Skip to main content

Apologetics 

No amout of mental gymnastics is going to affect the binary nature of my proposition. It is EITHER a superordinate preferentially selected for trait in a hierarchy of preferentially selected traits or it isn't. If I'm not citing studies it's because they either don't exist (YET) or I'm unaware of them. Did you look it up or do the study before you tried to rebuke me? No? If I found or did the study would you cede your point or would you make up some sophistry to ignore the results like you're ignoring me. Your position is literally implicit "No True Scottsman Fallacy." "It's not CFCT! He's just just the TRUE Scottsman! That's what women are REALLY attracted to!"
Hym "Your apologetics do not obfuscate the fact that one is stigmatized and the other is not. And YOUR emotional state is 'easily manipulated.' Under the auspices of your liberal psychology WITHHOLDING INFORMATION is emotional abuse. The imposed schizophrenia is GASLIGHTING. The stalking is A CRIME. And is literally the definition of sexual harassment in the workplace but done in a way thay affords them plausible deniability. You don't care how they interacted with me. You just don't like the response. And you don't like that I'm giving people a reason to call into question your decision making. That MAYBE... JUUUST maybe... Your selection criteria is more superficial than you would like to admit. It isn't some sort of social-trigonometry leading you to fuck the guys you're fucking. And I'm not going to engage in the violence argument until you cede that there are some situations that can only be remediated by violence (Abject tyranny, self-defense, punitive, ect). We only care about rules when people we don't like are breaking them. That applies at NON-rules as well. This applies social/behavioral norms. You don't care how people behave until someone you don't like is doing something you don't like. Find a shred of consistency in the enforcement of behavioral norms. I'll wait... I'm sure you associate with people who have violated behavioral standards you believe people should adhere to. But you let it slide, don't you? And that's all this is."
Apologetics by Hym Iam August 23, 2023
Apologetics mug front
Get the Apologetics mug.
See more merch

apologetic pneumonia with a fractured ginglymus while at a dj listening to the beatles 

verbally long word
bro have you heard?
what?
apologetic pneumonia with a fractured ginglymus while at a dj listening to the beatles!!!
what the fuck are you talking about

overly-apologetic 

a person who apologizes too much or a person who apologizes for things that don't need an apology
you need to stop being so overly-apologetic.

All apologies 

A song by Nirvana featured in the two albums “in utero” and “unplugged New York”. The song was written by Kurt cobain as an apology to Courtney Love (his wife) And Frances bean cobain (his daughter). Absolute banger.
Person 1: WHAT ELSE SHOULD I WRITE, I DONT HAVE THE RIGHT 🎵

Person 2: Hey what song are you singing?

Person 1: All apologies by nirvana. Absolute banger.

Testify Apologetics 

One of THE BEST Christian apologetics. Knows how to dismantle any arguement against Christianity and embarrass apologists of oher faiths.
Person 1: "The Bible is corrupted, just look at Jeremiah 8:8! :
Testify Apologetics: You're misquoting the verse. Jeremiah 8:8 is actually talking about God's people rejecting His law like when Jeremiah 6:19 says "Hear , you earth: I am bringing disaster on this people, the fruit of their schemes, because they have not listened to my words and have rejected my law. All over the Bible, God's people consistently affirm the Word, so if it was corrupted, wouldn't God inform his followers about it?

Pretty-Pig-Apologists

Partisans who defend their candidate or elected official with phrases like "the lesser of two evils" and criticizing those who argue for a truly representative government as Puritopians or partisans of an opposition party. Puritopians supersede the term emo-progs for Progressives or left wing Democrats. "Pretty-Pig-Apologists" could also be Republicans who support the Tea Party.

"Pretty-Pig-Apologists" assume a superior attitude and write or voice condescending remarks to those want a better government.

Pretty-Pig-Apologists are partisans not patriots.
The "Pretty-Pig-Apologists" counter any criticism of their candidate or elected official by asserting that a better politician is unelectable.

The apologist can be Republican or Democrat. Democrats use term (formally emo-prog) to describe Progressives just as Republicans could use it for members of the Tea Party.

"While not voting as a Puritopian is like partying while the ship sinks."

"You need to address your Puritopian Plan to bring about progressive change."

"Yes, (Obama) could easily be replaced by _______ _________.
Please fill in the blank, you know, with a more liberal candidate who could realistically be elected this country.
Otherwise, what the respected Member says is just pure demagoguery in lieu of realistic solutions."

I'm not apologizing

You aren't owed an apology breeder and stealing my shit is just going to get me to murder your kids. It isn't in the past.
Hym "I'm not being forced to do anything (yet) and I'm not apologizing. Seriously. Fuck your shitty kids. If you weren't such a piece of shit they would get killed less BUT INSTEAD... You have to lie about mental illness. It isn't a mental illness. What you are doing here called into question the very notion of mental illness. You're making Jordan cry with this shit. And there's the 'yeah, whatever' because that's all you are as a person. That's the entire depth of your being."

A retard "The depth of YOUR being is HATE" 😡

Hym "Totally sane and is a legitimate response to the words I just said. AND it's reflective of the FACT that you're kids should live forever, have a better life than me, and never get molested. CLEARLY!"
I'm not apologizing by Hym Iam March 2, 2025