Why do kids from UCLA feel the need to bash USC so much? If they feel they are so superior, why do they seem to get off on bashing the "inferior" USC? Aren't they supposed to be "above" that? I thought UCLA kids were supposed to be "smart." Since when does "smart" correlate with "derisive, insulting asshats"?
Insulting and elitist: bad combination, UCLA, and you're not even a Northeastern Ivy or anything.
Oh, and insulting USC by saying it's in the ghetto? Not cool. If you don't like "racist" Trojans commenting on all the "yellow people" at UCLA, trying to get at 'SC for saying its in the ghetto (i.e. in the black part of town) is JUST as hypocritical. Since when is being located or coming from a certain place apt reason for insulting?
Insulting and elitist: bad combination, UCLA, and you're not even a Northeastern Ivy or anything.
Oh, and insulting USC by saying it's in the ghetto? Not cool. If you don't like "racist" Trojans commenting on all the "yellow people" at UCLA, trying to get at 'SC for saying its in the ghetto (i.e. in the black part of town) is JUST as hypocritical. Since when is being located or coming from a certain place apt reason for insulting?
UCLA kid: Hah hah hah, I have no life! I like looking at college rankings and getting off on how USC is ranked so low compared to UCLA!
Person #1: Blah blah blah. Everyone knows that UCLA is just where the cheap people or the Berk rejects go. Enjoy your three years as a sophomore at UCLA, prick!
Person #1: Blah blah blah. Everyone knows that UCLA is just where the cheap people or the Berk rejects go. Enjoy your three years as a sophomore at UCLA, prick!
USC graduates populate elite executives positions throughout Southern California. UCLA grads make great (well, OK) employees.
by Soloman September 17, 2005
UCLA students spend an average of 6 years in order to graduate (cuz they're so poor and need to work)
by bruinshave2muchtime September 5, 2003
A decent labor pool for USC gradutes to choose from to fill menial positions. However, said 'SC alum generally prefer to pick from graduates of UCLA's non-joke big brother, Cal.
Need someone to get that filing cabinet in order? I hear UCLA grads are cheap, why not try one of those?
by Bruins4Lyfe November 14, 2005
Trojankiller needs to check his facts. "What do UCLA and USC students have in common? They were all admitted to USC"?
Yeah, right.
If he cares so much about statistics, he should check out and see that plenty of USC students turned down UCLA, even though it was "superior."
Maybe because they weren't tightwads. Maybe because they didn't want to spend two years finishing their freshman classes, and having to go through two more years as a "junior." Maybe because they didn't want to spend college as a number. Or, you know, maybe because they wanted a good football team. Also, maybe because they weren't such asshats.
Yeah, right.
If he cares so much about statistics, he should check out and see that plenty of USC students turned down UCLA, even though it was "superior."
Maybe because they weren't tightwads. Maybe because they didn't want to spend two years finishing their freshman classes, and having to go through two more years as a "junior." Maybe because they didn't want to spend college as a number. Or, you know, maybe because they wanted a good football team. Also, maybe because they weren't such asshats.
If you like the US News and World Report Rankings so much, you should see that UCLA has been on a decline-- from the #17 best school in the nation in 1990 to #25 in 2005. USC, on the other hand, jumped from #41 to #30 in the span of only five years (2000-2005).
Watch UCLA gradually lose those precious rankings, and watch USC continue to succeed.
Watch UCLA gradually lose those precious rankings, and watch USC continue to succeed.
by Fight On! May 10, 2005
UCLA...
What's to say?
They USED to be better academically than USC.
They USED to be better in sports than USC.
USC is entertaining a steady increase in funding, programs, entering freshman class GPA and SAT (now higher than both UCLA and Berkeley), and average graduate income.
On the other hand, UCLA is, like all public California schools, experiencing a decline in practically every category.
Simple fact: USC is a university now superior in academics, sports, and social scene. What does UCLA have? A nice neighborhood? Cheaper tuition? Sure.. but the average USC student pays nearly the same price that the average UCLA student does. Why? USC financial aid. Get over the price, most of us dont pay $40,000. Well damn, I guess UCLA does have a right to talk all that shit. You go Bruins. At least you learn something at UCLA, even if it is how to be JEALOUS.
What's to say?
They USED to be better academically than USC.
They USED to be better in sports than USC.
USC is entertaining a steady increase in funding, programs, entering freshman class GPA and SAT (now higher than both UCLA and Berkeley), and average graduate income.
On the other hand, UCLA is, like all public California schools, experiencing a decline in practically every category.
Simple fact: USC is a university now superior in academics, sports, and social scene. What does UCLA have? A nice neighborhood? Cheaper tuition? Sure.. but the average USC student pays nearly the same price that the average UCLA student does. Why? USC financial aid. Get over the price, most of us dont pay $40,000. Well damn, I guess UCLA does have a right to talk all that shit. You go Bruins. At least you learn something at UCLA, even if it is how to be JEALOUS.
I go to UCLA, and sure, we're not as cool as USC kids, but we're smarter! Oh wait.. nope.. they've got that to hold over our head now too..
by biomedical_trojan December 5, 2004
The average household income for current students of UCLA is higher than USC, but the average graduate makes considerably less.
by TrojanWarrior November 12, 2004