mottling
i did a bit of mottling last night
Get the mottling mug.
Motting
Giving your girlfriend oral sex while making the sound 'mot' over and over again and holding her flaps back.
Motting by i love motting October 10, 2011
Related Words
Bielsa’s Motting Stool
A stool that a motter may use while delivering oral sex to his lady friend from a seated position at the edge of the bed/motting platform.
Particularly useful if the motter finds himself with an incapacitated lower limb and is unable to assume a standard frontal prone motting position between the mottees legs.
The stool takes inspiration from the legendary Marcelo Bielsa and his infamous stool that could often be spotted pitchside in the technical area.
Particularly useful if the motter finds himself with an incapacitated lower limb and is unable to assume a standard frontal prone motting position between the mottees legs.
The stool takes inspiration from the legendary Marcelo Bielsa and his infamous stool that could often be spotted pitchside in the technical area.
Dislocated the knee again at the weekend and I’m on crutches for the foreseeable, will have to get Bielsa’s Motting Stool out the loft.
Bielsa’s Motting Stool by CumbrianMotter October 9, 2023
motting out
motting out by BigsexyBFG November 12, 2013
Mortling
Motting
To mott is to use the motte-and-bailey fallacy in an argument.
The motte-and-bailey fallacy (named after the motte-and-bailey castle) is a form of argument where an arguer conflates two positions that share similarities, one modest and easy to defend (the "motte") and one much more controversial (the "bailey").The arguer advances the controversial position, but when challenged, they insist that they are only advancing the more modest position. Upon retreating to the motte, the arguer can claim that the bailey has not been refuted (because the critic refused to attack the motte) or that the critic is unreasonable (by equating an attack on the bailey with an attack on the motte).
The motte-and-bailey fallacy (named after the motte-and-bailey castle) is a form of argument where an arguer conflates two positions that share similarities, one modest and easy to defend (the "motte") and one much more controversial (the "bailey").The arguer advances the controversial position, but when challenged, they insist that they are only advancing the more modest position. Upon retreating to the motte, the arguer can claim that the bailey has not been refuted (because the critic refused to attack the motte) or that the critic is unreasonable (by equating an attack on the bailey with an attack on the motte).
A: Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from the consequences of that speech.
B: That's not true. If there is a consequence to any action, that action is not free.
A: Well, I am free to call you a cunt, and the consequences are that you can insult me back. Ipso facto, free speech with consequences.
B. Insulting you would be a consequent, not a consequence. Consequences are consequents of consequence. Your conflating the two is motting.
B: That's not true. If there is a consequence to any action, that action is not free.
A: Well, I am free to call you a cunt, and the consequences are that you can insult me back. Ipso facto, free speech with consequences.
B. Insulting you would be a consequent, not a consequence. Consequences are consequents of consequence. Your conflating the two is motting.
Motting by Redbeard Edward November 26, 2021