Definitions by QuacksO
he didn't actually pay Paul, though
Nope --- devious and undisciplined shyster dat he was, he did indeed rob Peter to obtain funds to pay Paul back, but then he used said stolen funds to just engage in more foolish spending (which of course is why he'd had to borrow money from Paul in da first place!). Shame on him.
One should be very wary of loaning money in any case, even if da requester says he needs da cash just to "pay back Paul" (i.e., to settle a debt he presently owes to someone else)... you should first research da requester's past performance in such matters; you will often discover dat some of his past loans were indeed supposedly earmarked for setting his debts with Paul, but he didn't actually pay Paul, though.
he didn't actually pay Paul, though by QuacksO July 24, 2019
misscreant
A female delinquent. Her "fairer gender" means that she can get away with a lot more --- or be punished a lot less (think Mary Kay Letourneau, who only served a comparatively short sentence for a super-serious crime that a man in the same position would likely have gotten decades of prison time) --- than a guy trying the same shenanigans.
The use of misscreants to aid in committing crimes has long been practiced --- people are just naturally more trusting of females, and so they tend not to be monitored so closely as their male counterparts would be. Adult men looking to steal from a place of business often send girls or younger women into said store beforehand to either distract the staffpeople or to commit the pilfering themselves.
misscreant by QuacksO July 23, 2019
a**h**e safety-net
A.k.a. "a**h**e insurance". Refers to where you habitually bring a really intolerably-obnoxious human along with you on potentially-dangerous excursions, such as on an airline-trip, into battle or a "bad" part of town, on a road-trip through natural-disaster areas like flooding or rock-slides, into a hazardous-materials area, etc., to better your own chances of survival. The theory behind this practice, of course, is that whenever there is a widespread catastrophe or other mass-annihilation incident, statistically the "nice" folks are usually the ones who get killed, while the super-nasty inhabitants in the disaster-area invariably seem to escape with little or no injury. So the obvious conclusion would be that if you "keep your friends close and your enemies even closer" (i.e., always stay right next to the acridly-antisocial hombre who's accompanying you), the Fate gods --- who apparently like and favor the mean folks, since they always seem to spare them --- will be hesitant to allow anything harmful to occur in your vicinity, since they would not want to risk harming or killing one of their precious meanie-jerks, as well. Simple, but effective, and a lot cheaper and more reliable than buying death/accident-insurance.
The concept of the "a**h**e safety-net" is nothing new --- it's actually just kinda the reverse of taking hostages: while the latter involves keeping desirable people close to you so that their fellow humans will not send bullets or bombs your way for fear of hurting their abducted loved ones, the former strategy also utilizes the "human shield" concept, but in the exact opposite way... no respectable human being would give a rat's a** if your cranky-natured companion were eliminated ("Good riddance!"), but the Gods of Fate would indeed wish to maintain the well-being of such miscreant, and so they will feel forced to let you live on, as well.
a**h**e safety-net by QuacksO July 23, 2019
even a baby could do it
Often when an adult snortingly grumbles that, "Even a baby could do it!" when a child either doesn't understand instructions or is too timid/weak to perform some action, the truth is that the grownup is **himself** not able to explain or carry out the task, either, and so he is merely trying to make himself feel better by verbally putting down the poor innocent child. Pathetic.
even a baby could do it by QuacksO July 23, 2019
blow-bye
Da "inefficient" and "resource-wasting" female-on-male equivalent of da classic "wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am" male-on-female "casual quickie"; it involves da gal's merely getting da guy off with her mouth and then unceremoniously leaving, rather than staying around "after da fun is over" to share conversation and see if maybe a long-term romance might be possible.
I suppose dat "non-romantic" fellatio might indeed have its place on certain occasions (like if a cash-strapped gal needs to "purchase" a guy's one-time emergency-assistance), but dat's definitely not for me... I always make sure to get to know a chick at least a little bit and see if we :"click" before I ask her for oral sex, so dat hopefully there will be more "action" between us than just a blow-bye.
beefcake beauty
A beefcake beauty can be a good choice for a guy who tends to unconsciously be a bit too rough when excitedly savoring a gal's four "pleeze squeeze theeze" fleshy-mounds --- if you always start out with the chick's fairly-robust-fleshed posterior and totally "knock yourself out" with your enthusiastic kneading of said ample appendages, your hands will be achy and tired by the time you move around to her multiple-D-sized --- and much more tender --- fun-bubbles located up front, and so you'll be less likely to apply excessive force when giving them some lovin', too.
beefcake beauty by QuacksO July 23, 2019
coallateral
Black sooty anthracite-chunks dat you let someone retain as a "promissory note" in case you are unable to pay back a loan dat he gave you; da understanding is dat he can burn said heating-fuel in his own furnace if you default on said loan.
In da infamous tale of da pet monkey whose snarky-faced shenanigans caused irate rail-workers in passing trains to throw lumps of coal at him (and thus unwittingly provide da monkey's owner with free heating-fuel), da railroad-company was understandably upset dat dey were loosing considerable amounts of their good locomotive-fuel from this "coallateral damage".
coallateral by QuacksO July 23, 2019