The Next Michle Jordan
Despite what people say, he is not a ball hog, cuz if you call Kobe a ball hog, your calling MJ a ball hog, and MJ is no ball hog. Kobe actually does average 5 assists a game, and will do best for his team. He's a deadly 3-Point Shooter and the best player currently at driving and dunking the basket
Kobe Currently has taken the Los Angeles Lakers team, Who has lost Shaq and Karl Malone, to the playoffs. The 2006 Lakers team where counted out to be the worst team in all the NBA next to the Bobcats, Knicks, and Jazz. The players were Lamar Odem, who only averaged 14 points a game, Smush Parker, an undrafted rookie, Luke Walton, a rookie, Kwame Brown, who has been plaing for 3 years, and Brian Cook, another rookie. Yet, despite the bad team around him, the Lakers made it to the playoffs due to Kobe's 35 Points a game, 5 assists a game, 5 rebounds a game, and strong defensive plays, most of them being steals. So to you Kobe haters: HAH!
In the playoffs, the Lakers Chocked, as Phil Jackson said to Kobe, "Pass the ball more" and as a result, Kobe got 26 Points a game and the lakers lost 4-3 to the suns in the playoffs
Despite what people say, he is not a ball hog, cuz if you call Kobe a ball hog, your calling MJ a ball hog, and MJ is no ball hog. Kobe actually does average 5 assists a game, and will do best for his team. He's a deadly 3-Point Shooter and the best player currently at driving and dunking the basket
Kobe Currently has taken the Los Angeles Lakers team, Who has lost Shaq and Karl Malone, to the playoffs. The 2006 Lakers team where counted out to be the worst team in all the NBA next to the Bobcats, Knicks, and Jazz. The players were Lamar Odem, who only averaged 14 points a game, Smush Parker, an undrafted rookie, Luke Walton, a rookie, Kwame Brown, who has been plaing for 3 years, and Brian Cook, another rookie. Yet, despite the bad team around him, the Lakers made it to the playoffs due to Kobe's 35 Points a game, 5 assists a game, 5 rebounds a game, and strong defensive plays, most of them being steals. So to you Kobe haters: HAH!
In the playoffs, the Lakers Chocked, as Phil Jackson said to Kobe, "Pass the ball more" and as a result, Kobe got 26 Points a game and the lakers lost 4-3 to the suns in the playoffs
Dude, did you see that buzzer-beater Kobe Bryant Shot when the lakers were down by 1 with 2 seconds left to play? What a game!
by Spikesy May 29, 2006
Major League Baseball, the league that was popular and beloved by all. Children, Seners, Girls, Boys, there wasn't a person in America who didn't follow the MLB and talk about it everyday. And a day at an MLB park, was a nice friendly excperience.
Nowadays, if you try to talk baseball with someone they replie back with a smartass responce. And a day at the ballpark can become violent, especially if your a Dodger fan at Giants stadium, or vise-versa.
Who's to blame? All the unamerican bastards who hate baseball and are slowing down the popularity of this one fine sport. Nobody is forcing you to follow the MLB or baseball in general, but to hate baseball just because we're american, is just stupid. Why pick sports to watch anyway? Sports are sports, The MLB isn't the most exciting sport to watch, but it's still a very interesting and fun sport to watch.
Nowadays, if you try to talk baseball with someone they replie back with a smartass responce. And a day at the ballpark can become violent, especially if your a Dodger fan at Giants stadium, or vise-versa.
Who's to blame? All the unamerican bastards who hate baseball and are slowing down the popularity of this one fine sport. Nobody is forcing you to follow the MLB or baseball in general, but to hate baseball just because we're american, is just stupid. Why pick sports to watch anyway? Sports are sports, The MLB isn't the most exciting sport to watch, but it's still a very interesting and fun sport to watch.
Long time ago:
Person #1: Hey, did you see that Angel game yesterday?
Person #2: Hell yes I did, Angels kick ass! Theres nothing like a nice friendly MLB game!
Currently:
Person #1: Hey, did you see that Angel game yeaterday?
Person #2: BASEBALL!? Baseball is a boring, stupid, unathletic sport full of fat 'roid monkeys who run in circles.
Person #1: Hey, did you see that Angel game yesterday?
Person #2: Hell yes I did, Angels kick ass! Theres nothing like a nice friendly MLB game!
Currently:
Person #1: Hey, did you see that Angel game yeaterday?
