The paradigm of Kant's judgement as a thing in itself--a single forma in the person's world interior.
The paradigm of Kant's judgement as distinct from Kant's AESTHETIC judgement.
The paradigm that sense has a structure unique and individual in a person that corresponds to plural structures outside of that self-same person.
The paradigm of Kant's judgement as distinct from Kant's AESTHETIC judgement.
The paradigm that sense has a structure unique and individual in a person that corresponds to plural structures outside of that self-same person.
Kant's sense-in-itself is known today as the forma...an orthogonality between the SET of twin-primes and the set of primes.
This orthogonality exists in the singular sense inside of a person and exists in the plural form in the individual's world-exterior. This confirms Kant's notion that not only does an individual contain sense but the world-exterior is made up of a person's senses.
The forma is in fact a structure-of-ethics..
This orthogonality exists in the singular sense inside of a person and exists in the plural form in the individual's world-exterior. This confirms Kant's notion that not only does an individual contain sense but the world-exterior is made up of a person's senses.
The forma is in fact a structure-of-ethics..
by flightfacilities May 16, 2022
Kantianism is a theory that argues that; in the mind; sense triumphs over the present moment. This is because consideration always requires counting; but counting does not always require consideration...
Kantianism argues that free will exists because the uncountable set of points in the Tarski-interior count themselves.
The countable set of points in a non-Tarski plane is provided by the sense-path (polynominalism). The uncountable set of points in a non-Tarski space is provided by sublumination from The Maya: this is the information from the present moment.
The uncountable set is able to count itself because of meta-nominalism the ability of numbers to count themselves or--more-locally-to-the-mind--precession--the 1:1 relationship between the interior-points of the non-Tarski space and the Fauvic spaces.
The countable set of points in a non-Tarski plane is provided by the sense-path (polynominalism). The uncountable set of points in a non-Tarski space is provided by sublumination from The Maya: this is the information from the present moment.
The uncountable set is able to count itself because of meta-nominalism the ability of numbers to count themselves or--more-locally-to-the-mind--precession--the 1:1 relationship between the interior-points of the non-Tarski space and the Fauvic spaces.
by flightfacilities May 12, 2022
A dialectic in which, over the course of a non-Tarski space, an uncountable set of points called 'Tarski-interior points' yield to an infinite set of points entering the mind non-Tarski space or transfinite-space via supersymmetry.
The infinite set of points enters the transfinite (non-Tarski) space via poly-nominalism from super-symmetry; while the uncountable set exists in the Tarski-interior via sub-lumination uncountable movement from Maya.
In plain English--consideration (path-of-sense) wins over counting (momentous information) in the plane-of-the-mind.
The infinite set of points enters the transfinite (non-Tarski) space via poly-nominalism from super-symmetry; while the uncountable set exists in the Tarski-interior via sub-lumination uncountable movement from Maya.
In plain English--consideration (path-of-sense) wins over counting (momentous information) in the plane-of-the-mind.
Kantianism is a theory of free will in-the-mind.
It relies on an external device called 'aesthetic process judgement' or The Limina, called "forma-spinning."
It argues that; in the mind; sense triumphs over the present moment. This is because consideration is always counting; but counting is not always consideration.
The Kantian dialectic relies on an external device Kant called the 'thing-in-itself' or "free-will-in-itself."
It relies on an external device called 'aesthetic process judgement' or The Limina, called "forma-spinning."
It argues that; in the mind; sense triumphs over the present moment. This is because consideration is always counting; but counting is not always consideration.
The Kantian dialectic relies on an external device Kant called the 'thing-in-itself' or "free-will-in-itself."
by flightfacilities May 12, 2022
That the infinite line of complex numbers is divided by the uncountable set of complex integrals.
These complex integrals have a tautological relationship with a group of pseudorandom numbers.
Furthermore; one's intentions have a bijective relationship with one's thoughts because the pseudorandom numbers are one's thoughts.
These complex integrals have a tautological relationship with a group of pseudorandom numbers.
Furthermore; one's intentions have a bijective relationship with one's thoughts because the pseudorandom numbers are one's thoughts.
The Greatest Fact In The Universe is the inversion of nominalism: inverted nominalism...
In inverted nominalism, the infinite set of complex numbers is divided by the uncountable set of trienes each of which have a surface area of one. Furthermore the uncountable SET of of trienes, called the triene-function, ALSO has a surface area of 1.
Thus, it is the complex INTEGRALS that are the trienes and NOT the complex numbers that are the trienes.
This is in contrast to nominalism in which an infinite number of Tarski breaks divides an uncountable group of Tarski lines due to the spinning of the dark-gravity-points at the edge of sublumination..
In inverted nominalism, the infinite set of complex numbers is divided by the uncountable set of trienes each of which have a surface area of one. Furthermore the uncountable SET of of trienes, called the triene-function, ALSO has a surface area of 1.
Thus, it is the complex INTEGRALS that are the trienes and NOT the complex numbers that are the trienes.
This is in contrast to nominalism in which an infinite number of Tarski breaks divides an uncountable group of Tarski lines due to the spinning of the dark-gravity-points at the edge of sublumination..
by flightfacilities May 06, 2022
Proposal that any one conundrum in economics has a one-to-one relationship with a conundrum in economics.
That is to say: any one problem in computer science pertains to a single problem in economics and vice versa.
That is to say: any one problem in computer science pertains to a single problem in economics and vice versa.
Uniting a functional query-language and a data query-language into a single Json-DAG is an example of econometrics as it would solve the problem of manifolds' manufacturing at-scale.
by flightfacilities November 18, 2021
Paradigm in which capitalism fools a country into fighting the most unwinnable wars first; before any feasible wars.
Also a racialist paradigm which recognizes only the discretic elements of scientific thought (elements of the periodic table etc.) and thus only recognizes only European contributions to history.
Also a racialist paradigm which recognizes only the discretic elements of scientific thought (elements of the periodic table etc.) and thus only recognizes only European contributions to history.
Adolf Hitler fashioned himself as an opponent of capitalism; but his invasion of Poland and Europe's Eastern Front indicates he was a capitalist under the purview of continentalism.
by flightfacilities December 18, 2021
An adjective that states that a change in an open system in a line is a change in a closed system in a plane.
Temperature changes along a Tarski-line in an ultra-finite open system.
This translates to a color-change across a plane in quantum probability.
Quantum probability thus is a stochastic system and exists in a closed system.
This translates to a color-change across a plane in quantum probability.
Quantum probability thus is a stochastic system and exists in a closed system.
by flightfacilities November 20, 2020