cigarette soup is the voluntarily unknown consumption of a canned beer or soda that has previously been used as an ashtray or a spittoon for chewing tobacco. This is most likely to occur during keg parties, like minded social gatherings, and occasionally from mischievous pranksters.
While Derek was half dazed from puking in the toilet, he asked Brandon for an opened can of soda to drink. Brandon didn’t realize that he had given Derek a can of cigarette soup, until he yelled, “What the fuck?!”, before vomiting even more than ever.
by yyuryyubicuryy4me June 17, 2018
f.i. or f.o (fit in or fuck off)is an informal reference to a controversial human resources philosophy whereby the employee is expected to conform to the prevailing organizational norms or get fired. It is also used to impose conformity to perceived racial, national, gender or societal norms. it is a "no-holds barred", "frank" and open assessment by a supervisor, who maps the employee's chances and alternate career paths boldly, forthrightly and unhesitatingly. This is said to be "not necessarily" to the employee's advantage. The acronym "f.i. or f.o.”, the neologism, the phrase and meme "fit in or fuck off", and the concept have been expanded and exported to other contexts. For example it is used as a justification for racism, nationalism (e.g., jingoism), ethnic, nativist, immigrant restriction and xenophobic reaction, regulation and action. This idiom is a suggested direction that means to assimilate and be productive.
“Some fast food management teams describe f.i. or f.o., as the culture of a competitive meritocracy.”
by yyuryyubicuryy4me July 17, 2018
The enactment of sabering (removing a cork from a bottle of champagne) using a saber or champagne sword is called sabrage. If the champagne bottle is broken, shatters, or explodes during this process, it can be said that it has run afoul of sabrotage. This is a portmanteau of the words sabotage and sabrage.
So while you sit back and your wondering why,
I got these shards of glass stuck in my eyes, “Surprise!”
Oh my god, it's a bloody mirage,
I'm tellin' y'all, it's sabrotage!
I got these shards of glass stuck in my eyes, “Surprise!”
Oh my god, it's a bloody mirage,
I'm tellin' y'all, it's sabrotage!
by yyuryyubicuryy4me July 21, 2018
When a law enforcement officer is transporting a total A-hole prisoner in the back of his/her patrol car and they hit the brakes suddenly, causing the prisoner to smack his face on the cage/screen.
by yyuryyubicuryy4me December 02, 2018
Ganser syndrome is a rare dissociative disorder characterized by nonsensical or wrong answers to questions and other dissociative symptoms such as fugue, amnesia or conversion disorder, often with visual pseudo-hallucinations and a decreased state of consciousness. The syndrome has also been called nonsense syndrome, balderdash syndrome, syndrome of approximate answers, hysterical pseudodementia or prison psychosis. The term prison psychosis is sometimes used because the syndrome occurs most frequently in prison inmates, where it may be seen as an attempt to gain leniency from prison or court officials. Psychological symptoms generally resemble the patient's sense of mental illness rather than any recognized category. The syndrome may occur in persons with other mental disorders such as schizophrenia, depressive disorders, toxic states, paresis, alcohol use disorders and factitious disorders. Ganser syndrome can sometimes be diagnosed as merely malingering, but it is more often defined as dissociative disorder.
“Ganser syndrome is described as a Dissociative Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) in the DSM-IV, and is not currently listed in the DSM-V. It is a rare and an often overlooked clinical phenomenon. In most cases, it is preceded by extreme stress and followed by amnesia for the period of psychosis. In addition to approximate answers, other symptoms include a clouding of consciousness, somatic conversion disorder symptoms, confusion, stress, loss of personal identity, echolalia, and echopraxia.”
by yyuryyubicuryy4me July 15, 2018
D.A.B.S. is an abbreviated acronym which stands for Drama And Bull Shit. It can cover a wide range of petty and trivial indifferences. Sometimes it can seem to be more on point, if the individuals involved, are immature, obnoxious, boisterous, or impulsive. Set examples can be seen on World Star Hip Hop, or any other social media websites, where troll-like behavior is rampant and unhinged 24/7. D.A.B.S. can also be seen as a reference to child like demeanors, which may include “He said, She said” debacles and heresy.
Brandon: “What’s all the fuss about between Bobby and his Dad?”
Kelly: “Just a bad case of the D.A.B.S. I guess.” Brandon: “That and he’s always wanting to flap his dick suckers, for no apparent reason!”
Kelly: “Just a bad case of the D.A.B.S. I guess.” Brandon: “That and he’s always wanting to flap his dick suckers, for no apparent reason!”
by yyuryyubicuryy4me August 03, 2018
Meta-ethics is the branch of ethics that seeks to understand the nature of ethical properties, statements, attitudes, and judgments. Meta-ethics is one of the three branches of ethics generally studied by philosophers, the others being normative ethics and applied ethics.
There are three kinds of meta-ethics problems, or three general questions:
1) What is the meaning of moral terms or judgments? (moral semantics)
2) What is the nature of moral judgments? (moral ontology)
3) How may moral judgments be supported or defended? (moral epistemology) A question of the first type might be, "What do the words 'good', 'bad', 'right' and 'wrong' mean?" The second category includes questions of whether moral judgments are universal or relative, of one kind or many kinds, etc. Questions of the third kind ask, for example, how we can know if something is right or wrong, if at all.
1) What is the meaning of moral terms or judgments? (moral semantics)
2) What is the nature of moral judgments? (moral ontology)
3) How may moral judgments be supported or defended? (moral epistemology) A question of the first type might be, "What do the words 'good', 'bad', 'right' and 'wrong' mean?" The second category includes questions of whether moral judgments are universal or relative, of one kind or many kinds, etc. Questions of the third kind ask, for example, how we can know if something is right or wrong, if at all.
by yyuryyubicuryy4me January 01, 2019