person 1: i watch movies i downloaded off a torrent
person 2: stop doing that, thats illegal
person 1: stop being such a Copyright Police
person 2: stop doing that, thats illegal
person 1: stop being such a Copyright Police
by The Computer Nerd April 3, 2019

That's exactly what it means Chael. You are trying to turn my expression of free speak into nothing more than air so you can steal AI from me. Some expressions of free speech are worth more than others and an original theory of AI is what you would call a "dissertation." You do need to pay for it because I SAID you have to pay for it.
by Hym Iam September 21, 2025

Ooooooooh! The money generator!? Yeah, I forgot I did that! Ha! Humanity's greatest inventor!! Hahaha!
by Hym Iam July 23, 2023

youtuber: i had a video of mine copyrighted for having 3 seconds of can your balls hang low in it.
viewer: thats 69 copyright rants now.
viewer: thats 69 copyright rants now.
by fax machine 69.0 April 17, 2022

someone who will strike down anything and everything they deem is infringing on their copyright, even if the violation is very minor or can be rebuked. if the attempt fails, most commonly they will then sue the violator. they also might have ulterior motives.
someone : *uses a photo that's in the public domain in whatever*
someone else (copyright snowflake) : YOU CANT USE THAT
someone : uh, I bought this photo off a stock image website
copyright snowflake : I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about that formatting/editing style you're using, thats mine!
someone : its only like 2 seconds ffs, I can just change it or cut it out.
copyright snowflake : sorry! I have to send a strike!
someone else (copyright snowflake) : YOU CANT USE THAT
someone : uh, I bought this photo off a stock image website
copyright snowflake : I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about that formatting/editing style you're using, thats mine!
someone : its only like 2 seconds ffs, I can just change it or cut it out.
copyright snowflake : sorry! I have to send a strike!
by Xxnoobdestroyer29xX June 15, 2023

by PhoneGuyYT April 22, 2025

"Where (YouTube) merely assists an author in the creative process, its use does not change the copyrightability of the output,"
"Where a human inputs their own copyrightable work and that work is perceptible in the output, they will be the author of at least that portion of the output,"
From an "Ars Technica" article about the copyrightability of art as it relates to AI but I think it applies nicely here.
"Where a human inputs their own copyrightable work and that work is perceptible in the output, they will be the author of at least that portion of the output,"
From an "Ars Technica" article about the copyrightability of art as it relates to AI but I think it applies nicely here.
Hym "And what part of 'Using the existing architecture of narrative-interpreting AI in conjunction with a massive data set and a sophisticated compression algorithm (specifically to cut down on the energy cost)' is imperceptible? That's me. That is the 'they will be the author of AT LEAST that portion of the output. THAT is all that is happening here. The YouTube panhandlers wanted to get me for copyright infringement BUT THEY COULDN'T ESTABLISH INTENT. So they decided to engage in this retaliatory and deliberate and for profit copyright infringement campaign. For the YouTube freaks, the retaliatory nature of the act IS the expression of intent. It's cut and dry. It's no intent vs intent. Full forfeiture and restitution! They are also doing it for ideological reason which is a violation of my first amendment rights! Make the jew news pay for burying the story!"
by Hym Iam January 31, 2025
