The one thing that stands between the masses and the ramblings of pre-pubescent, ghetto-homeboys. This title is easily obtained, but is a public service that the community should use more often, which would keep at least some idiocies off the internet.
Fortunately, most editors have common sense and abide by the rules, although one can be sure that not all do.
Fortunately, most editors have common sense and abide by the rules, although one can be sure that not all do.
by Kevitto August 7, 2007
1: Dude, I submitted a really long definition yesterday, and the Urban Dictionary editors rejected it for no reason!
2: That sucks.
2: That sucks.
by Lucio Soph August 7, 2010
A mother fucking dumbshit who doesn't know how to publish a good quality word. These people do their jobs like shit and need to learn the definition of good.
by Samuel Sanudo March 3, 2015
random people on urban dictionary who look over the thousands of definitions coming through daily, and subsequently pick the most common, repetitive, useless definitions to approve.
while the rest of us spend grueling hours racking our genius minds coming up with many eloquent, well explained definitions to uncommon and obscure words, these urban dictionary editors simply seem blind to even minuscule amounts of talent, ignoring all of our futile efforts.
many are left dismayed and irked by the utter incompetency of the majority of 'editors' on this site. i can only pray that the good editors (though few in number) will stumble upon my definitions and submit them for approval.
while the rest of us spend grueling hours racking our genius minds coming up with many eloquent, well explained definitions to uncommon and obscure words, these urban dictionary editors simply seem blind to even minuscule amounts of talent, ignoring all of our futile efforts.
many are left dismayed and irked by the utter incompetency of the majority of 'editors' on this site. i can only pray that the good editors (though few in number) will stumble upon my definitions and submit them for approval.
feeling like a karen, might get all bitchy and complain about the urban dictionary editors again
person 1: "urban dictionary is the best!"
person 2 (not published): "yeah, when the urban dictionary editors approve ur submissions."
person 3: don't be so petty.
hi urban dictionary editors, hope this non hate speech is meaningful
person 1: "urban dictionary is the best!"
person 2 (not published): "yeah, when the urban dictionary editors approve ur submissions."
person 3: don't be so petty.
hi urban dictionary editors, hope this non hate speech is meaningful
by cozyvixen October 28, 2021
Faggots who never publish my definitions because they're mad that I'm right. They probably jack off to My Hero Academia Porn on a daily basis and scratch their balls and cum before they touch their food.
Gay faggot: *Sees my definition*
Also gay faggot: *Deletes definition*
Still gay faggot: *Sees another definition that talks about why autism comes from vaccines and publishes it*
Finally gay faggot: It feels good to lose brain cells by being out out of many autistic Urban Dictionary Editors :D
Also gay faggot: *Deletes definition*
Still gay faggot: *Sees another definition that talks about why autism comes from vaccines and publishes it*
Finally gay faggot: It feels good to lose brain cells by being out out of many autistic Urban Dictionary Editors :D
by MyGlockHard April 22, 2020
people who reject everything that they can, just to make the most pathetic dictionary in the world, where people can invent their own words AND get them rejected, only to watch some guy make up a word that makes no sence, and he/she gets it published.
hey, i'll publish a word in the urban dictionary... oh, its been rejected :( DAMN THOSE SILLY URBAN DICTIONARY EDITORS.
by ha.leh.lu.jah September 30, 2009
Retards who publish pornographic, offensive definitions, and then turn down a beautiful definition of my wife's name that was in no way offensive or sexually perverted.
"Those guys are such urban dictionary editors"
by DaKine1981 February 3, 2010