Person #2: BASEBALL!? Baseball is a boring, stupid, unathletic sport full of fat 'roid monkeys who run in circles.
by Spikesy July 09, 2006
Most of the time are nice people who don't push there beliefs on Christians, just as most of the time christians don't push there belifs on Atheist's. The Media, makes both seem true. But dont get me wrong, there are both types. My science teacher back in 6th grade had once said to a student that he would love to tell him the truth about Christianity, and if it wasn't for laws stopping him he would. That's the example of the bad kind, someone who has to to push opinions all over people, and the fact that he was like 11 years old was especially stupid.
The atheist belief though, is often strange. Atheist belive in no higher power, however there is no evidence that they are right. The Big Bang theory is a theory, not fact, and even if there was a big bang, where did THAT come from? Life is so uncertain and history is unclear to know what happensa and what has happened.
But no matter what it will always be this way: Where there is faith and hope, there is always someone to ruin it. Like I said, there is always the good kind who dont push it on people, science in generel seems to push belifs like this. People were a whole lot happier not knowing all these scientific facts supposedly disaproving there whole life and belifs, why does it have to be that way? They say ignorance is bliss, BUT they are not provin ignorant yet! The way I see it, everything but medical science is not neccisarily needed. Science has created the very things we fear, chemical weapons. Science sheds light on the world, but the light can kill you. The whole basic idea of science is to find out what every single thing really is. I honestly do not care if everything but lighning is made of atoms, but I really care those same atoms could destroy a whole country.
The atheist belief though, is often strange. Atheist belive in no higher power, however there is no evidence that they are right. The Big Bang theory is a theory, not fact, and even if there was a big bang, where did THAT come from? Life is so uncertain and history is unclear to know what happensa and what has happened.
But no matter what it will always be this way: Where there is faith and hope, there is always someone to ruin it. Like I said, there is always the good kind who dont push it on people, science in generel seems to push belifs like this. People were a whole lot happier not knowing all these scientific facts supposedly disaproving there whole life and belifs, why does it have to be that way? They say ignorance is bliss, BUT they are not provin ignorant yet! The way I see it, everything but medical science is not neccisarily needed. Science has created the very things we fear, chemical weapons. Science sheds light on the world, but the light can kill you. The whole basic idea of science is to find out what every single thing really is. I honestly do not care if everything but lighning is made of atoms, but I really care those same atoms could destroy a whole country.
by Spikesy July 05, 2006
1/4 of the game of football. For one, in Football you can forword pass, in Rugby you run, and you flip it to other players. You don't need to be smart in Rugby, because there is no strategy. The whole game is a group of players taking a ball and trying to run with it into an endzone. How is that fun, anyway? I have seen several Rugby games (Mostly at the ESPN Zone in Anaheim) and I honestly have no idea what the hell is so great about it.
Tackling in Rugby is latching onto another player and getting them to the ground. In American football tackling is running as fast as you can and delivering a blow to the gut. Other tackles include the helmit to chin move, Where The only thing stopping the person teach from going into there gums is a mouth guard.
Becasue there is no strategy, there are no breaks, and as a result it is very fast paced. Maybe in Europe is is a good thing, around here we don't care less about how many commercials there are. Commercails just make the game longer anyway.
Most people from europe say it's better than American Football. Most people from europe also do not have American Football.
Rugby for girls? Are you retarded? Pads make the game HARDER AND MORE HARD HITTING!! Seriesly, who the fuck said football is for pussys!? HAVE YOU SEEN A GAME OF FOOTBALL!? Pads add about 15 pounds (8 KG I think) and shoulder and leg pads make a hit hurt ten times worse, and a helmit is made of METAL. Do you know how much it hurts to get a huge ass piece of metal hitting right at your gut?? Obviously, anyone saying that is retarded and shouldn't be aloud to live.
Tackling in Rugby is latching onto another player and getting them to the ground. In American football tackling is running as fast as you can and delivering a blow to the gut. Other tackles include the helmit to chin move, Where The only thing stopping the person teach from going into there gums is a mouth guard.
Becasue there is no strategy, there are no breaks, and as a result it is very fast paced. Maybe in Europe is is a good thing, around here we don't care less about how many commercials there are. Commercails just make the game longer anyway.
Most people from europe say it's better than American Football. Most people from europe also do not have American Football.
Rugby for girls? Are you retarded? Pads make the game HARDER AND MORE HARD HITTING!! Seriesly, who the fuck said football is for pussys!? HAVE YOU SEEN A GAME OF FOOTBALL!? Pads add about 15 pounds (8 KG I think) and shoulder and leg pads make a hit hurt ten times worse, and a helmit is made of METAL. Do you know how much it hurts to get a huge ass piece of metal hitting right at your gut?? Obviously, anyone saying that is retarded and shouldn't be aloud to live.
