Gregory V. Richardson's definitions

udidic

A speaking style characterized by using words of ones own devise that are registered with Urban Dictionary. The recipient of such words who does not understand them may be baffled thereby, but can learn the true meaning of the words by Googling them.

In his udidic manner, he said to her, "You're so septicious!" She thought it was a compliment until she Googled the word and found out what he really meant.

by Gregory V. Richardson July 19, 2004

wifal

Of or related to a wife. Variation of wifel.

She chose to be an at home mother whose wifal duties including transporting children to various social activities.

by Gregory V. Richardson February 7, 2004

aqalflage

This word combines the "AQAL" (all quadrants, all levels, all lines, all states, all types) Integral Theory of Ken Wilber with the basic word "camouflage". So, the meaning is that of ostensibly expressing the psychology of the AQAL model, but in fact either deliberately or accidentally not doing so, therefore AQAL insight is camouflaged by the words.

John's wordy and misguided theory about applying the psychology of Ken Wilber's AQAL model to business practices proved to be mere aqalflage because John did not understand the AQAL model.

by Gregory V. Richardson September 5, 2004

larrilism

This is a statement which is partially true, stated with conviction, and which may initially seem correct to other people, but the statement is off the mark in some way. It is named after Larry Ray Richardson who is prone to such statements when he talks of things outside of his area of expertise (business).

As Larry said today (10 April 2004) when talking of how a man can metaphorically sell his own brother for profit, "It's like the story of David in the Bible." He meant the story of Joseph.

by Gregory V. Richardson April 10, 2004

pandacious

Seeing things in a black and white manner, like the colors of a panda.

Viewing life as extremes.

Unable to see a middle ground.

In his pandacious view, other people were either for him or against him.

by Gregory V. Richardson November 30, 2003