It’s a themed restaurant.
by West Bank Big Wank June 3, 2021

One who forces their beliefs down ones throat and will do everything he can to discredit your argument.
See also: Progressive
See also: Progressive
Person 1: Man, that person is always talking about his beliefs, even when I already said I accept people for who they are. Who would do that?
Person 2: A Political Jackass
Person 2: A Political Jackass
by dr.cerealguy January 7, 2016

by Mysters Mizzes July 9, 2020

Politicians who lack a consistent ideology or party affiliation, constantly shifting their allegiances. It could also describe individuals who are politically active but lack a stable base of support or influence, wandering from one political cause to another. Additionally, it might be used to describe people who are politically marginalized or alienated, not fitting neatly into any established political structure.
Here's a breakdown of the potential interpretations:
* Politicians without a fixed political home: These individuals might switch parties or ideologies based on perceived opportunities or personal gain, lacking a strong, consistent belief system.
* Individuals with shifting political allegiances: This could refer to people who are active in different political movements or causes without a long-term commitment to any one.
* Marginalized or alienated political actors: These could be people who feel excluded from mainstream politics and express their views through unconventional or less organized means, moving from one issue to another without finding a stable outlet.
* Those who disrupt or destabilize: In some contexts, "vagabond" can imply a lack of stability or a tendency to disrupt established norms, which might be applied to individuals or groups who challenge the existing political order.
Here's a breakdown of the potential interpretations:
* Politicians without a fixed political home: These individuals might switch parties or ideologies based on perceived opportunities or personal gain, lacking a strong, consistent belief system.
* Individuals with shifting political allegiances: This could refer to people who are active in different political movements or causes without a long-term commitment to any one.
* Marginalized or alienated political actors: These could be people who feel excluded from mainstream politics and express their views through unconventional or less organized means, moving from one issue to another without finding a stable outlet.
* Those who disrupt or destabilize: In some contexts, "vagabond" can imply a lack of stability or a tendency to disrupt established norms, which might be applied to individuals or groups who challenge the existing political order.
Political Vagabonds
by Nhlamulo Ndhlela June 27, 2025

by Dezentual February 24, 2022

Something that is idiotically self-democratized, corrupted and destroyed from the inside to the benefit of some and determent of others.
You: "Oh, when did this world become so political"
You: "oh"
You: "oh"
by Jacob Vilianas August 8, 2025

Liberal political strategy as it relates to social issues. I'm going to break this down to demonstrate that liberals are not smart in any way shape or form and that I AM smart and better than everyone.
Hym "So, 'Why do you care?' politics comes in response to conservative protestations to non-traditional behavior of lifestyles. And it looks like this:"
Trans-gender *exists*
Conservative "Booooo... My incest cult says a magic man forgives all of the bad things I knowingly do and I am immortal... So the tranny can't do that."
Liberal "Why do you care?"
Hym "So, 'Why do you care?' politics comes in response to conservative protestations to non-traditional behavior of lifestyles. And it looks like this:"
Trans-gender *exists*
Conservative "Booooo... My incest cult says a magic man forgives all of the bad things I knowingly do and I am immortal... So the tranny can't do that."
Liberal "Why do you care?"
Hym "And it's a stupid question. But I'll explain it to you anyway. As Matt Walsh recently said, they think that the absence of problems (-P) = doing an incest cult. So, they care because when you have problems you are going to try to reach your grubby little hands into their solipsistic sphere of subjectivity for a solution to those problems and that might require them to do something other than an incest cult. They're locked in. Or WORSE... Someone who isn't doing an incest cult would be absent of problems. -P would = both doing a incest cult and not doing an incest cult. That would violate the law of non-contradiction. BUT! What they fail to understand... Is that giving the incest cult credit for things it didn't do... Is part of the incest cult. So, back to the trans example... When it comes to hiring, treatment, and rights... They want doing a transgenderism to = (P) problems. And they are actively working to make it so. And that is the case for ALL NON-INCEST CULT VARIABLES. So we'll say they want X (Not doing an incest cult) to = P and they want Y (Doing and incest cult) to = -P and they are doing that deliberately. So, in summary, they care because it invalidates the assertion that X = -P and if X /= -P then they might have to grapple withe the fact that X = P for everyone who isn't doing X. 'Why do you care?' Politics won't ever work because they will always shift into apologetics. Which is just meaningless bloviating that doesn't address the actual issue at hand."
by Hym Iam August 7, 2024
