The Neutralizer

A very honorary bro that sacrifices themselves to get with a girl in a large group in a group that nobody wants, (usually ugly) so his friends can get it in with her hotter friends. the neutralizer must be under the influence of a mind altering substance so their is minimal recollection of the events . Code of conduct states that nobody speaks of the neutralizer or the act of the neutralizing. it is optional that the neutralizer is paid.

They sent in Ryan the neutralizer to neutralize val in order for nick to get with val's friend.

by Rain125689 May 27, 2013

nad neutralizer

(n). When one takes some sort of physical means to decrease one's libido, so one cannot have an erection. Quite often the man will take something to block one's urges. Another name for this is to install a pop up blocker. Don't confuse this with cock blocker. That's entirely different.

Hey, man, I heard that you're going to Vegas tomorrow. With all those scantily clad showgirls around everywhere, aren't you worried that you will get into trouble with the Missus out of town?

No man, I got it covered. I too a 'nad neutralizer, so I'm good.

by Mind Gamer November 25, 2013

nut neutralization

when the government makes people ejaculate less semen for partners who weren't in American Slavery.

The nut neutralization had the couple seeing a sexologist for help.

by Coop Dupe June 16, 2018

Box of Neutrals.

When your gearbox or transaxle has shat itself, and you can't get a gear.

I mean, I was testing the Gen 3 car, and it shat itself.
Ended up with another box of neutrals.

by Podcast DSO January 20, 2022

Philosophy of Naturalistic Orthodoxy

A branch of philosophy that examines the nature, justification, and implications of naturalistic orthodoxy—asking philosophical questions about the foundations of naturalism itself. The philosophy of naturalistic orthodoxy investigates the epistemological status of naturalist commitments: Can naturalism justify itself without circularity? How do we know that nature is all that exists? What counts as evidence for naturalism, and what would count against it? It also examines the limits of naturalism: Can naturalism account for logic, mathematics, meaning, and value? Does naturalism's own claims presuppose something beyond nature? The philosophy of naturalistic orthodoxy is essential for naturalism to be self-aware rather than merely assumed, for naturalists to understand the philosophical foundations of their worldview rather than treating them as self-evident.

Example: "His philosophy of naturalistic orthodoxy work asked whether naturalism can account for its own most fundamental tool—logic. If logic is just a natural phenomenon, why think it's universally valid? Naturalism's confidence in reason may require something naturalism can't provide."

by Abzugal March 16, 2026

Sociology of Naturalistic Orthodoxy

A branch of sociology that examines how naturalistic orthodoxies are socially constructed, maintained, and challenged within academic and intellectual communities. The sociology of naturalistic orthodoxy investigates how naturalism becomes the default worldview through education and training, how it's maintained through institutional mechanisms (funding priorities, publication standards, professional boundaries), how dissenters (intellectuals who appeal to supernatural or non-natural explanations) are marginalized or excluded, and how the orthodoxy responds to challenges from religious thinkers, postmodernists, and other heretics. It also examines naturalism as a boundary marker—distinguishing "serious" scholarship from "faith-based" thinking, "real" knowledge from "mere belief." The sociology of naturalistic orthodoxy reveals that naturalism's dominance isn't just about evidence; it's also about social power, institutional authority, and the natural human tendency to treat one's own worldview as simply "how things are."

Example: "Her sociology of naturalistic orthodoxy research showed how scholars who questioned naturalism were systematically excluded from prestigious journals and conferences—not because their arguments were weak, but because they violated the orthodoxy that defined 'serious' scholarship. The boundary policing was invisible to those who benefited from it."

by Abzugal March 16, 2026