I've watched American Football and Rugby, and American Football is better. Maybe if you've watched both you'd agree.
by Spikesy July 18, 2006
A game played by a bunch of euro-trash 200 lb. men who ware really short pants, and is watched by a bunch of rich euro-trash men who think Rugby is better than Football because in football you have pads. Honestly, who could not LIVE through ONE GAME, without pads in football. I mean, a game lasts 4 hours and you get tackled every play. There is one term in football called a sack, where a 400 lb. Defensive End (Who can bench press 200-350 lb.) will tackle the querterback. The QB is 175-225 FUCKIN POUNDS! Now let me tell you, a hard enough hit could very well paralyze him for life (And it's happened before. Just like when Oakland Raider's Safety Jack Tatum tackled a New England Wide Reciever to paralize him for life in the 80's.)
Misconceptions about Football:
1. There usually are no substitutions unless you have a very big lead, becuase the coach dosn't want his players to get severely injured
2. You only get 3 timeouts a half, I mean they are hardly noticible
3. The men in football arn't fat, just very muscular, in both there arms in legs
4. It's not homosexual, just like Rugby's not homosexual.
Things that suck about Rugby:
1. It's called a man's sport but is played by women and people in wheelchairs.
2. It's watched by upper-class Euro-trash
3. All of it's fans say it's better than Football but have never seen football game in there life (Unless they live in Germany)
4. It dosn't require nearly enough strategy as football
5. They were very short pants
6. It's a wannabe version of football
7. It's boring compared to Football, Basketball, Baseball, and even SOCCER!
8. SOCCER is better than this game!
Misconceptions about Football:
1. There usually are no substitutions unless you have a very big lead, becuase the coach dosn't want his players to get severely injured
2. You only get 3 timeouts a half, I mean they are hardly noticible
3. The men in football arn't fat, just very muscular, in both there arms in legs
4. It's not homosexual, just like Rugby's not homosexual.
Things that suck about Rugby:
1. It's called a man's sport but is played by women and people in wheelchairs.
2. It's watched by upper-class Euro-trash
3. All of it's fans say it's better than Football but have never seen football game in there life (Unless they live in Germany)
4. It dosn't require nearly enough strategy as football
5. They were very short pants
6. It's a wannabe version of football
7. It's boring compared to Football, Basketball, Baseball, and even SOCCER!
8. SOCCER is better than this game!
Yeah football players were pads and helmets, but for one the helmets look cool as fuck and keep both your head from cracking and from 400 lb. men from snapping your neck, and the pads prevent people from giving you bruises all over your body.
And Yeah, Rugby dosn't have pads or helmets, but you have to take into account Rugby players arn't that big and a Linebacker or Defensive end in football can be 2x the size of a rugby player, and a defensive end and linebacker both have to tackle men who are half there size. I mean, if American Football didn't have padding everyone on the offense would be dead at the end of the game, as these guys can lift up 300 lb. and can run 40 yards in 4 seconds. Now when you have a 400 lb. guy who can lift 300 lb. and is running 10 yards a second and he's comming right after you that will cause you to be paralyzed every single time, pads or not.
All in all, Rugby is for a bunch of rich 200 lb. pussies who argue that it is better and more hard hitting even though football players are twize there size and can run much faster then them. It's a boring sport that's fans are obviously are all idiots and wastes of life because they talk shit about a sport they no nothing about and should just shut there Euro-Trash mouths!
P.S. I know I'm getting a thumbs down for this
And Yeah, Rugby dosn't have pads or helmets, but you have to take into account Rugby players arn't that big and a Linebacker or Defensive end in football can be 2x the size of a rugby player, and a defensive end and linebacker both have to tackle men who are half there size. I mean, if American Football didn't have padding everyone on the offense would be dead at the end of the game, as these guys can lift up 300 lb. and can run 40 yards in 4 seconds. Now when you have a 400 lb. guy who can lift 300 lb. and is running 10 yards a second and he's comming right after you that will cause you to be paralyzed every single time, pads or not.
All in all, Rugby is for a bunch of rich 200 lb. pussies who argue that it is better and more hard hitting even though football players are twize there size and can run much faster then them. It's a boring sport that's fans are obviously are all idiots and wastes of life because they talk shit about a sport they no nothing about and should just shut there Euro-Trash mouths!
