Skip to main content

Sociology of Naturalistic Orthodoxy

A branch of sociology that examines how naturalistic orthodoxies are socially constructed, maintained, and challenged within academic and intellectual communities. The sociology of naturalistic orthodoxy investigates how naturalism becomes the default worldview through education and training, how it's maintained through institutional mechanisms (funding priorities, publication standards, professional boundaries), how dissenters (intellectuals who appeal to supernatural or non-natural explanations) are marginalized or excluded, and how the orthodoxy responds to challenges from religious thinkers, postmodernists, and other heretics. It also examines naturalism as a boundary marker—distinguishing "serious" scholarship from "faith-based" thinking, "real" knowledge from "mere belief." The sociology of naturalistic orthodoxy reveals that naturalism's dominance isn't just about evidence; it's also about social power, institutional authority, and the natural human tendency to treat one's own worldview as simply "how things are."
Example: "Her sociology of naturalistic orthodoxy research showed how scholars who questioned naturalism were systematically excluded from prestigious journals and conferences—not because their arguments were weak, but because they violated the orthodoxy that defined 'serious' scholarship. The boundary policing was invisible to those who benefited from it."
Sociology of Naturalistic Orthodoxy mug front
Get the Sociology of Naturalistic Orthodoxy mug.
See more merch

Sociology of Evidence-Based Orthodoxy

A branch of sociology that examines how evidence-based orthodoxies are socially constructed, maintained, and challenged within professional communities. The sociology of evidence-based orthodoxy investigates how evidentiary hierarchies become institutionalized through training, how they're maintained through professional standards and funding priorities, how alternative approaches (qualitative research, community knowledge, practitioner experience) are marginalized, and how the orthodoxy responds to challenges from those who question its hierarchy. It also examines the role of evidence-based orthodoxy in professional boundary-work—distinguishing "real" professionals from "quacks," "scientific" practice from "anecdotal" approaches, "legitimate" knowledge from "mere" experience. The sociology of evidence-based orthodoxy reveals that evidentiary hierarchies aren't just about epistemology; they're also about professional power, institutional authority, and the social construction of expertise.
Example: "Her sociology of evidence-based orthodoxy research showed how the hierarchy of evidence serves professional interests—elevating researchers over practitioners, quantitative over qualitative expertise, academic knowledge over community wisdom. The hierarchy isn't just about truth; it's about who gets to say what counts."

Sociology of Orthodoxy

A branch of sociology that examines how orthodoxies are socially constructed, maintained, challenged, and transformed across different domains—religious, scientific, political, cultural. The sociology of orthodoxy investigates the social dynamics that produce and sustain consensus: how communities form around shared beliefs, how institutions enforce orthodoxy through rewards and sanctions, how dissenters are marginalized or incorporated, how orthodoxies shift through generational change and external pressure. It examines the role of power, status, and authority in shaping who gets to define orthodoxy; the relationship between orthodoxy and social identity (how belonging to an orthodox community becomes part of who we are); and the ways that orthodoxies persist through social inertia even when evidence shifts. The sociology of orthodoxy reveals that what counts as "settled truth" is never just a matter of evidence—it's always also a matter of social agreement, institutional power, and community dynamics.
Example: "Her sociology of orthodoxy research showed how scientific consensus forms through the same social processes as religious orthodoxy—networks of trust, authority of elders, rituals of confirmation, exclusion of heretics. The content differs, but the social dynamics are remarkably similar."

Sociology of the Scientific Method

A branch of sociology that examines how the scientific method is socially constructed, maintained, and practiced within scientific communities—focusing on the institutions, norms, power relations, and social dynamics that shape what counts as proper method. The sociology of the scientific method investigates how methods are taught and transmitted, how methodological standards are enforced, how methodological disputes are resolved, how status and authority influence which methods are valued, and how the method varies across different scientific communities and historical periods. It reveals that the scientific method is not a timeless, universal procedure but a social practice—shaped by training, community norms, institutional pressures, and cultural context. Understanding this social dimension is essential for recognizing why methods change, why controversies arise, and why the same method can produce different results in different settings.
Sociology of the Scientific Method Example: "Her sociology of the scientific method research showed that what counts as 'proper' experimental design varies dramatically across fields—not because some fields are less rigorous, but because different communities have different standards shaped by their history, training, and problems. The method is social all the way down."

Sociology of Reason and Rationality Literacy

The ability to analyze how social structures, institutions, and power relations shape what counts as reasonable. It draws on the sociology of knowledge and science to show that standards of rationality vary across social contexts, are enforced by professional communities, and can serve to exclude certain groups. This literacy reveals that who gets to define “rational” is itself a question of power.
Example: “Her sociology of reason and rationality literacy helped her expose how the label ‘irrational’ was applied to protest movements—not because their demands lacked reason, but because their forms of reasoning didn’t fit the elite institutions where ‘rational’ was defined.”

Sociology of Skepticism

A field that studies skepticism as a social phenomenon—how skeptical communities form, how they enforce orthodoxy, how they distinguish legitimate doubt from “pseudoskepticism,” and how skepticism can serve as a status marker or a tool for exclusion. It examines the social networks, conferences, publications, and online spaces where skepticism is practiced, revealing that skeptics are not isolated individuals but members of communities with their own rituals, heroes, and boundary‑policing mechanisms.
Example: “The sociology of skepticism revealed that online skeptic forums often replicate the same gatekeeping they accuse religious communities of—excommunicating heretics who question the group’s sacred texts, like peer‑reviewed consensus.”

Sociology of Atheism

The study of atheists as a social group—their demographics, identities, community formation, and interactions with broader society. It investigates how atheist communities form (often in reaction to religious dominance), how they create rituals, social networks, and narratives, and how atheism intersects with politics, race, gender, and class. The sociology of atheism treats atheism not as a mere absence but as a positive social identity with its own culture, institutions, and internal conflicts.
Example: “The sociology of atheism research found that while atheists often present themselves as hyper‑rational individuals, they form communities with their own conventions, conferences, and celebrities—functionally similar to religious congregations.”