by mandy harvey October 24, 2008
Cooper-I'm so sick of that girl trying to friend me on facebook.
Peyton-Yeah, she is such a Coffee Face Stink Pot!
Peyton-Yeah, she is such a Coffee Face Stink Pot!
by PLR8792 February 10, 2008
Something to say when someone is being rude or putting something in your face, and you want them to back off. Or when someone is coming on too strong with their attitude. Comes from the movie Nacho Libre starring Jack Black when his friend offers him a Corn-on-a-stick.
by Pendenga November 29, 2010
Conversational non-sequitur designed to kill an internet discussion stone dead. Always, ALWAYS, FUCKING ALWAYS DAMMIT to be spelt out as above, capitalised final word, full stop and all. Originated in Scotland.
Dave: Scotland Scotland Scotland
Splog: I don't like your FACE.
Dave: ...
Splog: I don't like your FACE.
Immanuel Kant: Nature is the existence of things, so far as it is determined according to universal laws. Should nature signify the existence of things in themselves, we could never know it either a priori or a posteriori. Not a priori, for how can we know what belongs to things in themselves, since this never can be done by the dissection of our concepts (in analytical judgments)? We do not want to know what is contained in our concept of a thing (for the concept describes what belongs to its logical being), but what is in the actuality of the thing superadded to our concept, and by what the thing itself is determined in its existence outside the concept. Our understanding, and the conditions on which alone it can connect the determinations of things in their existence, do not prescribe any rule to things themselves; these do not conform to our understanding, but it must conform itself to them; they must therefore be first given us in order to gather these determinations from them, wherefore they would not be known a priori.
Splog: I don't like your FACE.
Immanuel Kant: ...
Splog: I don't like your FACE.
Dave: ...
Splog: I don't like your FACE.
Immanuel Kant: Nature is the existence of things, so far as it is determined according to universal laws. Should nature signify the existence of things in themselves, we could never know it either a priori or a posteriori. Not a priori, for how can we know what belongs to things in themselves, since this never can be done by the dissection of our concepts (in analytical judgments)? We do not want to know what is contained in our concept of a thing (for the concept describes what belongs to its logical being), but what is in the actuality of the thing superadded to our concept, and by what the thing itself is determined in its existence outside the concept. Our understanding, and the conditions on which alone it can connect the determinations of things in their existence, do not prescribe any rule to things themselves; these do not conform to our understanding, but it must conform itself to them; they must therefore be first given us in order to gather these determinations from them, wherefore they would not be known a priori.
Splog: I don't like your FACE.
Immanuel Kant: ...
by Your FACE. December 19, 2005
A person who is so fat they can't see their penis and they have trouble getting around, They still live with their parents after the age of 30, and they don't work.
by Johnny is a stupid af name October 04, 2021
When a person is so (ugly) or has alot of marks on their face that their face looks like they got hit in the face with a bag of hot nickels.......the hot nickels would leave disfiguring marks.
Yo man, she's so (ugly) that her face looks like she got hit in the face with a bag of hot nickels
His acne left his face so effed up that he looks like he got hit in the face with a bag of hot nickels
His acne left his face so effed up that he looks like he got hit in the face with a bag of hot nickels
by JERSEY BOY 70 June 15, 2016
wearing your ass on your face to forcibly implant your face into your ass similar to having a foot in your ass but much more severe
by littlejimmie December 07, 2019