit scientific findings; it also communicates about the context, limits, and politics of those findings. It asks: who funded this research? What are its limitations? How might it be used? What perspectives are missing? Critical Science Communication is science communication with its eyes open, aware of its own role in shaping public understanding and public policy.

Example: "The journalist practiced Critical Science Communication: she didn't just report findings; she also reported who funded them, what limitations existed, what alternatives were being studied. Her readers were better informed—not just about what was known, but about how it came to be known."

by Abzugal March 9, 2026

Critical Thinking Biases

The meta-collection of cognitive biases that specifically distort, undermine, or corrupt the practice of critical thinking itself. These are not ordinary biases that affect any judgment, but biases that attack the very tools we use to think clearly about bias. They include the bias to consider one's own thinking "critical" while dismissing others' as biased, the bias to apply skeptical standards asymmetrically (strictly to views one dislikes, leniently to views one favors), the bias to treat "critical thinking" as a label one claims rather than a practice one performs, and the bias to mistake cynicism for critique. Critical Thinking Biases are what happens when people weaponize the language of reason against reason itself—using "just asking questions" to spread doubt, demanding "evidence" only from opponents, treating one's own unexamined assumptions as "first principles." They are the pathologies of the proudly rational.

Example: "He thought he was immune to bias because he was a 'critical thinker'—but his Critical Thinking Biases meant he applied skepticism only to views he already distrusted, never to his own."

by Dumu The Void March 13, 2026