P.S. I know I'm getting a thumbs down for this
by Spikesy May 27, 2006
A game played by a bunch of euro-trash 200 lb. men who ware really short pants, and is watched by a bunch of rich euro-trash men who think Rugby is better than Football because in football you have pads. Honestly, who could not LIVE through ONE GAME, without pads in football. I mean, a game lasts 4 hours and you get tackled every play. There is one term in football called a sack, where a 400 lb. Defensive End (Who can bench press 200-350 lb.) will tackle the querterback. The QB is 175-225 FUCKIN POUNDS! Now let me tell you, a hard enough hit could very well paralyze him for life (And it's happened before. Just like when Oakland Raider's Safety Jack Tatum tackled a New England Wide Reciever to paralize him for life in the 80's.)
Misconceptions about Football:
1. There usually are no substitutions unless you have a very big lead, becuase the coach dosn't want his players to get severely injured
2. You only get 3 timeouts a half, I mean they are hardly noticible
3. The men in football arn't fat, just very muscular, in both there arms in legs
4. It's not homosexual, just like Rugby's not homosexual.
Things that suck about Rugby:
1. It's called a man's sport but is played by women and people in wheelchairs.
2. It's watched by upper-class Euro-trash
3. All of it's fans say it's better than Football but have never seen football game in there life (Unless they live in Germany)
4. It dosn't require nearly enough strategy as football
5. They were very short pants
6. It's a wannabe version of football
7. It's boring compared to Football, Basketball, Baseball, and even SOCCER!
8. SOCCER is better than this game!
Misconceptions about Football:
1. There usually are no substitutions unless you have a very big lead, becuase the coach dosn't want his players to get severely injured
2. You only get 3 timeouts a half, I mean they are hardly noticible
3. The men in football arn't fat, just very muscular, in both there arms in legs
4. It's not homosexual, just like Rugby's not homosexual.
Things that suck about Rugby:
1. It's called a man's sport but is played by women and people in wheelchairs.
2. It's watched by upper-class Euro-trash
3. All of it's fans say it's better than Football but have never seen football game in there life (Unless they live in Germany)
4. It dosn't require nearly enough strategy as football
5. They were very short pants
6. It's a wannabe version of football
7. It's boring compared to Football, Basketball, Baseball, and even SOCCER!
8. SOCCER is better than this game!
Yeah football players were pads and helmets, but for one the helmets look cool as fuck and keep both your head from cracking and from 400 lb. men from snapping your neck, and the pads prevent people from giving you bruises all over your body.
And Yeah, Rugby dosn't have pads or helmets, but you have to take into account Rugby players arn't that big and a Linebacker or Defensive end in football can be 2x the size of a rugby player, and a defensive end and linebacker both have to tackle men who are half there size. I mean, if American Football didn't have padding everyone on the offense would be dead at the end of the game, as these guys can lift up 300 lb. and can run 40 yards in 4 seconds. Now when you have a 400 lb. guy who can lift 300 lb. and is running 10 yards a second and he's comming right after you that will cause you to be paralyzed every single time, pads or not.
All in all, Rugby is for a bunch of rich 200 lb. pussies who argue that it is better and more hard hitting even though football players are twize there size and can run much faster then them. It's a boring sport that's fans are obviously are all idiots and wastes of life because they talk shit about a sport they no nothing about and should just shut there Euro-Trash mouths!
P.S. I know I'm getting a thumbs down for this
And Yeah, Rugby dosn't have pads or helmets, but you have to take into account Rugby players arn't that big and a Linebacker or Defensive end in football can be 2x the size of a rugby player, and a defensive end and linebacker both have to tackle men who are half there size. I mean, if American Football didn't have padding everyone on the offense would be dead at the end of the game, as these guys can lift up 300 lb. and can run 40 yards in 4 seconds. Now when you have a 400 lb. guy who can lift 300 lb. and is running 10 yards a second and he's comming right after you that will cause you to be paralyzed every single time, pads or not.
All in all, Rugby is for a bunch of rich 200 lb. pussies who argue that it is better and more hard hitting even though football players are twize there size and can run much faster then them. It's a boring sport that's fans are obviously are all idiots and wastes of life because they talk shit about a sport they no nothing about and should just shut there Euro-Trash mouths!
P.S. I know I'm getting a thumbs down for this
by Spikesy May 16, 2006
I went to the theature and saw Blair Witch project and thought it was the best movie ever... Then when I bought it I relized it was fake and now it's a so-so movie
by Spikesy July 21, 2006